Menu toggle

wot no tread

DaveyB

New member
I fitted P zeros to my car last year. And they are down to the wear marks. That is less than 9k.

I short while ago there was a thread about tyre tread not being that deep, and I am sure that is why these Rossos have worn out so quickly.

Can you mix front to back tyre types? I fitted P zeros on the back as they are fitted on the front. But I was thinking of fitting something that lasted slightly longer. I don't think I drive particularly hard, so is 9k what you should expect from these tyres?

What tyres last the longest, and grip the best?













 
i only just managed 4k miles out of a pair of contis on the rear of my c4 ! as for mixing brands ,well my experience says not on a c4.

75pno
 
I think 9 thousand is quite good for the rears of a 911. I only get about 11 thousand on the back of the 944 turbo. New tyre tread depth is what it is. When I bought my 996tt it had Pzeros on the rear and Bridgestones on the front. I finished those off at the Bedofrd track day in May with the 944 register. It now has Bridgstones on the rear. Interstingly I kept getting pasm cutting in on even easy bends when first fiitted but now after a couple of hundred miles it seems to have settled down. If you have more tread that would probably exacerbate the problem with pasm cutting in, and because the tread block move around more, the extra half a mm or so might quite easily not give pro rata wear rates
 
I used to get 12000 from the rears and 24000 from the fronts, with P-Zero Rossos on my C2. About the same for Michelin Pilot Sports, but I found them quieter and better in the wet, albeit they were the most expensive. I had a similar experience to Paul with my Turbo, and only got 4000 from each of two pairs of Contis on the rear. Other people were experiencing the same thing at athe time, and although there should be no difference in compound, new Contis seem to be a lot better. I eventually went to Yokohama Advan Sport V103s on the Turbo (non-N) and they were brilliant. Much better wearing than anything else I had had before, and I reckon they would have lasted 15-16000 had I kept the car.

If you haven't had it checked recently, get a full alignment done when you get the new ones fitted. Personally, I wouldn't mix front and rears, but there is nothing legally wrong with it.
 
14k & counting on my 996 4S [:D] & still have 5mm + but I do expect them to start dropping off quickly now

obviously not driving hard enough [;)]

Conti Contact Sport N2
 

Dave,

I too only got about 9k miles out of the P-Zero rears on my Cayman (they were down to 2-3mm); that was in general use and before I did a track day. The fronts are still holding up well though.

Personally, I wouldn't mix front and rears which means that I'm hoping that by the time the rears are worn this time round, the fronts will also be due for replacement and I can perhaps choose a different tyre manufacturer.

Jeff
 
Is it really that critical to keep same tyre front and rear?

Surely new tyres at one end and part worn at other will feel different from fully worn part worn so if you replace a"bald" pair tyres by a new pair of tyres you will always get different handling characteristics irrespective of what brand you put on so does it really matter which brand as long as it is a pair of similar quality?

Yes in a perfect world replace all 4 but all 4 wearing out at same time is a rare occurrance

 
Another vote for not mixing tyres here.

We always had a policy at work for never mixing tyres (blue light service) and one could argue a 'spiritually' driven Porsche would be making similar momentum.......
 
Lots of people saying don't mix tyre brands, nobody actually as yet given a reason why?? It's always nice to have an explanation. The tyre manufacturers will obviously say don't do it, to sell more tyres and cover their arses. Personally having different manufacturer on the front to back, I don't think is a problem. (done it for years, bikes and cars) Also a lot of differently branded/marketed tyres are made by the same manufacuturer. One example being Pirelli/Metzeler.

 

ORIGINAL: middy

Lots of people saying don't mix tyre brands, nobody actually as yet given a reason why?? It's always nice to have an explanation. The tyre manufacturers will obviously say don't do it, to sell more tyres and cover their arses. Personally having different manufacturer on the front to back, I don't think is a problem. (done it for years, bikes and cars) Also a lot of differently branded/marketed tyres are made by the same manufacuturer. One example being Pirelli/Metzeler.

It's really not such a big deal unless you're tracking the car where the performance difference front to back will lead to unexpected understeer/oversteer. You can't get an extended warranty if you mix either.
 

ORIGINAL: middy

Lots of people saying don't mix tyre brands, nobody actually as yet given a reason why?? It's always nice to have an explanation. The tyre manufacturers will obviously say don't do it, to sell more tyres and cover their arses. Personally having different manufacturer on the front to back, I don't think is a problem. (done it for years, bikes and cars) Also a lot of differently branded/marketed tyres are made by the same manufacuturer. One example being Pirelli/Metzeler.
The reason for not mixing tyres is that different tyres act differently to each other, by putting different compounds on the front and rear you could ultimately cause damage to the drivetrain as the fronts may have more/less grip than the rears, or visor versa.

This would be more damaging in a 4 wheel drive car than a 2 wheel drive car, but even with a 2 wheel drive car the grip element will always be there if using different makes/N ratings on the front and rears.

 
It's about differing tread patterns which can behave differently in the wet, differing compounds and wear rates which can mean differing levels of grip. Ultimately it is the individuals choice, I have been involved in accident investigations in the past where mixed tyres was cited as a contributor to the chain of events.

Your money, your risk and your call.

ORIGINAL: pje1210


ORIGINAL: middy

Lots of people saying don't mix tyre brands, nobody actually as yet given a reason why?? It's always nice to have an explanation. The tyre manufacturers will obviously say don't do it, to sell more tyres and cover their arses. Personally having different manufacturer on the front to back, I don't think is a problem. (done it for years, bikes and cars) Also a lot of differently branded/marketed tyres are made by the same manufacuturer. One example being Pirelli/Metzeler.
The reason for not mixing tyres is that different tyres act differently to each other, by putting different compounds on the front and rear you could ultimately cause damage to the drivetrain as the fronts may have more/less grip than the rears, or visor versa.

This would be more damaging in a 4 wheel drive car than a 2 wheel drive car, but even with a 2 wheel drive car the grip element will always be there if using different makes/N ratings on the front and rears.
 
As I said, I don't like mixing brands front and rear, but I'd like to play the Devil's advocate a little.

If Porsche issue N ratings to tyres, it is to ensure a certain level of performance in wet and dry conditions. Presumably that standard level is the same for all N rated tyres for that model. If that is correct, then there should be no huge difference if you fit N rated tyres of different makes on front and rear.

We aren't talking about fitting Michelins on the front, and DingDong Superbudgets on the rear of a Bugatti Veyron.
 
Well, still no valid reason. You will often use a different compound and tread pattern front to rear. In drying conditions for instance, quite common to put full wet up front(very soft compound, one tread pattern) (intermidate or dry on rear, another tread pattern) Obviously you would'nt use a different rating front to rear, it's n rated all round but that does'nt mean you can't use 2 different manufacturers of n rated tyre. Does it?
 
Not really comparing like for like if you are suggesting track practices are transferable to the road. Get it wrong, you have an off and get some gravel/grass rash or mild panel damage - on the road....?

Personal choice at the end of the day - on the road I would never mix tyres.

ORIGINAL: middy

Well, still no valid reason. You will often use a different compound and tread pattern front to rear. In drying conditions for instance, quite common to put full wet up front(very soft compound, one tread pattern) (intermidate or dry on rear, another tread pattern) Obviously you would'nt use a different rating front to rear, it's n rated all round but that does'nt mean you can't use 2 different manufacturers of n rated tyre. Does it?
 
Well, if 9k isn't bad I'll stick to the P zeros. I think the car wouldn't look right with different tyres back and front.

And it does look good with Rosso on each tyre ;-), even when I'm driving it.
 
A track is just a private road with different laws, it makes no difference to how a vehicle behaves or reacts to different tyre manufacturers.
 
ORIGINAL: middy

A track is just a private road with different laws, it makes no difference to how a vehicle behaves or reacts to different tyre manufacturers.

You're much more likely to be at the limit on a track and therefore more likely to fully realise the capabilities of the tyres. Any difference will make itself much more apparent. Pootling about at road legal speeds won't really let you know how your tyres handle which makes mixing brands less significant
 

Posts made and opinions expressed are those of the individual forum members

Use of the Forum is subject to the Terms and Conditions

Disclaimer

The opinions expressed on this site are not necessarily those of the Club, who shall have no liability in respect of them or the accuracy of the content. The Club assumes no responsibility for any effects arising from errors or omissions.

Porsche Club Great Britain gives no warranties, guarantees or assurances and makes no representations or recommendations regarding any goods or services advertised on this site. It is the responsibility of visitors to satisfy themselves that goods and/or services supplied by any advertiser are bona fide and in no instance can the Porsche Club Great Britain be held responsible.

When responding to advertisements please ensure that you satisfy yourself of any applicable call charges on numbers not prefixed by usual "landline" STD Codes. Information can be obtained from the operator or the white pages. Before giving out ANY information regarding cars, or any other items for sale, please satisfy yourself that any potential purchaser is bona fide.

Directors of the Board of Porsche Club GB, Club Office Staff, Register Secretaries and Regional Organisers are often requested by Club members to provide information on matters connected with their cars and other matters referred to in the Club Rules. Such information, advice and assistance provided by such persons is given in good faith and is based on the personal experience and knowledge of the individual concerned.

Neither Porsche Club GB, nor any of the aforementioned, shall be under any liability in respect of any such information, advice or assistance given to members. Members are advised to consult qualified specialists for information, advice and assistance on matters connected with their cars at all times.

Back
Top