Just a quick update on the beast
Went to Parr today to put the beast on their dyno. I then spent some time with their race engineer who also does the dyno.
In terms of getting a real power figure I have been foiled - they couldn't get enough air into the beast - its an enclosed room with a fan but mine has 2 intakes, so one was not getting any air and the engineer indicated the other intake wasn't getting enough air. So he wasn't happy with the figures he got.
However we did get a proper torque figure (much lower revs) - peak is approx 430Nm at just over 3000 rpm. So 10nm up on the theoretical power kit value but at 1500 rpm lower. It pretty much stays above 400Nm (with some peaks and troughs) through to 7000 rpm.
The engineer was very impressed with this as a real in car measurement (torque did fall off a bit at higher rev's in line with the engine breathing problem). So given most quoted figures are before you put the engine in the car, where lots of losses kick in thats a fairly serious figure for a normally aspirated car (for a like for like with manufacturers figures, you need to allow for an approx 12.5% loss ie 488 NM, best guesstimate for adjusted power is around 409+ bhp).
However on looking further at the car - the engineer indicated that with the new set up the engine couldn't get enough air in to generate its proper potential. The exhaust and remap generate the high torque - with low back pressure it was pulling gasses through very efficiently - more efficiently than the car to get air in..........
The flashy carbon air intake box from the x51 kit seems to be the problem, which is highly ironic. It gets very hot and holds the heat too efficiently (the ambient temp in the box was higher than the engine bay) so the air going in gets hotter, expands and a) messes up the air flow, reducing air into the engine and b) the hot air expands is less dense and therefore the engine get less air, so a double whammy.
The engineer indicated they had had similar problems with their cup cars and in order to improve the breathing and power they resorted to a more direct link from intakes to engine. He drew for me what he thought would improve matters and the guy's then had a dig around to find something similar. It looks like the nearest (non home made) solution is the EVOMS air intake.
If this does what is intended its will reduce slightly the peak torque but also shrink the variation over the rev range and keep the torque higher towards the top end revs - this will also result in an increased power figure ie provide more consistency in torque and power curve (acceleration) across the range.
If anyone has any experience with an EVOMS intake please drop me a note with what you have found.
Will let you know how I ge ton with the EVOM's in the next week or so when it gets fitted.
Went to Parr today to put the beast on their dyno. I then spent some time with their race engineer who also does the dyno.
In terms of getting a real power figure I have been foiled - they couldn't get enough air into the beast - its an enclosed room with a fan but mine has 2 intakes, so one was not getting any air and the engineer indicated the other intake wasn't getting enough air. So he wasn't happy with the figures he got.
However we did get a proper torque figure (much lower revs) - peak is approx 430Nm at just over 3000 rpm. So 10nm up on the theoretical power kit value but at 1500 rpm lower. It pretty much stays above 400Nm (with some peaks and troughs) through to 7000 rpm.
The engineer was very impressed with this as a real in car measurement (torque did fall off a bit at higher rev's in line with the engine breathing problem). So given most quoted figures are before you put the engine in the car, where lots of losses kick in thats a fairly serious figure for a normally aspirated car (for a like for like with manufacturers figures, you need to allow for an approx 12.5% loss ie 488 NM, best guesstimate for adjusted power is around 409+ bhp).
However on looking further at the car - the engineer indicated that with the new set up the engine couldn't get enough air in to generate its proper potential. The exhaust and remap generate the high torque - with low back pressure it was pulling gasses through very efficiently - more efficiently than the car to get air in..........
The flashy carbon air intake box from the x51 kit seems to be the problem, which is highly ironic. It gets very hot and holds the heat too efficiently (the ambient temp in the box was higher than the engine bay) so the air going in gets hotter, expands and a) messes up the air flow, reducing air into the engine and b) the hot air expands is less dense and therefore the engine get less air, so a double whammy.
The engineer indicated they had had similar problems with their cup cars and in order to improve the breathing and power they resorted to a more direct link from intakes to engine. He drew for me what he thought would improve matters and the guy's then had a dig around to find something similar. It looks like the nearest (non home made) solution is the EVOMS air intake.
If this does what is intended its will reduce slightly the peak torque but also shrink the variation over the rev range and keep the torque higher towards the top end revs - this will also result in an increased power figure ie provide more consistency in torque and power curve (acceleration) across the range.
If anyone has any experience with an EVOMS intake please drop me a note with what you have found.
Will let you know how I ge ton with the EVOM's in the next week or so when it gets fitted.