ORIGINAL: karlj0
Has anybody got any experience with this stuff ? / Will it be ok for my car ?
Coming back to the original point made in this thread, I think that this is a very interesting question at the moment. I have concerns that in the drive to become SM approved, Mobil 1 & some other oils will become less suitable for our
air-cooled 911s. I would suggest to everyone who has not read this thread to have a read of it at least once, as I did:
http://www.lnengineering.com/oil.html
I am very unsure about what to put in my car at the next oil change. To summarise from what I've read so far:
Mobil 1 has lower levels of zinc & phosphorous than it used to. Of course manufacturers won't disclose this information directly to us, but read the article, it's interesting. These are essential for anti-wear and our air cooled 911s put the anti-wear properties of our oil under much greater pressure than water-cooled engines (larger valve gear, flat tappets, hotter-running, more hot-spots in air-cooled engines etc). Okay, boron is used in the latest formulations to minimise wear but this is largely unproven so far & fuels have to be ultra low sulphur for it to work.
Also, imagine your engine, sitting there in the garage for a week or three as many of our engines must do, before you come out & start it up. Non-polar PAO type IV oils like Mobil 1 are not attracted to metal surfaces & will just run downwards off bearings, cylinder bores etc under the force of gravity, leaving your engine potentially unprotected during those crucial start-up seconds/minutes. Okay, some of the additives might counteract this but they will be degraded/diluted with time & miles.
I know it's controversial, but I cant' get away from the temptation to put Fuchs, Motul or Silkolene ESTER-based oil in my car at the next oil change. Esters are polar, so stick to metal much better than PAO-based oils. They are the base stock used in aircraft engines - designed to withstand much higher shear forces than would be found in a humble car engine. There
must be some significance to the fact that they are the gold standard for lubrication in jet engines.
You may say "yes but they are not Porsche-approved". This approval process involves the oil producer paying Porsche to analyse their oil & if it passes, it's okay. If the producer doesn't think it's worth the cost, they won't be Porsche-approved. Maybe some producers think that Mobil 1 has the Porsche market cornered? I have been reliably informed that Silkolene Pro-S 5W-40 for example (a top ester-based oil) easily attains all the anti-shear, temperature stability, anti-foaming etc standards that Porsche-approved oils do. Also, I believe that it was approved in the past - anyone know about this? I suspect that the ester-based oil producers, who make their oil for use in top racing engines etc etc don't think it's worth getting Porsche-approved for a potentially small amount of revenue.
Okay, many of you will say "I'll just use an approved oil for peace of mind", but with the new SM standard coming in to supposedly protect
catalytic converters, potentially at a cost to some engines, I think we need to think about this.
Interestingly Mobil 1 MX4T motorcycle oil is a possibility - not officially approved but Mobil 1!!!??? It has nice high zinc & phosphorous levels to protect our older air-cooled engines' flat tappets against wear & is designed for air-cooled bike engines (c.f. our 911 engines). It's designed for bike engines, which run at much higher RPM than our engines. It's also 10W-40, so really shouldn't be too viscous when cold in our climate. Some in the USA are moving to this - just check out Rennlist or the Pelican forum, it's fascinating & an eye-opener.
Pleeaassee give me some logical replies to these hypotheses. It might be time to think outside the box if we want 200K-plus 993 engines that haven't had rebuilds.
I've still got an open mind, a bit like karlj0! [8|]
Roddy