Now compare the above with a 964 RS shock. You will notice the piston is much smaller in diameter and also note the end cap design. Notice the way the shock body dimples inwards, i would guess it would be impossible to remove the piston from the body due to the deformation of the shock body hence the reason they cant rebuild them!! The cup single tube design is stronger by virtue of the bigger diameter piston and therefore more suitable for racing ! The struct insert can be removed completely from the body of the shock making them easily rebuildable. Both Front designs are green coloured !!!
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Bilstein Part Numbers anyone?
- Thread starter RSGulp
- Start date
Whilst searching for better pictures to illustrate, i found this thread which covers this off perfectly. Proving it's all been said before[]
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/porsche-964-993-technical-forum/522584-964rs-vs-964-rsr-shocks-discuss.html there is a great pic of the crimping i was talking about.
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/porsche-964-993-technical-forum/522584-964rs-vs-964-rsr-shocks-discuss.html there is a great pic of the crimping i was talking about.
Hacki
Active member
Thanx for sharing, Laurence, well done. I was thinking how to point out that the Cup front shocks are really different from the RS shocks - now you´ve done the job.
It would be interesting to know, how many miles of use the shocks can stand before a refurb is necessary. (Use in anger that is)
I have 41,000 km on my Cup car now and a refurb seems to be due now, maybe due for a while, I just got used to it. The Cups always had a way too high rebound rate, which causes trouble as soon as the surface is not billiard table smooth. So, also for a Cup, which is not used for trackdays and similar events only, an alternative makes sense. As Charles said, they are a nightmare on the road.
Ref. RS - for sure there are a lot of RS drivers out there with experience e. g. with the WR kit by Bilstein or KW or whatsoever - I guess (no personal experience) that the WR kit could be great for a car, that is used on the roads also.
Rgds,
Hacki
It would be interesting to know, how many miles of use the shocks can stand before a refurb is necessary. (Use in anger that is)
I have 41,000 km on my Cup car now and a refurb seems to be due now, maybe due for a while, I just got used to it. The Cups always had a way too high rebound rate, which causes trouble as soon as the surface is not billiard table smooth. So, also for a Cup, which is not used for trackdays and similar events only, an alternative makes sense. As Charles said, they are a nightmare on the road.
Ref. RS - for sure there are a lot of RS drivers out there with experience e. g. with the WR kit by Bilstein or KW or whatsoever - I guess (no personal experience) that the WR kit could be great for a car, that is used on the roads also.
Rgds,
Hacki
Just my own opinion and others will likely disagree on this. Shock aborbers(dampers) either work or they dont! Failure mode being they no longer provide damping action or they leak. The age old one bonce rule being crude but relevant. Of course there is a whole world in between working and failed, you could class as out of tolerance or worn. You can get your shocks tested but it's not an easy or cheap thing to do. They could then fail the next day!
I would love to see a test back to back with "worn" against "new" with real world drivers. I wonder if they could tell?
I would love to see a test back to back with "worn" against "new" with real world drivers. I wonder if they could tell?
Hacki
Active member
ORIGINAL: Laurence Gibbs
I would love to see a test back to back with "worn" against "new" with real world drivers. I wonder if they could tell?
I know from the 997 Cup car that the professional drivers can feel the difference between worn and new very well.
Thats why i said real world drivers. A pro spends thousands of hours developing that level of feel.
Posts made and opinions expressed are those of the individual forum members
Use of the Forum is subject to the Terms and Conditions
Disclaimer
The opinions expressed on this site are not necessarily those of the Club, who shall have no liability in respect of them or the accuracy of the content. The Club assumes no responsibility for any effects arising from errors or omissions.
Porsche Club Great Britain gives no warranties, guarantees or assurances and makes no representations or recommendations regarding any goods or services advertised on this site. It is the responsibility of visitors to satisfy themselves that goods and/or services supplied by any advertiser are bona fide and in no instance can the Porsche Club Great Britain be held responsible.
When responding to advertisements please ensure that you satisfy yourself of any applicable call charges on numbers not prefixed by usual "landline" STD Codes. Information can be obtained from the operator or the white pages. Before giving out ANY information regarding cars, or any other items for sale, please satisfy yourself that any potential purchaser is bona fide.
Directors of the Board of Porsche Club GB, Club Office Staff, Register Secretaries and Regional Organisers are often requested by Club members to provide information on matters connected with their cars and other matters referred to in the Club Rules. Such information, advice and assistance provided by such persons is given in good faith and is based on the personal experience and knowledge of the individual concerned.
Neither Porsche Club GB, nor any of the aforementioned, shall be under any liability in respect of any such information, advice or assistance given to members. Members are advised to consult qualified specialists for information, advice and assistance on matters connected with their cars at all times.