Menu toggle

Problems With Early 2.5 Engines

Guest

New member
I have recently posted on the "I'm thinking of buying" tread, in response to a query regarding Boxster engines "˜blowing up'. As I would welcome any comment on this subject ASAP (see below for why) I have reposted hear to get a better "˜airing'.

Whilst engines blowing up are clearly not common, there does appear to be a few instances of this happening on the very early 2.5's, well catastrophic failures really rather blowing up.

As noted in my post, I know because I currently have one very sick example of an early 2.5 with a cylinder liner half an inch further into the cylinder than it should be, with the top of the piston ripped off and the fragments of which embedded into the cylinder head. All pretty terminal, with the re-build cost prohibitive, a replacement engine cost excessive, and a second hand engine probably the only realistic option.

I am lead to believe that this was a manufacturing fault, which was generally solved under warrantee as the problem typically showed up pretty quickly, and later engines were constructed differently to remove this potential liner slippage problem.

I accept that my problem is in a 6-year-old car with 72K miles (average?), but it has had a full Porsche service history, hence how many of you would consider this acceptable from a car manufacturer of such repute.

Having said all that, this is the first problem I have ever had with the car, and when running driving the car was always a pleasure "" who can't simile at that noise when that engine come "˜on-cam'. Assuming I sort my current one out, I would by another (an S this time) "" am I mad?

Three questions:

Does anyone know if the liner slippage is a "˜recognised' manufacturing fault, and can demonstrate it with anything in writing (magazine article, repair receipt, warrantee claim)?

Has any one ever had any assistance from Porsche with a car, out of warrantee with such a problem?

Anyone got a spare 2.5 engine?

Gary
 
Gary

One of the 'sages' from Porche Pete's board states that engines affected where built between September 98 and February 99.

At the moment Porsche do not acknowledge the RMS as being an issue so no they do not acknowledge slipped cylinder liners as a problem either.

Reported resonses from Porsche - 10% discount on labour, 500 pounds and go away.

IMHO It sucks!

Sorry no engines here, I'd bite the bullet and get a 3.4.

JCB..
 
My 1998 2.5 blew up at 13k mls and 2yrs 8mths old. Porsche replaced it FOC even though it was 8 mths out of warranty. I was lucky in that my OPC (Glenvarigill) fought my corner with gusto otherwise I think I was in for a £10k repair.
There was a lot of talk of failed 2.5 engines on Boxster Pete but it was a year earlier, i.e Sept98- Spring99, unless there were 2 problems.
Good luck,
 
John,

Thanks for the reply.

I had a quick look on Porsche Pete's board, and the general opinion on the amount of help Porsche provide seems consistant with what I am being offered.

Although I am not quite ready for the 3.4 option you suggest, I have located a low mileage 2.7 (not sure on exact age yet). So far I have only heard of liner slippage in 2.5's so I should be OK.

Does anyone have an experience of what might not make this a staightforward swap? I know to ECU will need re-mapping.

Thanks

Gary
 
If you do search on the Boxanet forum I seem to remember a Toolpants post from America about this issue
 
There's a Boxster S engine advertised on Ebay, £2500[8D]

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=10408&item=2480471473&rd=1
 
Thanks for the info Tony,

A 3.2 is very tempting, but the incompatibility with my remaining bits and pieces (gearbox, clutch etc etc) makes this a bit too adventurous for me at this time

Cary "" I had a search through Boxanet re Toolpants's past post you recalled could have answered my question re the potential problems of swapping a failed 2.5 for a 2.7 "" but couldn't find anything. I've tried emailing Toolpants direct, but no response as yet.

If anyone can remember such a post please let me know (my car has been immobile for 6 weeks of good UK weather "" which may constitute "˜the summer' for this year and will have missed it!!)

Gary
 

Posts made and opinions expressed are those of the individual forum members

Use of the Forum is subject to the Terms and Conditions

Disclaimer

The opinions expressed on this site are not necessarily those of the Club, who shall have no liability in respect of them or the accuracy of the content. The Club assumes no responsibility for any effects arising from errors or omissions.

Porsche Club Great Britain gives no warranties, guarantees or assurances and makes no representations or recommendations regarding any goods or services advertised on this site. It is the responsibility of visitors to satisfy themselves that goods and/or services supplied by any advertiser are bona fide and in no instance can the Porsche Club Great Britain be held responsible.

When responding to advertisements please ensure that you satisfy yourself of any applicable call charges on numbers not prefixed by usual "landline" STD Codes. Information can be obtained from the operator or the white pages. Before giving out ANY information regarding cars, or any other items for sale, please satisfy yourself that any potential purchaser is bona fide.

Directors of the Board of Porsche Club GB, Club Office Staff, Register Secretaries and Regional Organisers are often requested by Club members to provide information on matters connected with their cars and other matters referred to in the Club Rules. Such information, advice and assistance provided by such persons is given in good faith and is based on the personal experience and knowledge of the individual concerned.

Neither Porsche Club GB, nor any of the aforementioned, shall be under any liability in respect of any such information, advice or assistance given to members. Members are advised to consult qualified specialists for information, advice and assistance on matters connected with their cars at all times.

Back
Top