Simple answer is that, as usual, the politicians don't understand the technology in this and so it is unlikely to happen. The prediction (or statement of intent) is made from a position of ignorance. Informed opinion offers us the view that the resultant increase in demand for electricity will require 7 more nuclear power stations or 10,000 wind turbines. On our recent showing we're unlikely get either of these done.
So, with the inevitable power cuts the roads will be clogged with EVs queuing at charge points and waiting for the power to come back on
Furthermore we are told that the metals used in the batteries (lithium etc) are a finite resource and so the whole idea is likely to be unsustainable in the long term unless some new battery technology emerges.
I'd be more inclined to take this seriously if we were also discussing hydrogen fuel cells...some of the manufacturers are already on to this.
So, with the inevitable power cuts the roads will be clogged with EVs queuing at charge points and waiting for the power to come back on
Furthermore we are told that the metals used in the batteries (lithium etc) are a finite resource and so the whole idea is likely to be unsustainable in the long term unless some new battery technology emerges.
I'd be more inclined to take this seriously if we were also discussing hydrogen fuel cells...some of the manufacturers are already on to this.