Older people need more than a eye test, there should be a basic driving skills assessment at 70 imo as most are not fit to drive.Motorhead said:That would be a very good solution Andrew - and I take on board the (potential) advantages of having the brake lights on when the car is stationary.
However, I have to say that if you're unable to recognise that the car in front is stationary then you need to get your eyes tested and you're not fit to drive..! Although at long last I note that the government are contemplating making a regular eye test compulsory for older drivers, I believe that this rule should be compulsory for all drivers, regardless of age.
Many cars nowadays have the option of some sort of low speed collision avoidance system being fitted and it won't be long before that and adaptive autonomous cruise control become standard fitments, so the pesky brake light problem will become a moot point.
Jeff
as for a hand brake, my golf does every thing perfectly with how it works, so I never need to press any buttons, I always leave cars in gear, stops them being towed away or rolling off. But the hold function on my Golf is perfect, I wish my porkers had the same system. The GT4 and Spyder system are very flawed in daily use. My GT3 I don’t notice as it’s more a hoon car. But Golf wins again, it really is the perfect car.