See below email from an anxious member requesting advice What experience of this emulsion do you have?
From: Steve McHale
Sent: 19 September 2005 13:14
To: Nic Doczi
Subject: RE: 996 C4s, Emulsion under oil filler cap
[FONT=comic sans ms"]Nic[blockquote]
T[FONT=comic sans ms"]his sound like a car that does a lot of short journeys 12,500 in two years! In engines like this the oil never reaches full operating temperature ( above 100 deg C ) for long enough to totally [FONT=comic sans ms"]evaporate the water vapour which is produced every time the engine is started from cold, this vapour will condense at the highest points as the engine cools down[FONT=comic sans ms"] causing a build up of emulsion in the filer neck
Tell him to take it on a track day that should sort the problem.[FONT=comic sans ms"] [FONT=comic sans ms"]As usual with the press there is a little bit of truth in there somewhere. 3.4 engines crack cylinder heads this usually results in the cooling system filling up with engine oil but in some cases we have seen the core plugs in the heads fall out its very easy to spot either one fills the header tank full of engine oil the other dumps more than two gallon of coolant into the sump[FONT=comic sans ms"] [FONT=comic sans ms"]Steve
Sent: 17 September 2005 18:30
Subject: 996 C4s, Emulsion under oil filler cap
On Saturday 21st September, the Daily Telegraph published a buyer's guide for the 996 range including my car, a 996 C4s. The article said that if one was a used car buyer and thetre was an emulsion under the oil filler cap one should not buy the car as it probably needed a new engine! My car is just under two years old and still under warranty it has done 12,500 miles and has had the oil filler neck and cap cleaned out by the main dealer twice and once by me as this emulsion was present. The gunk has returned again and it seems that this is to be a permanent feature of the engine. The main dealer, Dick Lovett in Cardiff, says that there is no problem, that they all do that and that the engine is fine. I have written to Porsche GB Ltd and had a brush off. I have suggested to Porsche that they demand a retraction from the paper and they have declined to do that so far. Who does one believe? Does my car need a new engine? Is this a standard feature of this engine? How can the Daily Telegraph print this sort of information unchallenged? I have always understood that the oil and water should be separate - this seems to be a "no-brainer" They are mixing in my car and I am naturally very concerned. Have you any advice to help resolve my dilemma?[/blockquote]
From: Steve McHale
Sent: 19 September 2005 13:14
To: Nic Doczi
Subject: RE: 996 C4s, Emulsion under oil filler cap
[FONT=comic sans ms"]Nic[blockquote]
T[FONT=comic sans ms"]his sound like a car that does a lot of short journeys 12,500 in two years! In engines like this the oil never reaches full operating temperature ( above 100 deg C ) for long enough to totally [FONT=comic sans ms"]evaporate the water vapour which is produced every time the engine is started from cold, this vapour will condense at the highest points as the engine cools down[FONT=comic sans ms"] causing a build up of emulsion in the filer neck
Tell him to take it on a track day that should sort the problem.[FONT=comic sans ms"] [FONT=comic sans ms"]As usual with the press there is a little bit of truth in there somewhere. 3.4 engines crack cylinder heads this usually results in the cooling system filling up with engine oil but in some cases we have seen the core plugs in the heads fall out its very easy to spot either one fills the header tank full of engine oil the other dumps more than two gallon of coolant into the sump[FONT=comic sans ms"] [FONT=comic sans ms"]Steve
Sent: 17 September 2005 18:30
Subject: 996 C4s, Emulsion under oil filler cap
On Saturday 21st September, the Daily Telegraph published a buyer's guide for the 996 range including my car, a 996 C4s. The article said that if one was a used car buyer and thetre was an emulsion under the oil filler cap one should not buy the car as it probably needed a new engine! My car is just under two years old and still under warranty it has done 12,500 miles and has had the oil filler neck and cap cleaned out by the main dealer twice and once by me as this emulsion was present. The gunk has returned again and it seems that this is to be a permanent feature of the engine. The main dealer, Dick Lovett in Cardiff, says that there is no problem, that they all do that and that the engine is fine. I have written to Porsche GB Ltd and had a brush off. I have suggested to Porsche that they demand a retraction from the paper and they have declined to do that so far. Who does one believe? Does my car need a new engine? Is this a standard feature of this engine? How can the Daily Telegraph print this sort of information unchallenged? I have always understood that the oil and water should be separate - this seems to be a "no-brainer" They are mixing in my car and I am naturally very concerned. Have you any advice to help resolve my dilemma?[/blockquote]