Menu toggle

Dyno Day 2

Crossover, sports pre-silencer and back box.

See attached photos


B58C52BC1FD14181A8413D9CD944C4F8.jpg
 
The max. torque figure is very slightly up and occurs further up the power band now. There is a small flat spot (dip in both bhp and torque curves) around 4000 rpm against the original figures, but I have emailed my charts to Steve Wong and he is confident that he can smooth these out when he re-maps the AFR with the custom chip.

In the "backside" dyno the car really pulls strong now and above 5000rpm the torque keeps going whereas before it dropped away quite a bit. The chart reflects this as well.

Steve
 
Those are some great curves guys - for essentially std engines. The peak torque on 911MOT's curve is one of the highest I have seen. Higher than mine on my last 260hp run, though the Supercup cams make a much flatter torque curve so the area under it is still larger. Its interesting that the peak power on all the posted graphs seems to be a little higher than the last set of 3.2 graphs posted - more like 5900-6000rpm. Some of the other 3.2s show peak power as low as 5300rpm. I wonder if the cam timing is a little different from engine to engine? Anyone know what the factory peak power rpms are? I think getting the cam timing on my car right made a lot of the difference, so anyone who seems to be down on power after a dyno pull should get the cam timing checked at their next service (if they care!). The chains do stretch and the sprockets will wear over time.

I think its fantastic that an exhaust and custom chip can get you close to 250hp on an internally standard 3.2. Great job guys.

RB

PS - I will be sure to let you know when I hit 270hp !
 
Steve,

Thanks for sorting out Sunday - an enjoyable afternoon.

My V2 chip wasn't as good as the V1, and SW reckons I should run with that as it is as good as I will get without constant tweeking.

Your graphs are the same 'shape' as mine, so I guess that SW Chip will see both lines 'lifted' up a couple of squares on the graph. See my attached run of the 256bhp and 240ft/lbs torque. Given you are starting from ~5bhp more with your exhaust, it will be interesting to see if the chip makes 260bhp for you !
 
ORIGINAL: Richard Bernau

Those are some great curves guys - for essentially std engines. The peak torque on 911MOT's curve is one of the highest I have seen. Higher than mine on my last 260hp run, though the Supercup cams make a much flatter torque curve so the area under it is still larger.
PS - I will be sure to let you know when I hit 270hp !
Hi Richard,

SW was dissappointed with my V2 chip, but now believes he is getting a handle on the Weltmeister readings in general, and feels the AFR may be reading a little differently to the 'real' numbers on Lambda. Although my V2 chip made the same 256bhp, it was down on bhp and torque right until it peaked at ~6000rpm - i.e. he raised the power there but killed it low down. He has told me to stick with V1, as 256bhp and 240ft/lbs are great numbers - it is the torque number I am most pleased with really.

The 911 book by Paul Frere shows peak power at ~5,750rpm.
 
Hi Richard - I think the original peak power of 231bhp was quoted at 5900 rpm. My original chart made peak bhp at 5600 now it's spot on 5900.

Max torque should be at 4800, mine is now at 5000.

Steve
 
Ian - Ordered my SW chip yesterday, should be here in a couple of weeks I guess. I'll fit it and re-dyno straight away. I'll update the thread to keep everybody up to speed.

Steve
 
Twinny,
Thanks for organising Sunday, My SW chip not available yet, but should be in place by the next Dyno day,
If I hadn't seen it with my own eyes I would never believe you would have got such a big rise in BHP by bolting on a bake bean can as an exhaust system[;)], well done a great purchase.
Adrian, great figures for your car as well, some people are certainly raising the bar now. The SW chips are proving there worth as well.
 
Steve - Do I detect a faint hint or sour grapes here?

I think Ian at Hayward & Scott would consider that quite a lot of time and money has gone into research before actually selecting which brand of baked beans and therefore by definition, which tin is best suited to the job.

I'm told the real skill though comes in steaming off the label first so they don't leave any tell-tale glue behind which could be analysed thus identifying the tin's source (or should that be sauce!)

Steve
 
Just teasing Twinny,
I am in fact very impressed with your Hayward & Scott system, its produced more than twice the BHP improvement I would have expected, also it sounded brilliant. I was hoping my half Zymol
polished bonnet might have produced and extra HP or 2 [:(](in house joke for others on the forum wondering what I am on about)
 
Hi Steve, as a matter of interest how much roughly did the system cost, in particular the cross over and pre silencer pieces - when I purchased mine it came with a 80mm SS twin outlet backbox the make of which is still a mystery, so it might be worth me updating those other exhaust elements

Cheers
 
Steve, I know I know!.... maybe you and I can get Weltmeisters to do a quick dyno session for us when our SW chips are in. Steve was programming mine last night and thought that it should only take about 10 days to deliver.

I thought that Zymol wax should have made you an extra 2bhp plus tea and cakes whilst we were waiting it's that good!

Let me know.

Steve
 
ORIGINAL: highfield

- it is the torque number I am most pleased with really.

Yes, that torque number is the best I have seen for any 3.2. It's much higher than my peak, though you can see that mine goes flat from about 4700rpm all the way to 6200rpm, and its only by 6600rpm that it really drops off the map. You are also above 200FtLbs all the way from 2700rpm on. The cams seem to be giving 300-400rpm of extra power and torque. Doesn't sound like much when I put it like that and think what I paid [:)] I don't think even SW's next chip will find the better part of 20FtLbs it is lagging behind yours though.

I am still staggered at the output of your car [:D]

IMG_0337.jpg
 

Posts made and opinions expressed are those of the individual forum members

Use of the Forum is subject to the Terms and Conditions

Disclaimer

The opinions expressed on this site are not necessarily those of the Club, who shall have no liability in respect of them or the accuracy of the content. The Club assumes no responsibility for any effects arising from errors or omissions.

Porsche Club Great Britain gives no warranties, guarantees or assurances and makes no representations or recommendations regarding any goods or services advertised on this site. It is the responsibility of visitors to satisfy themselves that goods and/or services supplied by any advertiser are bona fide and in no instance can the Porsche Club Great Britain be held responsible.

When responding to advertisements please ensure that you satisfy yourself of any applicable call charges on numbers not prefixed by usual "landline" STD Codes. Information can be obtained from the operator or the white pages. Before giving out ANY information regarding cars, or any other items for sale, please satisfy yourself that any potential purchaser is bona fide.

Directors of the Board of Porsche Club GB, Club Office Staff, Register Secretaries and Regional Organisers are often requested by Club members to provide information on matters connected with their cars and other matters referred to in the Club Rules. Such information, advice and assistance provided by such persons is given in good faith and is based on the personal experience and knowledge of the individual concerned.

Neither Porsche Club GB, nor any of the aforementioned, shall be under any liability in respect of any such information, advice or assistance given to members. Members are advised to consult qualified specialists for information, advice and assistance on matters connected with their cars at all times.

Back
Top