Menu toggle

Facelift Boxster Details are out - official Porsche info

Each upgrade of the Boxster has always made it beter and better. I'm sure the latest models will be no exception.

However, the current and recent models are so good, and such good value that the cost to change is going to be harder to justify.

 
"Is this a true roadster? ..... indeed ....... its a Porsche. Have we inspired you?"

Great video.

I think I'll have to stick with my 1999 model for the moment!

 
So the 'S' is 3.4 litre - I don't have to eat my hat after all.

I wonder if the knowledge of the "completely new" Boxster (possibly a collaboration with Audi) being just round the corner is going to put a dent in sales?
 
ORIGINAL: spyderman
So the 'S' is 3.4 litre - I don't have to eat my hat after all.
I wonder if the knowledge of the "completely new" Boxster (possibly a collaboration with Audi) being just round the corner is going to put a dent in sales?

I would think the next generation Boxster would be 2011 MY.
 
yep nice guess ..........you probably have just had your chrystal ball serviced .... keep it up !!! [:D]

ORIGINAL: spyderman

So the 'S' is 3.4 litre - I don't have to eat my hat after all.

I wonder if the knowledge of the "completely new" Boxster (possibly a collaboration with Audi) being just round the corner is going to put a dent in sales?
 
ORIGINAL: oliver

Each upgrade of the Boxster has always made it beter and better. I'm sure the latest models will be no exception.

However, the current and recent models are so good, and such good value that the cost to change is going to be harder to justify.

There's not a long wrong with the first incarnations. (IMHO).
 
apart from bigger and imo droopier rear lights and possibly more vertical headlights (and the led things which i never liked) i can't see too much dfference........blackboxsa i have to agree!
 
The brochure for the new Boxster landed on my doormat yesterday.

Wow, 10 more BHP, 2 miles an hour quicker, 0.2 sec faster to 60 MPH, and fairy lights at the front and back.
 
It seems to me that most of you are missing the point about this facelift. Surely THE significant change is the engine?? Fussy stuff like light changes is only imposed by EU regulations anyway but the engine change is a MASSIVE change. Redesigned without the intermediate shaft (so no chance of a failure) and, no doubt, a redesigned RMS to boot, the new engine is the reason why earlier models are likely to be considered inferior for year to come.

Regards

Dave
 
Dave,
I agree with your comments, also it brings the emissions down to a lower VED band (F).
Do you have any more details about the engine changes such as, has the 2.7 been stroked to 2.9 or bored, are there any power an torque curves v's 2.7? The 2.9 is non-DFi whereas the 3.4 is DFi, why?
Where did you find these details of the mechanical changes you refer to?
Chris
 
Where did he find out the details ....he asked the car valeter at the OPC they know more than some off the sales staff[:D][:D][:D] I think I will just hold on to my 987 that way I have 0 depreciation and perhaps by 2011 I can afford a change
 
Porsche's own press release states:

"The highlight of the new generation is the six-cylinder boxer engines developed as completely new power units from the ground up, displacing 2.9 liters in the Boxster and 3.4 liters in the Boxster S. Indeed, these engines belong to the same family as the particularly efficient power units introduced only recently in the 911 model series.

The new "basic" engine now develops maximum output of 255 bhp (188 kW) at 6,400 rpm, up 10 bhp over the previous model with 2.7 liters capacity. Featuring Direct Fuel Injection, the six-cylinder in the Boxster S churns out 15 bhp more than before, now offering 310 bhp (228 kW), again at 6,400 rpm.
"

The media coverage on this new engine, when announced for the 911 was massive on web sites such as Driver Republic where they went into considerable detail about the engine design, the oiling system and the complex test rig that Porsche built to replicate the demands of a circuit around the Nordschleife as well as the PDK gearbox.

I'm guessing that the new 2.9 litre engine showed significant improvements in efficiency and emissions without the cost of DFI to allow a better model to model differentiation. As the press release says, the "new" engine is exactly that - all new from the ground up, not just a modified 2.7. The big news is the deletion of the intermediate shaft which completely eliminates the big bugbear of the previous design. If it ain't there it can't break!!

In my view it's a real shame that Porsche didn't come up with this engine design a long time ago because every water cooled Boxer engined car they have produced (with the obvious exception of the GT1-based Turbo/GT2/GT3) has to carry forward the burden of an obviously flaky design. As the early cars are now coming to the age where they cannot be warrantied one has to ask who would be brave enough to buy one? We are already seeing early Boxsters hitting sub-£10K prices and I can't see it being long before early 996s are doing the same.

Regards

Dave
 
ORIGINAL: Dave Wilkinson
In my view it's a real shame that Porsche didn't come up with this engine design a long time ago because every water cooled Boxer engined car they have produced (with the obvious exception of the GT1-based Turbo/GT2/GT3) has to carry forward the burden of an obviously flaky design. As the early cars are now coming to the age where they cannot be warrantied one has to ask who would be brave enough to buy one? We are already seeing early Boxsters hitting sub-£10 prices and I can't see it being long before early 996s are doing the same.

Regards

Dave

You are making a big assumption there that every M96 engine is destined to have an intermediate shaft failure.
 
ORIGINAL: JCB..
You are making a big assumption there that every M96 engine is destined to have an intermediate shaft failure.

John,

The real pity of the situation is that EVERY M96 engine DOES have the POTENTIAL to have an intermediate shaft failure. It doesn't have to be destined to have a failure to scare off buyers - it's the fear that it might that does the damage.

Regards

Dave
 

Posts made and opinions expressed are those of the individual forum members

Use of the Forum is subject to the Terms and Conditions

Disclaimer

The opinions expressed on this site are not necessarily those of the Club, who shall have no liability in respect of them or the accuracy of the content. The Club assumes no responsibility for any effects arising from errors or omissions.

Porsche Club Great Britain gives no warranties, guarantees or assurances and makes no representations or recommendations regarding any goods or services advertised on this site. It is the responsibility of visitors to satisfy themselves that goods and/or services supplied by any advertiser are bona fide and in no instance can the Porsche Club Great Britain be held responsible.

When responding to advertisements please ensure that you satisfy yourself of any applicable call charges on numbers not prefixed by usual "landline" STD Codes. Information can be obtained from the operator or the white pages. Before giving out ANY information regarding cars, or any other items for sale, please satisfy yourself that any potential purchaser is bona fide.

Directors of the Board of Porsche Club GB, Club Office Staff, Register Secretaries and Regional Organisers are often requested by Club members to provide information on matters connected with their cars and other matters referred to in the Club Rules. Such information, advice and assistance provided by such persons is given in good faith and is based on the personal experience and knowledge of the individual concerned.

Neither Porsche Club GB, nor any of the aforementioned, shall be under any liability in respect of any such information, advice or assistance given to members. Members are advised to consult qualified specialists for information, advice and assistance on matters connected with their cars at all times.

Back
Top