Menu toggle

997 Carrera and Carrera S vs. Corvette

Guest

New member
Thought you guys might like to read a couple of articles I found in when in the US 6 weeks ago.
It's taken a while to be bothered to upload these.

The first is Carrera S v Corvette.
The second is Carrera v Corvette.

I'm not saying I agree with the findings, but it makes for interesting reading.
If this becomes the general perception in the US (Porsche's biggest market) then just as well they have the Cayenne.
 
From Road and Track.

Classic Warfare
America's best - the sixth-generation Corvette - takes on Germany's sports-car stalwart - the new 911.

Cars come and cars go. We wish some never came, and there are a whole bunch we lament ever left. But two cars that just won't go away - and we're thrilled about this - are the Chevrolet Corvette and Porsche 911. These two old dogs have been around long enough to be sporting serious grey on their muzzles. But because of constant refinement without drastic changes, both cars enjoy incredibly loyal followings, not to mention world-class performance. For 2005, both models are considered "all-new", yet both sport styling cues from past models. Have the designers spent too much time recalling the good old days and not enough on the road ahead? Don't count on it.



Chevrolette Corvette
By Shaun Bailey

Let's point out the obvious. We are comparing a $54,000 Corvette with an $89,000 Porsche. That's a whopper of price difference. The mere fact that the Corvette is even considered competition is praise.

For 2005 each car is completely new, yet clearly linked to its successful predecessor. Porsche figured the 911 out years ago and instead of redesigning the car, they just continue to refine it. Corvettes have now reached that point - this being the first 'Vette that can, at a glance, be confused with the model (C5) it replaces. Nobody is complaining. Chevrolet got it right with the C5 styling and this new sixth generation is a beautiful evolution.

Every part of the Corvette, from its fibreglass body to its hydroformed steel frame rails, has been improved. The pushrod 5.7-litre V-8 LS1 small block is replaced with the 6.0-litre LS2, with the bore increased by 2.6 mm. Engine performance is bumped up to an even 400 bhp and 400 lbft of torque. This increase of 50 horsepower and 25 lbft is due in large part to technology gleaned from the head design of the LS6 engine that powered the C5 Z06. The LS2, like the LS1, pulls hard and smoothly at any rpm, yet thanks to a muted exhaust is never as loud as the LS6. Chevrolet claims the new Corvette with the Z51 Performance Suspension is a tad slower than the Z06 on the track. From our runs at the Buttonwillow Raceway Park, it appears true and we eagerly await the C6 Z06, which is sure to be ferocious.

The Porsche posts 0-60 mph times a tenth quicker than the Corvette, and holds that tenth through the quarter mile as well. Thanks to the Carerra's rear weight bias, it gets a great launch, but that's really the only reason it's quicker. Out on the street, the LS2 definitely has a leg up on the flat-6 power wise. In an impromtu roll-on in 3rd gear, the Corvette easily gapped the 911.

In the Corvette, transitioning from street touring to corner-carving at the track comes down to how far (and fast) you press the gas pedal. The 'Vette's limits are high, but it is fairly easy to control. When you get there, it lets you know by slowly kicking the tail out on corner exits. With more than a foot less wheelbase and a pendulum-like weight distribution, the 911 requires early braking and quick use of its sharp steering to stay on the track. We all agreed the 911 shows more of its race-car roots, even thogh lap times were about equal.

The one major discrepancy between the Porsche and the Corvette is the ease with which the 911's transmission can be shifted. The Porsche gearbox is exquisite with a light effort and smooth engagement. Tremec's 6-speed in the 'Vette feels heavy and slow, although shorter throws are a noticeable improvement over the C5's.

The Corvette has three suspension choices: stock, F55 Magnetic Selective Ride Control and Z51. Having specified the most agressive Z51 suspension for our test, we expected a rough ride. It's not harsh at all; in fact it feels smoother than the 911 with the adjustable dampers set to soft. Part of that might have to do with the Corvette's 105.7 in. wheelbase. Our Southern California freeways have a washboard-like surface that causes chassis vibration above 60 mph and a long wheelbase helps to reduce that. On high-speed sweepers, the 911's light front end tends to bob over undulations. At a good clip on a bumpy road, a driver will feel somewhat disconnected. In contrast, the Corvette soaks up bumps with confidence.

We punctured a rear tyre on the Corvette after testing, but thanks to run-flat Goodyears that come as standard, we were able to drive the car to our local Allen Tire for a quick fix. (The Porsche comes with a fix-a-tyre kit stowed up front.) Run-flat tyres have improved immensely in the past three years as evidenced by the Corvette's superior skidpan performance.

Not only does the Corvette perform on a par with the Porsche, it takes the cake when it comes to well-thought-out interior. The centre-mounted display touch screen is one of the best around. The dual-zone climate control is also straightforward. All systems are simple to manipulate with a minimal number of buttons. This lack of clutter leaves the dash and centre stack clean and elegant, as compared to the Star Trek look of the 911's panel. Without such a touch screen, the Carrera is forced to have numerous buttons, some of whose functions are not easy to decipher at a glance.

An improved head-up display is optional on the Corvette and offers multiple modes and display settings. The instrument cluster is similar to the previous generation's, with a few more buttons to tweak the extra features and configurations. The most important button is traction control, which is easily accessible on the transmission tunnel. It has three modes. Press once to disable traction control. Press again for a competition mode. Press and hold if you want to turn off traction control and yaw control completely and get a little crazy.

The coupe is actually a targa, and the top can be removed easily by one person and stored in its rack under the rear hatch. At speeds above 70 mph, with the top off, buffeting becomes extreme and having the windows up only makes it worse. Top-down cruising is fine around town, but not on the freeway.

What we have here is an American muscle car that's become so refined it outclasses its European competition at a fraction of the cost. Whether cruising the boulevard, pounding out some miles on the Interstate or lapping Porsches on the track, the new 'Vette can do it. If you liked the C5, you'll love the C6.



Porsche 911 Carrera S
By Mike Monticello

"Listen guys," senior editor Kim Wolfkill exclaimed after pulling off his helmet, "You really need to pay attention to every little input you make with this car. It's incredibly sensitive." We're guessing Kim wasn't referring to the new 911 Carrera S's overly fastidious feelings. Nope. He had just discovered, after his first stint around Buttonwillow, that for all the talk of how Porsche has "dumbed down" the 911's handling, above 7/10ths this new 997 version is still very much a driver's car.

And make no mistake, this is a new 911. It follows the same recipe for success that Porsche has lived by since the 911's inception: relentless refinement. Admittedly, it's hard to tell a 997 from a 996 at a quick glance, unless you catch the new oval headlights that recall the 993. The keen eye will also note the new 911 sports more muscular fenders and more pronounced wheel arches and lower sills, while the side of the car is more sculpted than before. New double-arm sideview mirrors also help distinguish a 997 from a 996, as does the cutline that angles from the rear wheel well up to the taillights, as opposed to the horizontal line that ended below the lights on the old car.

Just about every facet of the 911's interior has been redesigned, including a wider spaced guage cluster and a new centre console that looks great but has too many small buttons. The new, lighter-weight seats offer excellent seat cushion lateral support but wide bodies will find the seat back too narrow. We have to mention the 13-speaker Bose Surround Sound stereo system; it's one of the best we've heard, with unbelievable clarity.

Even though it may be difficult to tell the new 911 from the old by looking at it, from the driver's seat (where we like to be) the changes are more noticeable. Porsche gave the Carrera S a 3.0 mm larger bore (bringing its horizontally-opposed 6-cylinder to 3.8 litres) versus the standard Carrera, but also added a new induction system with shorter intakes, new intake cams and modified injector angles. Power is rated at 355 bhp at 6600 rpm (the standard Carrera's 3.6 has 325 bhp) and 295 lbft ot torque at 4600. Thanks to lightweight engine components, the 3.8 engine weighs the same as the 3.6.


Of course, the Carrera S's boxer-6 still sounds vaguely like a Volkswagen Beetle at idle and low revs, but once the tachometer needle starts scrambling upward, the growl is pure 911 magic, all the way to the 7200-rpm redline.
But can it hang with a Corvette that boasts 400 bhp and 400 lbft of torque? It helps that the 911 weighs 70 lb. less than the 'Vette, but more important in its 4.4-second run to 60 mph (0.1 sec. quicker than the 'Vette) is the superior initial traction it gets on launch. The power of the Corvette is more telling in the quarter mile, though, because despite the fact that the 911 again eclipses it in time (12.8 sec. for the 911 vs. 12.9), the Corvette is ripping along at 112.3 mph while the Porsche manages 110.2. In real-world driving - meaning roll-on acceleration - the Corvette is faster.

Porsche gave the 911 a new 6-speed manual gearbox that has both 15-percent shorter shift throws yet also reduced shift effort. The new gearbox is an absolute breeze to use and is so natural that you don't even have to think about the process of shifting on the track, whereas the Corvette's slow , high-effort shifter takes more concentration.

Unlike the Corvette, which is significantly shorter than last year's car yet with a longer wheelbase, not much has changed regarding the 911's dimensions, other than 0.8 in. more front track, 0.6 in. more rear track, a 1.1 in. longer body and 1.5 in. more overall width. The Carrera S leaves quite a large Michelin Pilot Sport footprint, with 235/35ZR-19s up front and 295/30ZR-19s at the rear, compared with the Corvette's 285/35ZR-19 rears. Adding to the Carrera S's roadholding abilities is Porsche Active Suspension Management (PASM). The system can be switched between two damper settings - normal or sport - via a button on the centre console, though even in normal mode the system will activate a firmer damper control map if it senses a change in driving style.

The difference between the two settings is quite dramatic, with the softer setting certainly not cushy, but far more forgiving than the sport mode, which is best for track duty and when really hammering on a twisty road. The system certainly showed its mettle in our handling tests, where the 911 slithered its way through the slalom at an average 2.6 mph faster than the 'Vette, though it lost out in overall grip - 0.94g versus the 'Vette's 0.95g. The 187 ft. the Carrera S required to stop from 80 mph - a new R&T record - bests the Ferrari Enzo and Lotus Elise, achieved with gorgeous 13.0 in. cross-drilled and vented rotors (front and rear), clamped by 4-piston monobloc callipers.

While the straight-up numbers show that these two cars are close in performance, their personalities are miles apart. With lots of grip front and rear, the Corvette is the easier car to get in and drive fast immediately. The only place it will really bite you is exiting a high speed corner with too much throttle (all that power!). The 911, on the other hand, doesn't take kindly to abrupt transitions - especially panic drop-throttle - and needs power on to stabilize the rear through high speed turns. But when driven properly, the 911 can do magical things and the driver is so much more a part of the experience than in the Corvette, which gives far less feeedback. In the 911, every driver input is met by a direct response.
The brake pedal is utterly firm, the steering hides nothing, and each throttle blip rockets the tachometer needle upward.
And though the Corvette is only 0.3 in. longer and 1.4 in. wider, it feels a lot bigger than the nimble 911 on back roads.

The 911 Carrera S is almost $35,000 more (as tested) than the Corvette; that's why it didn't win this test, although it should be noted that the 911 did win both the performance and subjective categories. Yes the engine still sounds funny at low revs and the interior isn't perfect ... but it delivers one of the purest driving experiences in the world. In other words, it's still a 911. And we love it as much as ever.



On Track:
Two very different ways of going fast (Kim Wolfkill)

Swoopy new sheet metal and revamped interiors may look good on the street, but they don't mean diddly at the race track. Out there qualities like power, handling, balance and grip separate the performers from the pretenders. Our two protagonists, the Chevrolet Corvette and Porsche 911 Carerra S, are certainly no strangers to the track, having logged hundreds of testing laps during their respective chassis development programs.

For our testing, we take them to Southern California's Buttonwillow Raceway Park, where the 'Vette and 911 waste little time getting down to business. Each feels strong right out of the gate, but how these vastly dissimilar machines achieve their speed couldn't be more different.

In the front-engine/rear-drive Corvette, making the transition from street to track is really just a matter of driving faster.
As speeds and cornering forces increase, it loses little of the composure exhibted on the street. It remains balanced and largely unaffected by the extra workload of road-course duty. Compared with the C5, the sixth generation has a more willing attitude, reacting with less delay between driver input and chassis response. There isn't as much pitch or roll (despite an increase in both front and rear suspension travel over the C5), making it easier to load the chassis at the beginning of a turn, then accelerate through it.

Driven hard, the Corvette is comfortable sliding either end, responding well to throttle modulation to adjust the cars' cornering attitude. Backing out of the gas gives the nose some bite, while rolling back onto it predictably rotates the rear under power. That said - despite the 'Vette's improved chassis dynamics - 400 bhp and 400 lbft of torque still require a patient right foot. Feeding the power in smoothly and progressively through the apex helps keep the rear planted while allowing a touch of corner-exit drift at full throttle.

Hit the track in the Carerra S and the street/track transition isn't quite as seamless as with the Corvette. It takes a couple of laps to get comfortable with the Porsche's shorter wheelbase and rear weight bias. Like all modern 911s, the Carerra S is at once very forgiving, but also pitch sensitive at speed, calling for a driving style that carefully manages how weight transfers among the chassis' four corners. It responds best when braking, steering and throttle inputs flow one into the next, maintaining a stable platform and allowing the chassis to work at its optimum.

Compared with the current 996, the 997 is slightly more accommodating on track, while at the same time responding more quickly to driver inputs. The front tyres still push approaching the limit, but backing out of the gas now produces a more immediate response. Rotating the car is a breeze, as is accelerating through the apex with ever-increasing doses of throttle. The S enjoys markedly better mid range punch than the current car, pulling with greater conviction from 3500 rpm to the redline. Combine this with the gearbox's quicker, more positive shifts and the Carrera S's acceleration begins to approach GT3 territory.

Put a stopwatch on this pair and the Corvette pips the Porsche by barely more than half a second over the course of a 2-minute-plus lap. This puts them very close in overall performance, yet they way they turned their respective lap times differs considerably.

The 'Vette is all about torque, its 6.0 litre LS2 engine pulling effortlessly from just about anywhere on the tach. This both helps and hurts, the added power translating to faster acceleration down the straights, but also increasing the burden on the rear tyres exiting corners. With its trademark rear engine layout, the Porsche lays the power down more effectively in most slow- to medium-speed turns, helping make up for some of its horsepower deficit to the big V-8.
Braking performance is pretty close between the two, with the Porsche enjoying a slight edge in overall stopping power.

In the twisty stuff, both cars carry about the same corner speed, but at different points in the turn.
The C6 uses its tyres more evenly through the beginning and middle parts of the turn, before transitioning to a slight tail-out attitude in the final third. The 911 gives up a measure of front grip to the 'Vette approaching the middle of the turn, but responds more positively to rotation, allowing the driver to roll back on power earlier, settle the rear end and accelerate out. In quick transitions the, the 'Vette feels bigger dimensionally, but not necessarily heavier or slower to react.
Its steering, however, suffers from a certain numbness, lacking the Porsche's precise feel and nearly telepathic feedback.

Two different cars with remarkably similar racetrack performance. The Corvette turns its laps with a combination of power and balance, while the Carrera S gets the job done with agility and grip. At the end of the day, the Corvette is the easier car to get in and drive hard, while the Carrera, albeit trickier at first, is the more satisfying (and challenging) to drive quickly. Fast, fun and different - just how 'Vettes and 911s have always been and, thankfully, how they still are.



The results (normalised)

***************************** Corvette **** Carrera S
Performance
0-60mph time ---- 30 pts ----- 29.3 -------- 30.0
0-1/4 mile ------ 30 pts ----- 29.8 -------- 30.0
Slalom ---------- 30 pts ----- 28.9 -------- 30.0
Skidpad --------- 30 pts ----- 30.0 -------- 29.7
Braking, 60-0 --- 30 pts ----- 28.7 -------- 30.0
Braking, 80-0 --- 30 pts ----- 27.8 -------- 30.0
Fuel economy ---- 20 pts ----- 20.0 -------- 18.7

Subtotal ------- 200 pts ---- 194.5 ------- 198.4

Sujective ratings
Driving excitment 20 pts ----- 19.0 -------- 20.0
Engine ---------- 20 pts ----- 20.0 -------- 19.0
Gearbox --------- 20 pts ----- 15.0 -------- 20.0
Steering -------- 20 pts ----- 18.9 -------- 20.0
Brakes ---------- 20 pts ----- 19.0 -------- 20.0
Ride ------------ 20 pts ----- 19.0 -------- 20.0
Handling -------- 20 pts ----- 20.0 -------- 20.0
Exterior styling 15 pts ----- 15.0 -------- 15.0
Interior styling 15 pts ----- 12.8 -------- 15.0
Seats ----------- 10 pts ----- 9.5 -------- 10.0
Ergonomics ------ 10 pts ----- 10.0 -------- 7.5
Luggage space --- 10 pts ----- 10.0 -------- 8.5

Subtotal ------- 200 pts ---- 188.2 ------- 195.0

Total points --- 400 pts ---- 382.7 ------- 393.4

Price
Price as tested 200 pts ---- 200.0 ------- 180.3
Ratio based upon most expensive


Grand total --- 600 pts ---- 582.7 ------- 573.7

Corvette wins (since it is cheaper).



**************** Corvette *** Carrera S
General Data
#
Curb weight --- 3300 lb ----- 3230 lb
Test weight --- 3480 lb ----- 3360 lb
Weight dist --- 52/48 ------- 40/60 f/r
Wheelbase ----- 105.7 in ---- 92.5 in
Track f/r ----- 62.1/60.7 --- 58.5/59.7
Length -------- 174.6 in ---- 174.3 in
Width --------- 72.6 in ----- 71.2 in
Height -------- 49.1 in ----- 51.6 in


Acceleration
#
0-20 mph ----- 1.2 ------- 1.0
0-40 mph ----- 2.6 ------- 2.2
0-60 mph ----- 4.5 ------- 4.4
0-80 mph ----- 7.2 ------- 7.2
0-100 mph ----- 10.1 ------- 10.7
1/4 mile ------ 12.9 (112.3) --- 12.8 (110.2mph)


Braking
#
From 60 mph ------ 114 ft ------ 109 ft
From 80 mph ------ 202 ft ------ 187 ft
Control ---------- excellent --- excellent
Brake feel ------- very good --- very good
Overall rating --- excellent --- excellent


Handling
#
Lateral accel. 200 ft skidpan --- 0.95g ---------------- 0.94g
Balance ------------------------- moderate understeer -- moderate understeer
Speed 700ft slalom -------------- 67.0 mph ------------- 69.6 mph
Balance ------------------------- mild understeer ------ mild understeer


Fuel economy
#
Our driving ------ 16.6 mpg ----- 15.7 mpg
EPA city/highway - est 19/28 ---- 18/26
Cruise range ----- 282 miles ---- 250 miles
Fuel capacity ---- 18.0 gal ----- 16.9 gal (US)


Interior noise
#
Idle in neutral -- 64 dBA ------- 58 dBA
Max., 1st gear --- 83 dBA ------- 85 dBA
70 mph ----------- 77 dBA ------- 82 dBA


Drivetrain
#
Transmission ----- 6 speed manual ---- 6 speed manual
Gear ratio, overall ratio, (rpm) mph
1st --------------- 2.97/10.16/(6500) 50 ---------- 3.91/13.45/(7200) 41
2nd --------------- 2.07/ 7.08/(6500 72 ---------- 2.32/ 7.98/(7200) 69
3rd --------------- 1.43/ 4.89/(6500 104 ---------- 1.61/ 5.54/(7200) 100
4th --------------- 1.00/ 3.42/(6500 149 ---------- 1.28/ 4.40/(7200) 125
5th --------------- 0.71/ 2.43/(5600 186 ---------- 1.08/ 3.72/(7200) 148
6th --------------- 0.57/ 1.95/(4700) 186 ---------- 0.88/ 3.03/(7200) 182
Final drive ------- 3.42:1 ------------------------- 3.44:1
RPM @ 60 in top --- 1500 rpm ----------------------- 2300 rpm


Accommodations
#
Seating capacity ----- 2 ---------------- 2+2
Head room f/r -------- 36.5 in ---------- 38.5 in/30.5 in
Front-seat leg room -- 43.0 in ---------- 44.5 in
Rear-seat leg room --- na --------------- 18.0 in
Trunk space ---------- 13.3 cu ft ------- 4.8 cu ft

Engine
#
Type --------------- ohv 2-valve/cyl. V8 ---------- dohc 4-valve/cyl. flat 6
Displacement ------- 5967 cc ---------------------- 3824 cc
Bore x stroke ------ 101.6 x 92.0mm --------------- 99.0 x 82.8 mm
Compression ratio -- 10.9:1 ----------------------- 11.8:1
Horsepower (SAE) --- 400 bhp @ 6000 rpm ----------- 355 bhp @ 6600 rpm
Torque ------------- 400 lbft @ 4400 rpm ---------- 295 lbft @ 4600 rpm
Redline ------------ 6500 rpm --------------------- 7200 rpm
Fuel injection ----- elect. sequential port ------- elect. sequential port
rec. fuel ---------- prem unleaded, 93 pump oct --- pre unleaded, 91 pump oct


Chassis & body
#
Layout --------------- front engine, rear drive ------- rear engine, rear drive
Body/frame ----------- fibreglass composite/steel ----- unit steel/ alum. hood
Brakes --------------- 13.4 in vented & drilled f ----- 13.0 in vented & drilled f
--------------------- 13.0 in vented & drilled r ----- 13.0 in vented & drilled r
--------------------- vac. assist, ABS --------------- vac. assist, ABS
Wheels --------------- cast alloy --------------------- cast alloy
--------------------- 18x8.5 f, 19x10r --------------- 19x8J f, 19x11J r
Tyres ---------------- Goodyear Eagle F1 Super EMT ---- Michelin Pilot Sport
--------------------- P245/40ZR-18 88Y f ------------- 235/35ZR-19 87Y f
--------------------- P285/35ZR-19 90Y r ------------- 295/30ZR-19 100Y r
Steering ------------- rack & pinion, power assist ---- rack & pinion, power assist
Overall ratio -------- 16.1:1 ------------------------- est 17.1:1
Turns lock to lock --- 2.8 ---------------------------- 2.6
Suspension f --------- upper and lower A-arms --------- MacPherson strut, lower A-Arm
--------------------- transverse comp. leaf spring --- coil springs
--------------------- tube shocks -------------------- elec. adj. tube shocks
--------------------- anti roll bar ------------------ anti roll bar
Suspension r --------- upper & lower A-Arms ----------- multilink
--------------------- transverse comp. leaf spring --- coil springs
--------------------- tube shocks -------------------- elec. adj. tube shocks
--------------------- anti roll bar ------------------ anti roll bar

Corvette --- List price $43,445 Price as tested $53,815
Fitted options: 1SB pkg (inc. sport seats, head up display, dimming mirrors, heated seats, Bose audio, CD changer) $4360, Z51 performance suspension (inc. larger brakes) $1495, navigation $1400, polished wheels $1295, OnStar $695, XM radio $325, delivery charge $800.

carrera S -- List price $79,100 Price as tested $88,805
Fitted options: Navigation $2070, pwr seat pkg $1550, Bose audio $1390, 3-spoke wheel $990, sport chrono pkg $920, metallic paint $825, heated seats $480, dimming mirrors $385, coloured wheel crests $185, floormats $115, delivery charge $795.
 
From Car and Driver

Comparison test: Almost Supercars
Chevrolet Corvette Z51 vs. Porsche 911 Carrera

Can Porsche excellence hold off the bargain American bruiser? (Larry Webster)


We know what you're thinking: This is not a fair fight. In one corner there's the American value packed brute, the $44,245 Corvette. And in the other, a high-priced uber-coupe. Porsche's latest 911 (code-named 997), which costs a stunning $70,065.

Pitting cars with such wildly unequal prices (the 911 costs 58% more than the Corvette) is not our standard practice, but this comparo is different. Both of these are fantastically fast sports cars that are almost quick enough to be ranked as super cars but have prices that make them somewhat accessible. And whether they're used for commuting to work in reasonable comfort or for getting your g-jollies at the track, these cars can do both jobs. Plus, they're new or, shall we say, extnsively updated for 2005. These two legendary models both have an illustrious racing heritage, and they have at some point graced every enthusiasts wish list. Despite the price difference, they have competed against each other numerous times in these pages.

And to be frank, we needed some real competition to put up against the 'Vette. Only the $48,995 BMW M3 is even close in performance and price. But the M3's back seat makes it a different kind of car, and even with a sultry 333-hp in-line six, its firepower wouldn't be adequate.

So the task fell to Zuffenhausen's franchise player, the 911. For 2005, a freer breathing intake system yielded six more ponies from the 3.6 litre aluminium flat-six. The total now stands at 321, with torque the same, at 273 pound-feet. That's 12 fewer horses than the M3 has, but the 911 weighs about 200 fewer pounds.

Thanks to wider fender flares, the 911 has a slightly increased track front and rear. The combination of a front-strut and rear-multilink suspension carries over, but the development process has continued, and the entire system has been tweaked for the usual claims of a smoother ride and tighter handling.

There's a new interior, there are 18-inch wheels and tyres, and finally Porsche has gone back to the more upright headlight housings that we liked so much in the previous models. It's a typical array of detail improvements that Porsche says add to a major step forward. For the 911's sake, we hope so, because the 'Vette looks awfully strong.

Although the 'Vette, too, is an evolutionary version, its engine room received a serious bump. The aluminium V-8 is not only larger (5.7 to 6.0 litres) but also has a thumping 400 horses and 400 pound-feet of torque. The previous 'Vette had 50 fewer horses and 25 fewer pound-feet of torque when coupled to the six speed manual gearbox.

The Corvette also get a host of chassis changes, new bodywork, a new interior, and finally, such features as a navigation system and heated seats. For a car so capable, the base price of $44,245 is a genuine bargain. Ours came with the $1495 Z51 suspension package that offers shorter transmission ratios, grippier tyres, bigger brakes, and a transmission-oil cooler.
It's the track hound of the Corvette lineup. In addition, $8500 worth of nonperformance options brought it to a grand total of $54,240.

The 911 arrived with a navigation system, bi-xenon headlights, a Bose stereo system, and a few other options, for $76,195.

As a couple of advertised do-everything sports cars, we put them through our usual battery of performance tests, along with 500 miles of highway and back-road driving, and since these cars are meant for the occaisional romp at the track and we weren't popping for tyres, we spent a day lapping 1.9 mile GingerMan Raceway in South Haven, Michigan.

Don't rush off to the results chart just yet. We made an adjustment to our ballot that needs explaining. It's an attempt to rectify the price discrepancy between these cars.

Our ballot has 21 categories that are worth a varying number of points, from a minimum of 5 to a maximum of 25.
Drivers rate the cars in most categories, and others are calculated from dimensions or test results; then we average the scores and total the points. The car with the highest total wins. In our usual comparison tests, drivers can award a maximum of 10 points in the value category. But as we noted, the Porsche's price is 58% greater than the Chevrolet's - in a typical comparo the difference is closer to 15%. So for this test, the value category has a maximum of 20 points.

Considering that a perfect score in every category would be more than 200 points, this is a small change.
But it's one that allowed the voters to better consider each car's cost.

So, anyway, enough about points, here's how things played out.



Second place
Porsche 911 Carrera

The 911's classic, time weathered shape has never looked better. The wider fenders give a beefy, more purposeful look that compliments the silhouette. And the packaging benefits of the rear-engine layout are as handy as ever. For the first time, the 911 is longer than the Corvette. And the Porsche, at least, still has room for a couple of kids in the back seats.

So when it comes to handling, which is better, an engine in front or in back? For racing, the answer is neither - the mid engine design is clearly better, as demonstrated by every purpose-built race car. But what about street cars that offer at least some practicality?

We're not going to answer that one because, well, there is no simple answer. Here both of these cars are fantastic curve carvers. On the street, though, the nod goes to the 911.

We never found a patch of road that gave us a whiff of that "Oh, %#$@!" feeling that precedes some type of mid corner correction or wheel sawing. Editor-at-large Pat Bedard calls this "path accuracy". At speed, how accurately can you place the car? With the 911, the answer is in fractions of an inch; with the 'Vette it's in inches. This feeling is likely why the 911 went through the cones of our lanechange test 1.1 mph faster than the 'Vette. You can plant this car anywhere.

Although we were initially skeptical of the 911's variable ratio steering, we're believers now. The ratio quickens the farther you turn the wheel, but you don't notice it. The effort is light, but the steering is wonderfully accurate.

Bumps have no effect on trajectory. The suspension is nicely supple and not the least bit floaty. It's a lot like the suspenders of the BMW 3-series that we like so much. The 911 suspension is stiff enough to keep the chassis movements to a minimum and communicate irregularties to the driver but also resilient enough to absorb bumps and cushion blows.
The 911 pulled 0.97g on the skidpad, a tick less than the 'Vettes 0.98, but in every subjective handling category except one, the 911 outscored the 'Vette.

It also trailed the 'Vette in every speed contest except top gear acceleration, where the 'Vettes hugely tall top gear puts the Chevy at a disadvantage. You have to grin and bear the gut-wrenching, axle-hopping launch to make the Porsche go its quickest, but the 911 seems to outperform the spec sheet. The power-to-weight ratio is 23% poorer than the 'Vette's, but the 911's rear weight bias keeps things close until speeds rise. At 60 mph, the Porsche's 4.3-second time is only 0.2 second slower than the 'Vette's, but at 150, the gap is 3.5 seconds.

The 911, therefore, needed a major handling advantage to outrun the 'Vette at GingerMan. No such trump card arose. Like most recent 911s, this one predominantly understeers, so in GingerMans long corners, we had to wait seemingly forever to put the power down and accelerate out of the turns. The 911's best lap time of 1:37.95 was 2.3 seconds slower than the 'Vette's. That's an eternity in road racing.

Still, we love this Porsche. It has a visceral attitude that's been softened only enough so that the car is perfectly livable. We'd need just one hand to count the things we'd change, and the manual seat height adjuster that tilts the seat as it rises would be numeros dos.

Numero uno is the price. Would we pay an extra 5 grand, over the Corvette, for the 911? That's a no-brainer; absolutely. Fifteen? Probably, but we'd have to think about it. Twenty? Well, you already know our answer: no.



First place
Chevrolet Corvette Z51

We never thought this would be such a close match. After our first test of the C6 Corvette and before we'd piloted the new 911, we figured the Porsche was a mackerel, the Chevy a barracuda. But the 'Vette won by one measly point.

We even managed to wring a couple of 10ths out of the 'Vette's already stellar acceleration times. Chevy's sportster knifed to 60 mph in a scant 4.1 seconds, a couple of 10ths quicker than the 2005 yellow car we tested in September. This red car was a little slower in top-gear acceleration tests, so we don't think it was a particularly strong example. Or maybe we simply got better at launching it.

It's far from a stoplight special, though. "Very nice highway car - smooth, quiet, refined. At 80 mph, I can barely hear the engine. Plus, I could easily get comfortable in the new, attractive interior," wrote one tester.

But Chevy hasn't removed all the 'Vette's traditional character. This is still a brute. For one, you look out over a long, wide hood. Although the Corvette is an inch shorter than the 911, ask anyone which is the longer, and no one will get it right.
Between the two, we all preferred the more expansive view out the 911.

You can't argue with the 'Vette's capabilities, though. On back roads, it can pull some distance on the 911, but it really makes you work for it. Two comments from the test-driver logbook: "The 911 doesn't throw you around nearly as much as the 'Vette over bumpy curves, and it's noticeably more stable." And this: "With the 'Vette, you have to tell yourself it's going to stay glued to the road, but in the 911, there's no need to wonder." On the smooth racetrack, up-and-down motions were still present and the chassis moved around a lot more than we expected. Plus, as in the 911, it was a little tricky to feed in power while coming off the turns, but for a different reason. Where the 911 slid its front tyres, the Corvette was a little too eager to fishtail.

But that was the 'Vette's only vice, and in some ways it was an advantage. GingerMan has a lot of long, gradual curves, and if the 'Vette started to drift wide of the intended arc, a little added power could rotate the car back on line. We couldn't do that in the Porsche. And if we hung the tail out a little too far, it only took a quick dose of countersteering to put the car straight. The brakes, like those on the Porsche, didn't exhibit any fade during our 5 lap sessions.

There is, however, a numbness to the chassis that was especially apparent when compared with the Porsche, and that cost the 'Vette some points. The Chevy can be driven extremely quickly, but it doesn't inspire the same confidence as the Porsche. Although both these cars ride quite well, the 'Vette feels a little less buttoned down. It could use more precision and perhaps stiffer shocks.

The difference was most noticeable while braking. Stomp on the middle pedal in the 'Vette, and it practically stands on its nose, whereas the Porsche squats hard. The 911 stopped from 70 in only 150 feet, 14 fewer than the Corvette.

True, that difference is due largely to the Porsche's rear-weight bias, but taken as a complete car, the 911 has a tick more sharpness. The 'Vette's steering is lifeless in comparison to the 911's. Plus, Chevy could have done better with the shifter. The throws are short, but it's stiff, and it balks every once in a while at a gearchange. It's the opposite of the Porsche's precise and easy-moving rod.

We're talking nuances here; the difference in most categories amounted to only a point. The 911's added feel and precision must be what the extra money buys you, because despite the much lower price, the 'Vette still has more features, such as power seats, adjustable lumbar and side-bolster supports, and a nifty head-up readout showing lateral acceleration.

In the end, though, it was the 'Vette's outstanding value that carried the day, as it scored 20 points in that category to the 911's 15. It was a deficit the Porsche almost, but not quite, surmounted. As we've said before, for the money, there isn't a better sports car around.



Results
************************ Corvette *** Carrera

Vehicle
driver comfort (10) -------- 10 ---- 9
front-seat space (10) ------ 10 ---- 8
ergonomics (10) ------------ 9 ---- 9
trunk space (5) ------------ 5 ---- 5
features/amenities (10) ---- 10 ---- 8
fit and finish (10) -------- 9 ---- 10
styling (10) --------------- 9 ---- 9
value (20) ----------------- 20 ---- 15

Total (85) ----------------- 82 ---- 73

Powertrain
engine output (10) --------- 10 ---- 8
performance (10) ----------- 10 ---- 8
throttle response (10) ----- 10 ---- 10
engine NVH (10) ------------ 8 ---- 10
transmission (10) ---------- 8 ---- 10

Total (50) ----------------- 46 ---- 46

Chassis
performance (10) ----------- 9 ---- 10
steering feel (10) --------- 8 ---- 10
brake feel (10) ------------ 9 ---- 10
on-road handling (10) ------ 9 ---- 10
race-track handling (10) --- 9 ---- 9
ride (10) ------------------ 9 ---- 10

Total (60) ----------------- 53 ---- 59

gotta-have-it factor (25) -- 23 ---- 24
fun to drive (25) ---------- 22 ---- 23

Grand total (245) --------- 226 --- 225
Order --------------------- 1 --- 2


Chassis
Front suspension --------- control arms, leaf spring ---- strut, coil springs
------------------------- anti-roll bar ---------------- anti-roll bar
Rear suspension ---------- control arms, leaf spring ---- multilink, coil springs
------------------------- anti-roll bar ---------------- anti-roll bar
Front brakes ------------- vented disc ------------------ vented disc
Rear brakes -------------- vented disc ------------------ vented disc
Anti-lock control -------- yes -------------------------- yes
Stability control -------- yes -------------------------- yes
Tyres -------------------- Goodyear Eagle F1 ------------ Michelin Pilot Sport
------------------------- Super car EMT ---------------- Sport PS2
------------------------- F: P245/40ZR-18 88Y ---------- F: 235/40ZR-18 91Y
------------------------- R: P285/35ZR-19 90Y ---------- R: 265/40ZR-18 101Y
Braking 70-0 ------------- 164 ft ----------------------- 150 ft
300 ft skidpad ----------- 0.98g ------------------------ 0.97g
Lane change -------------- 66.8 mph --------------------- 67.9 mph


Powetrain

type ---------------- pushrod -- DOHC
-------------------- 16V V8 --- 24V flat 6
displacement -------- 364 (5.7)- 219 cu in (3.6 litre)
power, bhp @rpm ----- 400@6000 - 321@6800
torque, lbft @rpm --- 400@4400 - 273@4250
redline ------------- 6500 ----- 7200
lb per bhp ---------- 8.2 ----- 10.1
Transmission -------- 6-sp man - 6-sp man
driven wheels ------- rear ----- rear
Axle ratio ---------- 3.42 ----- 3.44
0-60 mph ------------ 4.1 ----- 4.3
0-100 mph ----------- 9.6 ----- 10.5
0-150 mph ----------- 25.0 ----- 28.5
1/4 mile ------------ 12.6@114 - 12.8@109
Rolling 5-60 -------- 5.1 ------ 5.3
30-50 top ----------- 10.3 ------ 7.6
50-70 top ------------ 9.6 ------ 7.9
Top speed ------------ 186 ------ 181


Sound level, dBA
Idle ------------------ 60 ------- 52
Full throttle --------- 86 ------- 83
70-mph cruise --------- 74 ------- 76

Fuel economy, mpg
EPA city -------------- 19 ------- 19
EPA highway ----------- 28 ------- 26
c/D 500-mile trip ----- 18 ------- 17


Base price ----------- $44,245 --- $70,065
Price as tested ------ $54,240 --- $76,195
Weight --------------- 2388 lbs -- 3253
Fuel tank ------------ 18.0 ------ 16.9
Rec. octane ---------- 93 -------- 91

Weight dist f/r ------ 52.1/47.9 - 38.4/61.6

Interior volume cu-ft
front ---------------- 52 -------- 48
rear ----------------- na -------- 16
trunk ---------------- 22 -------- 5


23 years of going nose to nose

We have put a 911 against a Corvette 5 times on these pages. Two of these encounters were multicar comparos, and three were head-to-heads. The first was in 1981, when we pitted four sports cars against the De Lorean. Even then, the 911's as-tested price of $34,165 seemed audacious when compared to the $19,000 'Vette. The horsepower numbers seem puny by today's weaponry standards: 172 for the Porsche and 190 for the Chevy. We didn't pick a winner or rank them, but it was clear the 911 easily had the 'Vette covered.

Fast forward to September 1988, and the tide had shifted. Against the 241-hp 911 Club Sport the 245-hp Corvette Z51 fell behind in acceleration tests but stormed ahead on the race and autocross courses. It was also about 15 grand cheaper, and it won.

Two years later, in a five-car roundup [September 1990], a $59,795 375-hp ZR-1, dubbed the "Corvette from Hell" finished a hellish third, one spot behind the $80,257 247-hp 911. Advantage Porsche.

And then a funny thing happened, In April 199, the ZR-1 went head-to-head with the most powerful 911 of the day, the $105,191 315-hp turbo model. It should've been a Porsche rout, but it wasn't - the 'Vette prevailed, due largely to a better-sorted suspension.

The next meeting came in May 1998. The 911 was strong for that meeting, besting the 'Vette to 60 mph and on the road course. But it wasn't enough to overcome the 30-grand price premium, and the 'Vette prevailed.

Do Porsche guys care that the score is now four to two for the 'Vette? Probably not.
 
Not really, just trying to give an alternative view.

If I lived in the US I would have a Corvette (for everyday and winter use - wouldn't give up the TT though). For around £25K (at the current exchange rate) you get a pretty good deal.
When it goes wrong you can just throw it away and buy another, and still save money over a 997 (and almost a Boxster). It'll cost less to run as well.

Whilst I used to think it a little presumptuous to compare the two, I know that GM has spent a lot of effort trying to bring the Corvette up. Whilst loved in the US, it doesn't do so well elsewhere.
Although I believe there is a waiting list and the factory is permanently at full capacity..
Why GM stick with the leaf springs I don't know, perhaps its a packaging issue. Mind you it's no worse than torsion bars. The double wishbones on each corner are not to be sniffed at though, and it's lighter than a 911.

What I found interesting was that the Corvette had better fuel economy (from a 6 litre).
Also that the 997 runs on 91 octane gas.

Whilst the 997 is better, the price premium you pay for the improvement, is large. Even more so at US prices.
The badge and image only count for so much.
Although to be fair, they admit that on lumpy roads (like we have) it gets a bit unsettled.

In the UK we don't really have the same competition. The AM V8 will be the true test, but that will be at the same price point so money doesn't cloud the decision making.

 

Posts made and opinions expressed are those of the individual forum members

Use of the Forum is subject to the Terms and Conditions

Disclaimer

The opinions expressed on this site are not necessarily those of the Club, who shall have no liability in respect of them or the accuracy of the content. The Club assumes no responsibility for any effects arising from errors or omissions.

Porsche Club Great Britain gives no warranties, guarantees or assurances and makes no representations or recommendations regarding any goods or services advertised on this site. It is the responsibility of visitors to satisfy themselves that goods and/or services supplied by any advertiser are bona fide and in no instance can the Porsche Club Great Britain be held responsible.

When responding to advertisements please ensure that you satisfy yourself of any applicable call charges on numbers not prefixed by usual "landline" STD Codes. Information can be obtained from the operator or the white pages. Before giving out ANY information regarding cars, or any other items for sale, please satisfy yourself that any potential purchaser is bona fide.

Directors of the Board of Porsche Club GB, Club Office Staff, Register Secretaries and Regional Organisers are often requested by Club members to provide information on matters connected with their cars and other matters referred to in the Club Rules. Such information, advice and assistance provided by such persons is given in good faith and is based on the personal experience and knowledge of the individual concerned.

Neither Porsche Club GB, nor any of the aforementioned, shall be under any liability in respect of any such information, advice or assistance given to members. Members are advised to consult qualified specialists for information, advice and assistance on matters connected with their cars at all times.

Back
Top