Menu toggle

Boxster 3.4 UK Summer 06

What I have heard from OPC is that MY2007 (i.e. last quarter 2006) Boxster S will have Cayman's 3.4, while base MY2007 Boxster will have a 2.8, with the same engine being used for a base Cayman probably to be launched earlier 2007 following the revised Boxsters.

Was told this information following a Cayman S test drive when I enquired about a possible base model, silly really as they possibly lost a sale for a new Boxster, think I'll hang on for a bit!

During the build up to Cayman launch I seem to remember Porsche saying something along the lines that the would not "de-tune" the same engine to put in another model.
 
ORIGINAL: tiskev

No I cant believe it is so low.
My Slick 32 AMG has I think 345BHP and is only 3199cc.
Is a V6 so much better than a flat 6.

Isn't the AMG 3.2 supercharged (Kompressor)?
 
As far as asking the OPC for info about new models, you'd be better off asking the woman behind the fish couner at Sainsbury's. I've asked them at various points in the past about the 3.4 in a Boxster and the timings behind various 997 evolutions and been given the fob off "we are definitely not aware of those models" , despite the very cars appearing as spy shots in the pages of the mags lying around in their showrooms. Having worked in the automotive industry I know about the advanced product planning that goes on, and how well advised the dealer networks should be, so not extending a degree of common courtesy and respect for a market knowledge of an established customer is a disgrace.
 
ORIGINAL: Dapster

As far as asking the OPC for info about new models, you'd be better off asking the woman behind the fish couner at Sainsbury's.

Dappula you have just revealed my number one source [:eek:] No damage done you didn't mention which branch :ROFLMAO:
 
ORIGINAL: tiskev
Is a V6 so much better than a flat 6.

Here's one reason why it ain't [8D]

One benefit of using a boxer engine versus a V engine is that the design provides good balance because each piston's momentum is exactly counterbalanced by the corresponding piston movement of the opposite side. These engines can run very smoothly and free of vibrations with a four stroke cycle, regardless of number of cylinders, and do not require a balance shaft or counterweights on the crankshaft to balance the weight of the reciprocating parts which are required in other engine configurations.

And one for..

Boxer engines tend to produce more noise than inline and V-engines because valve clatter is not so well dampened due to lack of covering by air-filters and other components, and produce a larger torsional vibration than a V engine, and so tend to require a larger flywheel.

JCB..
 
Thanks John
Now I know why they seem to rattle.
I wonder why they dont make a flat 8/10/12 if they are that good.
I would like a 911 but cant stand that noise behind your head on long journeys.
I found it so bad in my last Boxster that I even started taking my wife out to drown it a bit.
 
ORIGINAL: tiskev

Yes and limited to 155mph re chipped not much off 200.

Re-chipped to do near 200mph is fine but what about the engine, cooling, tyres, brakes, dampers, gearbox, etc that weren't engineered to go more than 155mph [&o]
 
ORIGINAL: tiskev
I wonder why they dont make a flat 8/10/12 if they are that good.

It's the fact that a V configuration engine is more compact than the equivalent Boxer engine.

A Merc needs the extra space for the portable hairdressing kit! [:D]
 
I would not have it rechipped but I am sure the setup would take extra speed asAMG
would do the rechipping themselves.
 
Just have a look under the bonnet on the AMG john no room for a dryer
but it sure is pretty to look at.The only time you see your motor is when youre having the
RMS replaced[;)][;)]
 
I had a test drive in a Cayman S and also a Boxster 987 S today. For some reason I felt decidedly underwhelmed by the Cayman experience. IMHO the hype in the media has been excessive.

For example, the Cayman is supposed to be 100% more rigid [?] - but this meant nothing and was not apparent when I drove it. Certainly the Cayman is much faster and more responsive than my existing car, but I found the Boxster S to be a more relaxing car to drive, and even more responsive than the Cayman. I hasten to add that both test cars had 5,000 miles + on their mileometers, so I think that I was comparing like with like.

It may well be that familiarity with my Boxster has affected my expectations and driving expereince, but, if I were to change cars, i would go for the Boxster S with some 'extras'.

Of course, if my Lottery tickets came up trumps then a 911 S would eb a distinct possibility...
 
ORIGINAL: juliany27

I had a test drive in a Cayman S and also a Boxster 987 S today. For some reason I felt decidedly underwhelmed by the Cayman experience. IMHO the hype in the media has been excessive.

I found the Boxster S to be a more relaxing car to drive, and even more responsive than the Cayman. I hasten to add that both test cars had 5,000 miles + on their mileometers, so I think that I was comparing like with like.

Julian I can pretty much second your comments but would add it maybe a different story if I was driving the Cayman and then my 987 S on the very limits (My limits not the cars of course [:D]) But in the real world and in the fashion I drive they are very samey to me except when I drop the top then the 987 is the only choice [8D]
 
I also have heard next MY Boxster S will have the 3.4 Cayman engine. Cant be sure though if exactly same HP (if size restrictions on inlet manifold).

Cant wait.

Nic, learning to sail in Sydney where it has rained for days!
 

Posts made and opinions expressed are those of the individual forum members

Use of the Forum is subject to the Terms and Conditions

Disclaimer

The opinions expressed on this site are not necessarily those of the Club, who shall have no liability in respect of them or the accuracy of the content. The Club assumes no responsibility for any effects arising from errors or omissions.

Porsche Club Great Britain gives no warranties, guarantees or assurances and makes no representations or recommendations regarding any goods or services advertised on this site. It is the responsibility of visitors to satisfy themselves that goods and/or services supplied by any advertiser are bona fide and in no instance can the Porsche Club Great Britain be held responsible.

When responding to advertisements please ensure that you satisfy yourself of any applicable call charges on numbers not prefixed by usual "landline" STD Codes. Information can be obtained from the operator or the white pages. Before giving out ANY information regarding cars, or any other items for sale, please satisfy yourself that any potential purchaser is bona fide.

Directors of the Board of Porsche Club GB, Club Office Staff, Register Secretaries and Regional Organisers are often requested by Club members to provide information on matters connected with their cars and other matters referred to in the Club Rules. Such information, advice and assistance provided by such persons is given in good faith and is based on the personal experience and knowledge of the individual concerned.

Neither Porsche Club GB, nor any of the aforementioned, shall be under any liability in respect of any such information, advice or assistance given to members. Members are advised to consult qualified specialists for information, advice and assistance on matters connected with their cars at all times.

Back
Top