Menu toggle

NEW SLK v Old 2.7 Boxster v Z4

daro911

PCGB Member
Member
This weeks Autocar June 1-7th makes interesting reading and the punchlines are as follows:-

SLK350 £34270 0-60 5.6secs 0-100 13.6 secs 30-50 in 4th/6 gears 4.6 secs 1465kg

Z4 3.0 £30855 0-60 5.8 secs 0-100 15.00 secs 30-50 in 4th/6 gears 5.0 secs 1290kg

Boxster 2.7 £31630 0-60 6.3 secs 0-100 15.2 secs 30-50 in 4th/5 gears 6.4 secs 1275kg

Main Summary:-

SLK 4.5/5 stars Leagues ahead of its predecessor. The SLK blends refinement and agility with immense desirability Porsche is the best to drive but SLK is the best car it wins [:eek:]

Z4 4/5 stars An accomplished car by any standards, but in such talented company the Z4 feels outclassed.

Boxster 4/5 stars Though the Boxster is just starting to show its age, it is still the benchmark sports roadster [;)]

You already know the sports car of the bunch is the Boxster [8D] Its mid engined layout is bespoke and not built over the platform of a high volume saloon like the Z4 & SLK. If you crave directness and feel of steering, supreme body control, responsive handling and an engine that yearns to rev, look no further [:D] YET the new SLK achieves 90% of the Boxster's driving ability - for some, that last 10% is critical of course and adds a far broader spread of appeal. Seems a Boxster "S" would have made for a more valid comparison.

SO WHY DIDN'T THEY GO THAT ROUTE BEFORE SETTING OFF ON THIS TEST [:mad:]
 
ORIGINAL: jonathansbuk

The Boxster S is also more expensive so not really a valid comparison IMO.

Peter Robinson writing the article concluded that as the SLK350 came to a mouth watering £41505 with over 7K's worth of extra goodies, they maybe should have opted for the £38383 Boxster "S" which obviously would have been a fairer test as far as bhp, number of gogs in the box and bigger brakes etc go .... IMO that would have easily closed down the substantial performance differences this test through up.
 

Posts made and opinions expressed are those of the individual forum members

Use of the Forum is subject to the Terms and Conditions

Disclaimer

The opinions expressed on this site are not necessarily those of the Club, who shall have no liability in respect of them or the accuracy of the content. The Club assumes no responsibility for any effects arising from errors or omissions.

Porsche Club Great Britain gives no warranties, guarantees or assurances and makes no representations or recommendations regarding any goods or services advertised on this site. It is the responsibility of visitors to satisfy themselves that goods and/or services supplied by any advertiser are bona fide and in no instance can the Porsche Club Great Britain be held responsible.

When responding to advertisements please ensure that you satisfy yourself of any applicable call charges on numbers not prefixed by usual "landline" STD Codes. Information can be obtained from the operator or the white pages. Before giving out ANY information regarding cars, or any other items for sale, please satisfy yourself that any potential purchaser is bona fide.

Directors of the Board of Porsche Club GB, Club Office Staff, Register Secretaries and Regional Organisers are often requested by Club members to provide information on matters connected with their cars and other matters referred to in the Club Rules. Such information, advice and assistance provided by such persons is given in good faith and is based on the personal experience and knowledge of the individual concerned.

Neither Porsche Club GB, nor any of the aforementioned, shall be under any liability in respect of any such information, advice or assistance given to members. Members are advised to consult qualified specialists for information, advice and assistance on matters connected with their cars at all times.

Back
Top