steveoz32
New member
Just browsing auto trader today and saw this:
http://www.autotrader.co.uk/classified/advert/201037368343246/sort/priceasc/usedcars/model/911/make/porsche/radius/100/postcode/sn34pd/page/2/quicksearch/true?logcode=p
My first instinct said that at this price it is going to be one to steer clear of!
Being local however, I thought no harm in looking and enquiring to see why it was so cheap. I didn't really get to the bottom of it. The chap buys and sells cars, and claims the car was sourced from a lawyer in london who didn't want the bother of selling privately, so he had it inspected, it came out ok and he made him an offer which was accepted.
According to the seller the car although at 111k had a major service at 109k, which included over 2k of documented work from the local porsche garage to the owner, it consisted of fluid changes (oil and brake fluid change), spark plugs, filters, coils, new MAF and gearbox oil seal as well as clutch. He claims it to be HPI clear with certificate. I asked for the chaps postcode, he advised he was out collecting a car tonight so i put the postcode in the sat nav on the way home and popped over and had a look around it as it was on the way home from work. From the outside it actually looks mint, no scratches, scathes or signs of aging, it appears it has had new discs front and back, although drilled, so I suspect not OEM (they were new as they had no visible discolouring and the hub covers were still silver), the brake pads front and back also apeared new, as well as the front tyres, the rears had a few k off of them though. The body was straight and solid, the interior looked clean apart from some minor wear on the drivers bolster. Underneath the car was also solid and sealed. The exhaust looked ok, discoloured however as mild steel does. The wishbones and suspension components looked aged, but not damaged in any way. The bottom of the gearbox and engine was grimey, it appeared from road dirt and general ground in grease, but was dry and not oiley.
I was actually surprised by the condition, the car also has 12 months mot and is taxed until march 2011.
From what I could see it looked like it has been looked after, but I wonder how he got his hands on it, and how cheap it was - especially given he is selling it on that cheap.
I'm curious, and waiting to see the other one at the weekend, so I am popping over tomorrow on the way home to check it out properly and test it.
I'll let you guys know how it drives and if anything odd shows up. If nothing else it will be something to compare to the one I am seeing at the weekend.
Thanks,
Steve
http://www.autotrader.co.uk/classified/advert/201037368343246/sort/priceasc/usedcars/model/911/make/porsche/radius/100/postcode/sn34pd/page/2/quicksearch/true?logcode=p
My first instinct said that at this price it is going to be one to steer clear of!
Being local however, I thought no harm in looking and enquiring to see why it was so cheap. I didn't really get to the bottom of it. The chap buys and sells cars, and claims the car was sourced from a lawyer in london who didn't want the bother of selling privately, so he had it inspected, it came out ok and he made him an offer which was accepted.
According to the seller the car although at 111k had a major service at 109k, which included over 2k of documented work from the local porsche garage to the owner, it consisted of fluid changes (oil and brake fluid change), spark plugs, filters, coils, new MAF and gearbox oil seal as well as clutch. He claims it to be HPI clear with certificate. I asked for the chaps postcode, he advised he was out collecting a car tonight so i put the postcode in the sat nav on the way home and popped over and had a look around it as it was on the way home from work. From the outside it actually looks mint, no scratches, scathes or signs of aging, it appears it has had new discs front and back, although drilled, so I suspect not OEM (they were new as they had no visible discolouring and the hub covers were still silver), the brake pads front and back also apeared new, as well as the front tyres, the rears had a few k off of them though. The body was straight and solid, the interior looked clean apart from some minor wear on the drivers bolster. Underneath the car was also solid and sealed. The exhaust looked ok, discoloured however as mild steel does. The wishbones and suspension components looked aged, but not damaged in any way. The bottom of the gearbox and engine was grimey, it appeared from road dirt and general ground in grease, but was dry and not oiley.
I was actually surprised by the condition, the car also has 12 months mot and is taxed until march 2011.
From what I could see it looked like it has been looked after, but I wonder how he got his hands on it, and how cheap it was - especially given he is selling it on that cheap.
I'm curious, and waiting to see the other one at the weekend, so I am popping over tomorrow on the way home to check it out properly and test it.
I'll let you guys know how it drives and if anything odd shows up. If nothing else it will be something to compare to the one I am seeing at the weekend.
Thanks,
Steve