pauljmcnulty
Active member
ORIGINAL: Neil Haughey
ORIGINAL: Big Dave UK
Neil
I didnt say they dont rust, they just dont seem as prone to it as the 944,s...
Certainly not aimed at you Dave. ISTR several years ago the same was said about the 944 S2 and turbo. Basically just seems to be age related, I expect to see many 968's with rusty cills in the coming years. The cill and bottom of the rear quarter rusts from the inside out on series 2 944 shells, the 968 seems to be the same and I can't really see any reason why it wouldn't. The one good thing though is that all that plastic on the 968 does stop the bottom of all the arches getting stone chipped to death and rusting through. I don't really understand why they didn't just make the drain hole at the end of the cill much bigger and or point it down rather then back, or better still have a series of drain holes in the bottom of the cill. IMHO the problem is caused by dampness in that area not escaping, mine was actually full of dirt, it took me about 2 hours to clean out both sides, was a bit of a PITA really but has to be done.
Something else I forgot to say earlier, do you like elephant ears or aero mirrors? I love the aero or cup mirrors as some call them. I know many ppl will not like to admit to it but a lot of the 968 vs 944 thing does come down to looks.
2 things. Firstly the mirrors, if I change the car I won't be swapping the mirrors. Driving Peter Empson's 944S was a revelation to me, the field of vision from the flag mirrors is just in another league. To be fair, I'm a van driver during the day so I'm both reliant on and used to big side mirrors, but this a one case where I'm going to put real-life practicality over looks. Much the same as I do with the old beer-versus-belly dilemma we 40-somethings have to think about. [&o]
Rusty sills? Of course the 968 will corrode in the same areas as the 944 as they share the same design. Of course 968s aren't yet as rusty as 944s because they are younger, but only by a couple of years in the case we're talking about here, the S2 over the 968 as opposed to buying a turbo.
Every Porsche approaching 20 years old will need serious consideration given to it's bodywork. Did anyone read the article on the 928 with masses of structural rot last month? If you don't want to worry about rust buy a new car and lose £000s each year in depreciation. These cars will cost a lot to keep on the road over the coming years, but even the worst case restoration of a 944/968 will result in a better car than the Mondeo that will cost the same in real terms over, say, ten years?
I'd suggest that the skirts on a 968 might be hiding the blistering sills that is often the first sign of rot in a 944. That just means popping the vent and having a look, and that access helps to easily protect the sills. One thing to think about is that the design of all those vents airs the sills if the car is regularly driven. Garage queens might be liable to suffer worse corrosion if damp is trapped for weeks on end in a warm environment. As I said, buying the best car is far more sensible than getting hung up on whether you prefer the look of the headlights on a 968 or an S2.