Menu toggle

944 turbo vs stock auto twin turbo supra

Guest

New member
Hello all, I'd just like your feedback on how you think a 944 turbo, modded or standard would fare against an auto twin turbo supra please.
 
Do you have an ounce of taste in your body, and do you value any form of driving finesse at all? 944's have taste and cachet. Supra's are the greatest aspiration of a large number of chavs (as the aftermarket scene in bling <vomit> wheels, huge <vomit><vomit> spoilers and bangin' - innit- sound systems prove).

Simply put, are you a driver, or are you a poser? Do you make your money honestly, as most people do, or do you sell recreational pharmaceuticals for a living and enjoy the attentions of your 12 year old girlfriend?

If you can live with the social opprobrium that comes with driving the automotive equivalent of herpes, then you may be interested in the performance comparison. I, for one, could not and therefore am not ...


Oli.
 
I have had one have a go at my 951 and I must admit as the speed climbed mine left it (particularly in 3rd BUT I dont know what engine it had.
 
approbium
btw it is opprobium.

Crikey - that's a bit harsh Oli!

I thought he was asking which one would outperform the other not which one he should choose. I've got an image of you vomitting over chavved out Supras now! [;)]

Phil
 
At a guess I think the Supra might be torquier than the 944 as it has 6 cylinders but I think the handling of the 944 might cancel out any straight line speed advantage you might have. I also get the impression the Supra is probably considerably heavier than the 944. I've not driven one but the interior is certainly plush with lots of the usual toys that we've come to expect in Japanese cars that all add to the weight. I would imagine the wiring loom on a Supra is like the trunk of a North American Redwood in comparison.
 
I also get the impression the Supra is probably considerably heavier than the 944.

I reckon about 250 - 300 kilos heavier so when you work out power to weight ratios [8D] It is estimated that a 50kg reduction is worth 10 bhp so the 320bhp supra is losing `say` 50-60 bhp and on that basis is about the same as the 250 bhp 951.

Note the weights of some of the 911 porkers these days [8D]
 
I like Supras. [:eek:]

Not the blinged variety, but the standard car is a fine vehicle. Except in auto form of course.
 
btw it is opprobium.

Crikey - that's a bit harsh Oli!

I thought he was asking which one would outperform the other not which one he should choose. I've got an image of you vomitting over chavved out Supras now! [;)]
Phil,

Thanks - It is now edited for correctness.

Harsh? The question was akin to asking for the relative nutritional values of beluga caviar and a Big Mac. Or the vital statistics of Audrey Hepburn and Jade Goody. Or the quality of the nightlife offered by Monte Carlo and Butlins.

Harsh? Completely far, I think you'll find.


Oli.
 
ORIGINAL: zcacogp
Thanks - It is now edited for correctness.

It's opprobrium, surely chaps, with an extra 'r'. I still can't imagine what situation I'd chose a Supra over a nice 944, for similar reasons I can't imagine ever liking Impreza's or Evo's.

Justin.
 
In my mind a Supra is not a comparable comparison to a 944 - they are difference cars. A Supra vs. 928 is a more sensible comparison. A Celica (back in the days when a Celica was a a proper sports car) is a much more sensible comparison to a 944.
 
I quite like supras and have considered one - but they weigh more and dont have the delicate handling balance of a 944. I think brakes are also a bit small for repeated use though some imports have bigger ones. They have very strong engines and can produce big chunks of power with more boost.
So depends on the race as to who would win. 10year old untouched supra more likely to be closer to factory power than a standard 20 year old 944
Tony
 
Harsh? The question was akin to asking for the relative nutritional values of beluga caviar and a Big Mac. Or the vital statistics of Audrey Hepburn and Jade Goody. Or the quality of the nightlife offered by Monte Carlo and Butlins.

Exactly, Oli. I'd fully agree with you that a weekend in a chalet with Jade and a Big Mac would be good enough for us! None of that fancy stuff for the 944 massive...[;)]



 
ORIGINAL: pauljmcnulty

Harsh? The question was akin to asking for the relative nutritional values of beluga caviar and a Big Mac. Or the vital statistics of Audrey Hepburn and Jade Goody. Or the quality of the nightlife offered by Monte Carlo and Butlins.

Exactly, Oli. I'd fully agree with you that a weekend in a chalet with Jade and a Big Mac would be good enough for us! None of that fancy stuff for the 944 massive...[;)]
:MakesMentalNoteToNeverTalkToA944OwnerAgain,NotVisitThisForumAndTryToWinThe
HeartOfAudreyHepburn,LiveInMonteCarloAndEatCaviarRegularly:
 
Now say what you really think Oli. No use in letting others possibly taking you the wrong way is there? lol


ORIGINAL: zcacogp

Do you have an ounce of taste in your body, and do you value any form of driving finesse at all? 944's have taste and cachet. Supra's are the greatest aspiration of a large number of chavs (as the aftermarket scene in bling <vomit> wheels, huge <vomit><vomit> spoilers and bangin' - innit- sound systems prove).


Simply put, are you a driver, or are you a poser? Do you make your money honestly, as most people do, or do you sell recreational pharmaceuticals for a living and enjoy the attentions of your 12 year old girlfriend?

If you can live with the social opprobrium that comes with driving the automotive equivalent of herpes, then you may be interested in the performance comparison. I, for one, could not and therefore am not ...


Oli.
 
I love the responses but as for your original question. Standard car vs standard car they are (at least to the accuracy of an eye) absolutely dead even. I could very slowly gain a little on the automatic expecially in 4th and 5th gear (could be he was breaking the air for me) but up to 3rd they are a dead heat and there wasn't an inch to be gained or lost.

Ben
 
ORIGINAL: pauljmcnulty

.....I'd fully agree with you that a weekend in a chalet with Jade and a Big Mac would be good enough for us! None of that fancy stuff for the 944 massive...[;)]

Speak for yourself "McN".

I'd rather do unpleasant things to my dangly sphericals with a sharpened pencil then spend any time with Jade Baddie. While a Big Mac might not be quite so high on my obnoxiometer it still isn't something I would eat by choice.

I'm pleased that we are now getting some slightly more reasoned comparisons between a prime example of German engineering and some cheap far eastern copy though.
 
ORIGINAL: 333pg333

Now say what you really think Oli. No use in letting others possibly taking you the wrong way is there? lol
Ah, thanks! If that is permission, then I'll be a little less shy-and-retiring next time 'round!


Oli.
 
Speak for yourself "McN".

I'd rather do unpleasant things to my dangly sphericals with a sharpened pencil then spend any time with Jade Baddie. While a Big Mac might not be quite so high on my obnoxiometer it still isn't something I would eat by choice.

I was being ironic......[&:]

Can I borrow your obnoxiometer sometime?
 
From personal knowledge, the engineering on the Supra is suspect.
Two guys at work have Supras.
"J's" had a split intercooler and was loosing boost from under the front wing
"N's" had on oil filter relocation kit fitted and the accessability of the original is dire;
except that the kit was fitted incorrectly and all the oil was sucked out of the sump; Once it had been established that the fitting company was at fault, the aforementioned company was left with a large bill for the rebuild of "N's" engine.
Don't be mesmerised by the twin turbo nomenclature. The two turbochargers work in different ranges, the smaller of the two spooling up quickly, low down, to illiminate turbo-lag, as far as possible.
I personally don't like the styling of the Supra.
It's a bit, no a lot, like comparing chalk and cheese.
 

Posts made and opinions expressed are those of the individual forum members

Use of the Forum is subject to the Terms and Conditions

Disclaimer

The opinions expressed on this site are not necessarily those of the Club, who shall have no liability in respect of them or the accuracy of the content. The Club assumes no responsibility for any effects arising from errors or omissions.

Porsche Club Great Britain gives no warranties, guarantees or assurances and makes no representations or recommendations regarding any goods or services advertised on this site. It is the responsibility of visitors to satisfy themselves that goods and/or services supplied by any advertiser are bona fide and in no instance can the Porsche Club Great Britain be held responsible.

When responding to advertisements please ensure that you satisfy yourself of any applicable call charges on numbers not prefixed by usual "landline" STD Codes. Information can be obtained from the operator or the white pages. Before giving out ANY information regarding cars, or any other items for sale, please satisfy yourself that any potential purchaser is bona fide.

Directors of the Board of Porsche Club GB, Club Office Staff, Register Secretaries and Regional Organisers are often requested by Club members to provide information on matters connected with their cars and other matters referred to in the Club Rules. Such information, advice and assistance provided by such persons is given in good faith and is based on the personal experience and knowledge of the individual concerned.

Neither Porsche Club GB, nor any of the aforementioned, shall be under any liability in respect of any such information, advice or assistance given to members. Members are advised to consult qualified specialists for information, advice and assistance on matters connected with their cars at all times.

Back
Top