You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Dyno Day 2
- Thread starter twinny
- Start date
In the "backside" dyno the car really pulls strong now and above 5000rpm the torque keeps going whereas before it dropped away quite a bit. The chart reflects this as well.
Steve
Guest
New member
I think its fantastic that an exhaust and custom chip can get you close to 250hp on an internally standard 3.2. Great job guys.
RB
PS - I will be sure to let you know when I hit 270hp !
IanHighfield
New member
Thanks for sorting out Sunday - an enjoyable afternoon.
My V2 chip wasn't as good as the V1, and SW reckons I should run with that as it is as good as I will get without constant tweeking.
Your graphs are the same 'shape' as mine, so I guess that SW Chip will see both lines 'lifted' up a couple of squares on the graph. See my attached run of the 256bhp and 240ft/lbs torque. Given you are starting from ~5bhp more with your exhaust, it will be interesting to see if the chip makes 260bhp for you !
IanHighfield
New member
Hi Richard,ORIGINAL: Richard Bernau
Those are some great curves guys - for essentially std engines. The peak torque on 911MOT's curve is one of the highest I have seen. Higher than mine on my last 260hp run, though the Supercup cams make a much flatter torque curve so the area under it is still larger.
PS - I will be sure to let you know when I hit 270hp !
SW was dissappointed with my V2 chip, but now believes he is getting a handle on the Weltmeister readings in general, and feels the AFR may be reading a little differently to the 'real' numbers on Lambda. Although my V2 chip made the same 256bhp, it was down on bhp and torque right until it peaked at ~6000rpm - i.e. he raised the power there but killed it low down. He has told me to stick with V1, as 256bhp and 240ft/lbs are great numbers - it is the torque number I am most pleased with really.
The 911 book by Paul Frere shows peak power at ~5,750rpm.
Steve Murley
New member
Thanks for organising Sunday, My SW chip not available yet, but should be in place by the next Dyno day,
If I hadn't seen it with my own eyes I would never believe you would have got such a big rise in BHP by bolting on a bake bean can as an exhaust system[
Adrian, great figures for your car as well, some people are certainly raising the bar now. The SW chips are proving there worth as well.
I think Ian at Hayward & Scott would consider that quite a lot of time and money has gone into research before actually selecting which brand of baked beans and therefore by definition, which tin is best suited to the job.
I'm told the real skill though comes in steaming off the label first so they don't leave any tell-tale glue behind which could be analysed thus identifying the tin's source (or should that be sauce!)
Steve
Steve Murley
New member
I am in fact very impressed with your Hayward & Scott system, its produced more than twice the BHP improvement I would have expected, also it sounded brilliant. I was hoping my half Zymol
polished bonnet might have produced and extra HP or 2 [
Cheers
I thought that Zymol wax should have made you an extra 2bhp plus tea and cakes whilst we were waiting it's that good!
Let me know.
Steve
Guest
New member
ORIGINAL: highfield
- it is the torque number I am most pleased with really.
Yes, that torque number is the best I have seen for any 3.2. It's much higher than my peak, though you can see that mine goes flat from about 4700rpm all the way to 6200rpm, and its only by 6600rpm that it really drops off the map. You are also above 200FtLbs all the way from 2700rpm on. The cams seem to be giving 300-400rpm of extra power and torque. Doesn't sound like much when I put it like that and think what I paid [
I am still staggered at the output of your car [
![IMG_0337.jpg](http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a323/RichardBernau/IMG_0337.jpg)
![PCGB - an official Porsche Club](https://www.porscheclubgb.com/forum/stamp.jpg)
Posts made and opinions expressed are those of the individual forum members
Use of the Forum is subject to the Terms and Conditions
Disclaimer
The opinions expressed on this site are not necessarily those of the Club, who shall have no liability in respect of them or the accuracy of the content. The Club assumes no responsibility for any effects arising from errors or omissions.
Porsche Club Great Britain gives no warranties, guarantees or assurances and makes no representations or recommendations regarding any goods or services advertised on this site. It is the responsibility of visitors to satisfy themselves that goods and/or services supplied by any advertiser are bona fide and in no instance can the Porsche Club Great Britain be held responsible.
When responding to advertisements please ensure that you satisfy yourself of any applicable call charges on numbers not prefixed by usual "landline" STD Codes. Information can be obtained from the operator or the white pages. Before giving out ANY information regarding cars, or any other items for sale, please satisfy yourself that any potential purchaser is bona fide.
Directors of the Board of Porsche Club GB, Club Office Staff, Register Secretaries and Regional Organisers are often requested by Club members to provide information on matters connected with their cars and other matters referred to in the Club Rules. Such information, advice and assistance provided by such persons is given in good faith and is based on the personal experience and knowledge of the individual concerned.
Neither Porsche Club GB, nor any of the aforementioned, shall be under any liability in respect of any such information, advice or assistance given to members. Members are advised to consult qualified specialists for information, advice and assistance on matters connected with their cars at all times.