Menu toggle

Brake Fluid

ORIGINAL: 964RS Use ATE Super Blue racing. DOT 4. It's excellent on the track. [:)]
Completely agree, I tried dot 5.1 (generic & branded) after my brakes overheated at my first trackday, they still boiled just the same. Now use Racing Blue & haven't boiled it since, it's no longer the weakest link, and I've had no problems (that I wouldn;t otherwise have had) with the fluid in normal use either. Then I started to get a hard 'dead' pedal from heatsoak (pads/disk too hot), added the early turbo brake ducts & they no longer overheat at all. Standard pads (so far) too [;)]
 
So - ive not long had a complete brake fluid change and the fluid is as clean as is....

But I just wondered what you guys used??... I guess the more common is DOT 4... When I ran my very modded Saab 9000 which had yellow stuff pads and brembo disks - I changed the fluid to DOT5.1 (dont use DOT 5!) and the brake feel straight away was MUCH better on track and road use.

Just wondered if anyone has used DOT5.1 in there 944 and how much better it was over DOT4?

Cheers A
 
No need to buy anything expensive for road use - any dot 4 should be fine. I use Motul RBF 600, bu that's for track use. I wouldn't bother spending the extra for the road. Brake feel is very different with new pads - travel gets much longer with well worn pads.
 
ORIGINAL: eastendr Castrol SRF ....
Same here, I boil the ATE fluid, but SRF is fine (I think it still boils/overflows slightly, but the pedal stays firm). I'm led to believe it is quite hygroscopic, so a yearly change is recommended (or more regularly if you race of course). I used to use Castrol Response (a cheaper option) and that was good too, but not in the same league as SRF.
 
Yeah - was just mainly interested if people had noticed a diif between DOT4 and DOT5.1 for 'fast' road use as I did in my saab (which my son named KITT... lol jeez tho it was quick - it was the 'Turbo Boost' that did it for him..)
 
Be careful trying DOT 5.1 in some cars it can swell the seals, some Alfas suffer this. If I ever rebuild mine completely I'm going Silicone which is DOT 5 no hassle with moisture & rusty brake bits! I've run it in the past & had no problems & a guy who sprinted a Cat 7 used it again no issues.
 
No need to buy anything expensive for road use - any dot 4 should be fine
True 5.1 is hygroscopic (absorbs water) so needs changing every year. ATE blue or SRF if tracking the car
 
Dot 4 is hygroscopic, didn't know dot 5.1 was as well, being synthetic I assumed they might have sorted this (DOT 5 is silicone and not) . I use halfords 5.1 I believe its the same as the Castrol 5.1 - certainly same shape bottle and identical specs. I found when hot it expands, at the Nurburgring with reasonably fresh pads and fluid (about 1000 miles) it expanded enough to overflow the cylinder. I use it on road and track and havent had any issues I change it every couple of years. I quite like EBC yellows as well as a road /track compromise but maybe I am less hard on the brakes than some. (hate Reds though) Tony
 
It doesnt mix with other glycol-ether brake fluids. DOT5 is silicone but DOT5.1 is mineral based, like DOT4 et al...
 
Remember too that even if you can completely clean the system of glycol-ether fluid then silicone fluid (so that your seals wont give leading to total brake failure!) isnt suitable for use in a car equipped with ABS.
 
ORIGINAL: Hilux
Dot 4 is hygroscopic, didn't know dot 5.1 was as well
Its not [8|][8|] its a typo, sorry - Note to self: must not rush type when replying
You were right originally: DOT5.1 fluid IS hygroscopic. DOT5 is silicone based and it isnt hygroscopic, but it isnt compatible with cars previously run using mineral fluids.
 
Not really no, because the two fluid types dont mix. If youre happy that you can completely and absolutely flush your system of mineral based fluid then it will work perfectly well, but how can you do that? Id use 5.1 which will mix and has a higher boiling point.
 

Posts made and opinions expressed are those of the individual forum members

Use of the Forum is subject to the Terms and Conditions

Disclaimer

The opinions expressed on this site are not necessarily those of the Club, who shall have no liability in respect of them or the accuracy of the content. The Club assumes no responsibility for any effects arising from errors or omissions.

Porsche Club Great Britain gives no warranties, guarantees or assurances and makes no representations or recommendations regarding any goods or services advertised on this site. It is the responsibility of visitors to satisfy themselves that goods and/or services supplied by any advertiser are bona fide and in no instance can the Porsche Club Great Britain be held responsible.

When responding to advertisements please ensure that you satisfy yourself of any applicable call charges on numbers not prefixed by usual "landline" STD Codes. Information can be obtained from the operator or the white pages. Before giving out ANY information regarding cars, or any other items for sale, please satisfy yourself that any potential purchaser is bona fide.

Directors of the Board of Porsche Club GB, Club Office Staff, Register Secretaries and Regional Organisers are often requested by Club members to provide information on matters connected with their cars and other matters referred to in the Club Rules. Such information, advice and assistance provided by such persons is given in good faith and is based on the personal experience and knowledge of the individual concerned.

Neither Porsche Club GB, nor any of the aforementioned, shall be under any liability in respect of any such information, advice or assistance given to members. Members are advised to consult qualified specialists for information, advice and assistance on matters connected with their cars at all times.

Back
Top