BTW France and Germany are busy investing now in wind generation...
What a waste of time, effort and money.
It takes at least a
constant wind speed of 8m/sec to make them viable in any way shape or form. This can only be found north of Scotland and miles out to sea so for Gordon Brown and the gormless hapless believers of Saint Gore to keep building them where they are is a waste of money that could be used in researching the use of alternatives like coal (of which we have a couple of hundred years supply) or building Nuclear.
It is ENERGY that is the key issue today for who will care about global warming when the power runs out!
Good point about Nuclear...the French have invested long term in non fossil fuel generation. Result: a secure supply and lower energy prices. And not only do we buy electricity from them, we'll have to buy the generation technology from them too, I gather. BTW France and Germany are busy investing now in wind generation...every little helps, and the politicians' hope of just one grand solution is a simpleton's view.
You'd think at least one politician might have asked "what do we do when the gas runs out?"
To quote (badly) the UK`s leading authority on energy......................
"The govt is due to close 15 coal powered stations in the next few years so as to attempt to meet the UK`s agreed emissions targets yet there are no plans to replace them. For each Megawatt of wind power generated we need to build a power station that also is capable of generating that Megawatt for what happens to us when the wind doesnt blow! "
What we need is a politician with b*lls who is happy to stand up and declare this global warming scaremongering for what it is. All they do is go along with the huge industry that has sprung up, driven mainly by civil servants who are very choosy about who they listen to.
The arctic ice cores tell a different tale completely as does the fact that the worlds biggest ever industrial expansion and Co2 output (during and after the 2nd world war right throught to the massive industrial boom of the 50`s and 60`s) actually saw global temperatures drop over that period!
The earth has been warmer, the ice caps smaller but the ONLY correlation accurately made with regard to global temperatures is the suns activity which for the last 20 - 30 years has been particularly active.
Ironically its activity has just dramatically ceased so watch this space for global cooling.
PS: The suns activity was particularly low during and after the 2nd world war [
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c4fb/1c4fb4a004ac374ae735c210f8560be0dce354ac" alt="Wink ;) ;)"
]
**************************
S`wat I believe and I wont listen to any other argument (just like the global warming band wagon)