Menu toggle

Oh no, not tyres again!!

SimonExtreme

New member
So, by the end of the day I will own some new rubber.

Having decided to not 2 "follow the herd" so that was MCPS and Corsas out the window. So I thought it was a straight fight between the Toyo R888 and the Yoko 048. Then my bro tells me that all the sprint/hillclimb records are being broken by Stunner Scudo's so I started to look at them and sure enough, they are as cheap as chips and available in the right size. Further research then found.......MARANGONI Zeta Linea which, and I quote are "the same construction as Stunner's Scudo but with a softer compound ! Very popular with speed event competitors for their excellent grip characteristics". Only problem is that for the rear, the biggest they do is 245/40/17.

So, the choices are

Toyo R888
Yoko 048
Stunner Scudo
Margangoni Zeta Linea

Any views!
 
Perhaps you should read some of your favourite magazines from 1992 to get the answer? After all, what does anyone else know about tyres? Modern technology and advances... pah, it's overrated. I suspect that you may find most 1992 tyres the "better" choice and the "sharper tool" on track... [:D][:D][:D][;)]

If you don't manage to find a Pirelli P700 from c.1992, you could try the R888... but don't complain if you find it too "compromised" a tyre for your taste... luckily for you it's Japanese so would be in its natural habitat on your RHD car... don't let anyone tell you that they do a LHD version either which was built in more limited/exclusive numbers... [;)]
 
Adrien

As usual, your inability to read astounds me! You will give GT3 owners a bad name![;)]

If you were trying to be clever by paraphrasing what I said in another thread, you really need to be more accurate. As you found with your suspension, accuracy makes a great deal of difference[;)] The quotes about the964RS being sharper etc than a GT3 came from a 2006 article but hey, why let a little thing like accuracy get in the way of a good micky take[:D]

Just as a point of interest, have you driven a 964RS? Or have you only been a passenger? Or are your comments based on what you read?
 
Back on tyres,,,, I have run Dunlop D01J on road track on my last 2 993.....they have been fine,,,but the reports of price and performance of the Toyo 888 makes them my next choice of rubber.

*An observation and not intended to start a war*, but the wear rate sounds good from reports of Gt3 track use, I am hoping the lighter 964/93 cars are able to improve on this?
Not heard any reports of earlier RS owners having used this up to now.....which of us is to be the guinea pig Simon?
 
A guy called Francis who posts on piston heads has a 964 RS and has been running the 888 toyo's. Says they're awesome. Obviously very subjective depending on what the previous tyres were.
 
Right. Having done a fair bit of research, I have a few answers and a decision!

First thing I learnt is that the stickiest tyres are no use for trackdays but until now, I didn't know why! I do now. The list I have produced above consists of 2 types of tyres and the types are not interchangable. In one group you have the Toyo's and Yoko's and you can add MPCS, Corsa's Dunlops etc. In the other you have the Stunners and Margangoni's. You can also add Kumho's plus a couple of others to the second group.

The first group are great road legal trackday/race tyres but they wouldn't last long on the road and aren't particularly nice for road use anyway. Besides noise and comfort, they can become particularly scary at 11.00pm on a dark road in heavy rain. Aquaplane and hedgerow/crash barrier are words that spring to mind.

The second group of tyres are actually very suited to the road, are safe in the wet and shouldn't aquaplane any more than other performance road tyres. Yet, it is this group of tyres that will give you the best grip and the fastest lap times! So, in sprints/hillclimbs, these tyres will whip the a#ses of those on the first group. However, while these tyres are great on the road, they would be destroyed on trackdays.

To a simpleton like me, it seemed totally illogical that a tyre that was stunningly good for grip but wouldn't last more than half a dozen track laps could be really good on the road.

Now all if this might not be new to some, but it was to me and more importantly, understanding why has been a revelation.

It seems that the best sprint/hillclimb tyres are, almost an accident. In fact, the success of the Stunner Scudo's in UK hillclimb/sprints has, quite literally, been a mistake! I know this will develop into one of those Urban Legends but............... chap goes to have his road legal hillclimb tyres fitted the day before a competition. On arrival at the tyre specialists, they couldn't find the tyres and it was too late to get any more. Rather than miss the event, he was given a special deal on their cheapest "performance" tyres of the right size. They were the Scudo's which nobody had heard of but they had the right rating and so thats what he got. Next day, he blows away the oposition and sets a class record for the hill. Based on his past performance, this came as a bit of a shock and the tyres were given the credit and they are now the tyre of choice in certain classes, with records falling like something that falls a lot!! (or at least that is what my bro tells me).

So, you might think, if they are good on the road and great for hillclimbs, they should be good on the track. Wrong!!! The problem is tyre construction and tread design. Great for the road but because there is so much "block" caused by the groves, when they get too hot it all goes pear shaped! This photo shows hwat I mean
7678-7593-main-stunerscudo-583.jpg



However, in road use they never get up to temperatures that cause problems and therefore they are great. So, there is a class of tyres that if you want to be super quick over one lap and drive on the road in confidence, you really can. Now, the tyre I like the look of is the Margangoni Zeta Linea. These tyres dominate the German hillclimb scene and also have great success in their home country of Italy (must be good in reverse;)) They look like
7560-7444-main-marangoni_zeta_linea-580.jpg


Now, how cool do they look, knowing that they are the stickiest thing since sticky toffee pudding!! The grooves give you confidence in the wet just looking at them! Best of all, they are cheap as chips (just over £400 fitted)

So, there you have it. The tyres that will give you the fastest lap time are ideally suited to the road and wet yet are nearly useless for trackdays! However, as I am close to needing replacements for the S-02's and Judgement Day is nearly on us, guess what I might be buying :D :D

Now to the other group of tyres, those designed for track use. Again, I have been looking at these and have spoken to many. I would have 2 sub groups, namely Old Skool (Cups and Corsas) and Young Turks (Toyo 888 and Yoko 048) I am not sure where to put the dunlops but I think in the first group. I am not talking about which is better by the groupings, its just that one group we understand, the other we don't. Now, the safe option is to stick to Old Skool and there has been enough on so I won't expand.

However, I have done a lot of research into the 888 vs 048 story. It seems that both Toyo and Yoko agree that in the hands of a top race driver, the Yoko's are a bit quicker but might be a little more unpredictable. Toyo are pushing themselves as a great tyre for everybody, Yoko are trying to appeal to the macho side in us (my interpretation). I would be happy with either and when I buy a trackday tyre, it will be one of them, probably based on price. Therefore, I think it would be the Toyo 888's for me.

What this has shown me, yet again, is that you cannot get one set of tyres to do everything. However, I used to think that if you did trackdays, sprints/hillclimbs and wanted to do some road driving as well, you needed 3 sets of wheels and tyres. Now, I believe you only need 2.

I hope that, if all goes to plan, I will have something a bit special on the car for Judgement Day which won't leave me wondering if I need wet or dry tyres. So, yet again, I am setting myself up to have no excuses. As usual, when I try something different, I will write a full report on progress.
 

ORIGINAL: SimonExtreme
Just as a point of interest, have you driven a 964RS? Or have you only been a passenger?

Yes I have! Both! 964RS is a bloody good car (and imho, looks good too), but I think the GT3 is the superior machine in all departments.
 
And to prove that Adrien loves his car, here is a smashing picture taken at the Ace last Saturday.....

Did he ever lavish such love on his mere 'air-cooled' 993 I wonder [&:]

PP
[8D]



1BA1362468684D178AAA560AB1B211E4.jpg
 

ORIGINAL: pilotpaul

And to prove that Adrien loves his car, here is a smashing picture taken at the Ace last Saturday.....

Did he ever lavish such love on his mere 'air-cooled' 993 I wonder [&:]

PP
[8D]

1BA1362468684D178AAA560AB1B211E4.jpg

[:D] You can't imagine how much breathless love the old girl had... [:D]
P1010616_800px.jpg

 
Adrien

I guess love is blind, but you could say that about me as well. However, IMO, you do your credibility absolutely no good by making comments like "964RS is a bloody good car (and imho, looks good too), but I think the GT3 is the superior machine in ALL departments." It flys in the face of what almost everybody else says, but hey, you are entitled to your own opinion. At least we are both happy with our respective cars.

BTW, I have changed my mind about you being in road repair (digging holes). I suspect you are a barrister. They are good at arguing cases that they probably know are incorrect and they have to remain consistant. On that basis, I suspect we have the new George Carman in our midst[:D]

 
Simon,

Don't worry about Adrien....his absolute devotion to his 'new' car and the fact it is better in all departments is probably just a placebo effect[;)]

[:D][:D][:D]
 
Digging holes? What holes? If you look back over the past couple of threads, Simon, you will notice that I've actually said very little! Everyone knows you know best, so we just let you keep talking... [:D][;)] After all, everyone is entitled to an opinion! BTW, my credibility went down the drain a LONG time ago, so no worries bud, I have no concerns over what remains of my credibility... especially if it's my credibility in your opinion! [8|][:D]

Right, I'm off to the 'Ring for a few days! Have fun...
 
Simon,

Interesting but can you answer a couple of questions?
Margangoni Zeta Linea's don't appear to do a 255/40 or has that changed?
I can cope with the idea that these tyres are better at lower temperature, but does that really offset the reduction in rubber on the road (all those grooves) or the reduction in tread stability (all those grooves)?

Both the Marangoni & Stunner are list 1a tyres which may explain part of their popularity in sprints/hillclimbs.

Most competitors in the clubs speed championship (which allows 1b tyres) are running Khumos which are Very soft, but one or two now using the R888. This includes the quickest of the 964RS drivers who is regularly finishing in the top 3 and recons they suite the weight of the car, warming up quickly.

If you buy the Marangoni keep us posted - at the price they could just be the tyre bargain of the year.

Tony
 
Tony

I have the Marangoni's on the car. Just picked it up. Normal price is £410 fitted etc so I think its worth a try.

You are right about the 1a vs 1b and its amazing just how the stunners have taken off as the 1a tyre to have. In addition, in Caterham, they have proven to be as quick as any 1b radial although the best 1b cross ply is about 2 secs quicker. Now, the Marangoni's are meant to be noticably quicker than the Stunners, so it should be interesting. My brother reports that track gossip is that Stunners may be reclasified next year!

You are also right that the Marangoni's are only available as a 245 but I have checked the tyre loadings and all is well. So the question is, does the extra width really make a difference. I will let you know for sure but based on the use I want from the tyres, I don't have any concerns. I am sure that 245's in these are a lot stickier than 255's in the S-02's. Having had them fitted, they don't look "wrong" either.

You ask about all the grooves and how that might effect performance (not so much rubber on the road) but I suspect that is something that helps in sprints/hillclimbs and is why they are no good on the track. That type of design allows heat into the tyre quickly and I am sure that a more than a few laps of a track would see problems. However, although not as extreme, the Kumho's have a more noticable tread pattern than, say, the R888's.

I have bought these tyres for a bit of education and for Judgement Day. I was going to buy R888's and keep my S-02's ready for if it was a wet day. However, I get back from overseas at 11.00pm on the sunday and need to be at the venue by 8.00am in the morning so I thought sleep rather than car prep would lead to better times. In addition, the S-02's will need replacing soon so these tyres are fine as a replacement. At that money, they don't exactly have to last very long.

The question is how they perform. First thing I noticed is that just using the finger nail test, they feel to be far softer than the S-02's. And then, in the space of one hour I experienced everything from dry road to scary aquaplane standing water. Even with the tyres being greasy and fresh, they are noticably more grippy in all the conditions experienced so far, compared with the S-02's. I need to drive more to really confirm this and there might be a placibo or wishfull thinking effect, but I don't think so. One little test I did, is that I know that with the S-02's, if I am cruising at 4000 rpm in 2nd gear and floor it on a damp road, I get wheel spin. Although I might have been cautious due to the newness of the tyres, I didn't get break away with the new tyres. ATM, I would say "so far, so good".

I am pretty convinced I have probably the best 1a list tyre on my car. How much they bridge the gap between 1a and 1b, only time will tell. From cold or in the damp, I am pretty sure they will be better than the R888's up to the point that the R888's get warm enough and it will be interesting to see how things go at Judgement Day. However, I also suspect I have a tyre which would be a complete nightmare on trackdays. As I said above, I suspect that the ideal for me will be a set of R888's and these. If I were sprinting properly, I would have to do some testing to see if I would need another set. I suspect maybe not on the basis on the shorter and less "tyre heating" courses, the Marangoni's would be OK and on other types, you would use the R888's.

However, its all speculation and time will tell. At the moment, I don't feel like I have wasted £400[:)]
 
Simon, thanks for the review..one thing I didn't catch....I assume the Maragonis are CE approved for road use?
 
ORIGINAL: clubsport

Simon, thanks for the review..one thing I didn't catch....I assume the Maragonis are CE approved for road use?
They had better be as they are sold as a road tyre! In addition, for them to be in the "blue book" as a list 1a tyre, they have to be. I haven't been out to check the letters on the car but I think I can safely say "YES".
 
Adrien, I just spotted myself in that picture with the 993 in the foreground. Thats me in the white shirt and the shorts. I had alot of grip in those sandals
 

Posts made and opinions expressed are those of the individual forum members

Use of the Forum is subject to the Terms and Conditions

Disclaimer

The opinions expressed on this site are not necessarily those of the Club, who shall have no liability in respect of them or the accuracy of the content. The Club assumes no responsibility for any effects arising from errors or omissions.

Porsche Club Great Britain gives no warranties, guarantees or assurances and makes no representations or recommendations regarding any goods or services advertised on this site. It is the responsibility of visitors to satisfy themselves that goods and/or services supplied by any advertiser are bona fide and in no instance can the Porsche Club Great Britain be held responsible.

When responding to advertisements please ensure that you satisfy yourself of any applicable call charges on numbers not prefixed by usual "landline" STD Codes. Information can be obtained from the operator or the white pages. Before giving out ANY information regarding cars, or any other items for sale, please satisfy yourself that any potential purchaser is bona fide.

Directors of the Board of Porsche Club GB, Club Office Staff, Register Secretaries and Regional Organisers are often requested by Club members to provide information on matters connected with their cars and other matters referred to in the Club Rules. Such information, advice and assistance provided by such persons is given in good faith and is based on the personal experience and knowledge of the individual concerned.

Neither Porsche Club GB, nor any of the aforementioned, shall be under any liability in respect of any such information, advice or assistance given to members. Members are advised to consult qualified specialists for information, advice and assistance on matters connected with their cars at all times.

Back
Top