Menu toggle

Top Gear Crew Expelled from Argentina

Surely it would be I982 FKL if meant to create offence ? or am I missing something ?

anyway how could anyone take offence at the most beautiful car of all time ?
 
Surely it would be I982 FKL if meant to create offence ? or am I missing something ?

It's what happens when the most deliberately provocative team on TV set out to cause offence, and meet the people with a chip on their shoulders looking for a fight....

Might change my mind watching tomorrow's finale, but it seems a pretty naive episode, with an obvious mistake in taking any UK plate even if they didn't see the interpretation.

"Where the Belgrano sailed from, and where feelings are still high"? 982 and any combination of FKL is goig to be seen as provocative, isn't it? [8|]

Joke that went wrong IMO.
 
Yes tomorrow night .. I hate the way they treat that 928; they should be chased out of the country just for that ! ;never mind the number plate
 
At a recent Porsche motor sport evening I asked the guy who actually supplied the car to JC and Top Gear if the number plate was really a coincidence - he assured me it was
But the he would say at wouldn't he ? Or perhaps not ? [8|][8|]
 
I don't think it matters if the plate was a stupid attempt at humour, or a mistake: if you are going to drive British-registered cars to Argentina, with a team renowned for deliberate provocation and insensitivity, you'd check for anything that could be mis-read, wouldn't you?

I just think they forget sometimes just how deep feelings can run. It was hairy at times in the US episode, but you'd have thought they'd have seen that coming as well.

 
It's been said before, but the moral is:

DON'T LEND TOP GEAR A CAR.

You may be seduced into the desire to see 'your prize possession' on TV, you may believe that they will take good care of it. You may be happy with a tank full of petrol for your trouble.

But you may be sorry.
 
Really sad to see that last episode.

Fair enough if you want to play idiots around the world, but putting the crew at risk is unfair.

Why try to send the "escape" convoy out with the "star cars"? Abandoning them, and going undercover, would make sense, but taking them with the crew was either asking for trouble, or part of a cynical plot to make some good TV.

Seemed like an attempt to make a sensational programme that went wrong. Thank God no-one was seriously hurt, and perhaps it's time to stop sticking the BBC nose in to a hornet's nest in order to make exploitative TV? [&o]
 
Yes I agree. This is not a motoring show, it is a comedy.

The trio would like you to believe that they are just 3 against the elements, but the truth is they have vast support, tens of crew, helicopters, repairs wagons etc etc. It is a total nonsense.

But we still watch it [:D]
 
Ignoring the politics, why have we come to a so called car programme taking three perfectly good classic cars and deliberately wrecking them, and it is supposed to be entertainment? What next ... an Arena Art Special where they burn priceless Turner watercolours for a lark? Same thing really.

A friend of mine has just reminded me of that ghastly Noel Edmonds show, where someone innocent got killed in a silly prank that went wrong. Top Gear is flirting with true disaster.

Can it ... now!
 
What a waste of a rare 928 S4 GT ,Mach 1 and Lotus ,Never see these cars on uk roads much. right cars and number plates wrong place.
 
If JC is really brave then he should drive down the Falls Road in Belfast on July 12th with a Union Jack Car. I agree it pains me too to see good cars thrashed like this. Top Gear has become like a circus where you laugh at the pain of the clowns .
 

ORIGINAL: N.Alam

What a waste of a rare 928 S4 GT ,Mach 1 and Lotus ,Never see these cars on uk roads much. right cars and number plates wrong place.

100% my thoughts, all 3 rare and very desirable cars in their own right, in fact perhaps the most desirable versions of each type in many ways. So for 'entertainment' they decide to trash them in utterly meaningless and childish prating about in a foreign country. They could quite easily have done that drive and done practically no damage to the cars but that is not 'entertaining' enough for them. They are the opposite of petrolheads.

I didn't watch the last series btw in case anyone asks but couldn't help but have it on in the background this evening to see what all the fuss was about. The scenery was nice though just a shame about the other 90% of the program.
 
Of course venting our spleen here will do little good, especially as we all watch the program with ever increasing incredulity.

What we need to do is just the opposite, together with other clubs and Pistonheads, all decide NOT to watch it.
 
After the North Pole and 4X4 specials all the Christmas shows have been pretty stupid to the point of tedium. Same jokes, same contrived scenarios. India was probably the worst by way of stupidity (of scenarios) but this came close. I can appreciate that watching cars drive along endless miles of smooth tarmac would be boring but "The road just ran out so we had to drive through a forest..." Really? "We had to land on the beach.." Cobblers!

The number plate incident does seem to be too much of a coincidence not to have been contrived but, either way, the resulting mob violence was apauling.
 
There is an interesting point buried in there John. Portillo seems to be hosting another rather enjoyable series where he just goes places on a train, I understand what those three are all about but someone could have made an epic driving adventure documentary through Patagonia instead we got yet more banal car crash television (literally).
 
They did put a call out for a Rubystone 964RS, which was answered by a certain dealer in Yorshire, to date never seen anything since. Maybe JC was too blown away to admit he liked a 911[:D]
 

Posts made and opinions expressed are those of the individual forum members

Use of the Forum is subject to the Terms and Conditions

Disclaimer

The opinions expressed on this site are not necessarily those of the Club, who shall have no liability in respect of them or the accuracy of the content. The Club assumes no responsibility for any effects arising from errors or omissions.

Porsche Club Great Britain gives no warranties, guarantees or assurances and makes no representations or recommendations regarding any goods or services advertised on this site. It is the responsibility of visitors to satisfy themselves that goods and/or services supplied by any advertiser are bona fide and in no instance can the Porsche Club Great Britain be held responsible.

When responding to advertisements please ensure that you satisfy yourself of any applicable call charges on numbers not prefixed by usual "landline" STD Codes. Information can be obtained from the operator or the white pages. Before giving out ANY information regarding cars, or any other items for sale, please satisfy yourself that any potential purchaser is bona fide.

Directors of the Board of Porsche Club GB, Club Office Staff, Register Secretaries and Regional Organisers are often requested by Club members to provide information on matters connected with their cars and other matters referred to in the Club Rules. Such information, advice and assistance provided by such persons is given in good faith and is based on the personal experience and knowledge of the individual concerned.

Neither Porsche Club GB, nor any of the aforementioned, shall be under any liability in respect of any such information, advice or assistance given to members. Members are advised to consult qualified specialists for information, advice and assistance on matters connected with their cars at all times.

Back
Top