Menu toggle

Geometry Settings After Possible Upgrade

robwright

New member
It's time to uplift or refresh the suspension on my turbo. Not sure where I am going with this or what I will even be fitting yet but one of the possible options of course is coilover units. This obviously brings the possibility or lowering the car also. My question is if I were to go down this route of lowering (and I don't mean slamming it into the weeds!) then would the standard geometry set up for the Turbo still be extant (my gut feeling is no) or would it require some tweaking? Obviously it will need a full realignment after I have done this but was wondering if anyone has any past experience of suggested settings for a moderately lowered car? I would rather not chew through a whole load of tyres before I get this right if I decide to it?
 
it really depends on how hard you drive the car and whether or not it sees any track use? Happy to advise though as I've played around with mine a bit now for fast road and track settings. Last summer I was running -1.8' camber up front with a around 1-2mm toe in, max caster. At the rear I run 1.5' camber and 1-2mm toe in (per side). This made for a very nimble and controllable car with even tire wear. But I do drive it pretty hard... I'll now be switching to some more aggressive neg camber up front due to the race prep.
 
Sorry yes I forgot to say it will be fast road use only. Going from what I have been piecing together on the internet those numbers you give look pretty OK but it always good to hear from someone who has observed practical results. When you quote the toe in above in mm how does this equate to degrees?
 
Hi Rob, if it's tired just replace all 4 shock absorbers to Koni, or Bilstein and then have all the Geo set up to standard.

Then you won't have to go lower or mess with changing the geometry to something only best for track use.
Only lowering and adverse geometry will have adverse effects for road use fast or slow...

I've currently got a 924S 2.7 lightweight which is too low, too stiff and has been set with 1.5 neg front camber...

It's great for a ten minute blast with no traffic (in the way) and only on smooth roads, anything longer than 10 minutes and any road (B or even dual carriageways etc...and it's quite a ball ache!) the ride is horrendous, the suspension travel not enough and the compression (Spring rates) too high and hard..

The Word "Coil Over" is over used and abused, your current front suspension has a Coil over spring wrapped around the shock absorber, your current rear springs are not coils, but Torsion bars which twist.

So you could fit front Platform adjustable (ride height) struts, and lose travel and lower the car and if you really did want this the rear Torsion bars would also need to come out and be reset to another position to match the lowered front ride height..

Then a changed Geometry from the standard parameters will cause adverse wear on your car and the tyres, also follow road lines more and generally be more uncomfortable..

It's always a risk which you may not want to take ?, and any fresh replacement Sport shock absorbers (Koni or Bilstein) when changed as a set of 4 will be a dramatic different and improvement (with your original or even new Standard front springs), even against a standard replacement set like Boge Sachs etc...

I also recommend you change all the Anti Roll Bar bushes at the same time..

Roger

 
Hi Roger all good points there fella and well taken. When I say coilovers I mean with the option for lowering if I wanted to. Understand about the torsion bars at the rear although you can obtain a small degree of lowering on the rear eccentric cam if I am not mistaken? I certainly don't want to be dropping the rear trailing arms. I still want the car to be driveable so it may well be that I end up running standard ride height. Just exploring options right now. I think I will go with adjustable coilovers though just for the flexibility if needed. All the bushes on the car are fairly fresh. Control arms are practically new, as are the track rod ends.
 
robwright said:
Hi Roger all good points there fella and well taken. When I say coilovers I mean with the option for lowering if I wanted to. Understand about the torsion bars at the rear although you can obtain a small degree of lowering on the rear eccentric cam if I am not mistaken? I certainly don't want to be dropping the rear trailing arms. I still want the car to be driveable so it may well be that I end up running standard ride height. Just exploring options right now. I think I will go with adjustable coilovers though just for the flexibility if needed. All the bushes on the car are fairly fresh. Control arms are practically new, as are the track rod ends.



Ok, but any Coilover Kit will be from Spax, KW , Gaz, Avo etc....

And yes they will have front adjustable spring platforms, and yes you can adjust the rear Blades but not by as much as the fronts will allow?
So what's the point, especially when your saying you'll probably run a standard ride heights?

Also the worst bit is any Marketed Coilover Kit won't give your flexibility it will give you much stiffer front spring rates to what you have now, almost double!
which will cut in half the ride quality and you may not like this?
Your front struts come apart and you could fit new Koni or Bilstein Sport Inserts and then new rear telescopic complete units (Dampers.)

The front Koni Inserts are top adjustable, and you could retain your standard front & rear springs (Coil & torsion bar)

This is a very common scenario, (Which and what suspension to fit)
and the market is very heavily aimed at the boy racer market were stiff is king and sod the ride and Road handling!

If this is for you, go for it! if you're not sure and don't want to ruin the car don't do it. stick with tradition and just change the Dampers
like for like with Sport units. Even Straight replacements from Euro Car Parts like Boge & sachs will yield a substantial improvement,

Roger




 
Hi Rob

I have a GAZ gold set up (no rear helper springs or coil-overs, just torsion bar and struts at back), my rear was already re-indexed when I acquired the car so for me this was a no brainer when my tired old shocks needed replacing. There is masses of adjustability, ride height, damping rate. The difference from full hard to full soft is dramatic. As my car was already lowered I used a local place with a good rep for a full geo and I have good handling and even tyre wear. I played with the adjustment and have compromised at pretty much bang in the middle of full hard/soft which works well for my driving style and relative comfort for a sports car. I have also poly-bushed the front roll bar and have 968 castor blocks.

Had the car not been re-indexed I would most probably have gone OEM but I'm glad I went the route I did.

Stuart
 
This is an easy one to answer IMHE. My race car now thanks to NineX has basically the aggressive end of the factory geo settings + enough camber to almost get even tyre wear front and rear (in my case -4 degrees on the front, -3 on the back but could do with a bit more on the front maybe -4.5). Castor is stock setting for various reasons, rear toe is about -20 min each side, front toe is slightly out but only by a few to 10 mins. Handling is perfect. Corner weighting is about 10000% more important than small differences in or different alternative geo settings, some like more castor for example but I definitely wouldn't advise for any large toe settings on either end of the car as it ruins the platforms basic qualities.
 
Neil Haughey said:
This is an easy one to answer IMHE. My race car now thanks to NineX has basically the aggressive end of the factory geo settings + enough camber to almost get even tyre wear front and rear (in my case -4 degrees on the front, -3 on the back but could do with a bit more on the front maybe -4.5). Castor is stock setting for various reasons, rear toe is about -20 min each side, front toe is slightly out but only by a few to 10 mins. Handling is perfect. Corner weighting is about 10000% more important than small differences in or different alternative geo settings, some like more castor for example but I definitely wouldn't advise for any large toe settings on either end of the car as it ruins the platforms basic qualities.


I don't get this reply Neil being an easy one to answer for Rob's Road car?

He's reported so far in his thread replies that:

"I still want the car to be driveable so it may well be that I end up running standard ride height."

"I would rather not chew through a whole load of tyres"

So your aggressive (from road settings) "Race car" set-up with Neg 4 (front) and Neg 3 (Rear) Camber will not be perfect or ideal for
Rob's or any car used on public roads?

The factory settings are close to 1 degree Neg Camber and I'd also advise he sticks close to the stock castor and Toe.


R



 
I agree with Stuart - Gaz Gold is marvellous in quality and adjustability. It is also much easier to reach the adjustment knob at the rear wheels when You want to stiffen the dampening when arriving at the track than at say the KW 3 set which other wise also is a great setup.
I also have a fair bit of negative camber as I like my cars this way - I believe aprox. -1.5 at the front and -1.0 at the rear.
Wish You a Lot of fun testing it out ??

Niels
 
Rich's geo sounds fine to me. In your position I'd probably look at Bilsteins, - possibly with a coilover sleeve? Rear coilovers don't always mean re-indexing, (mine didn't) but I believe it's a bit hit or miss.

FWIW, KWv3 Coilovers are very comfy for road use, even mine with 500lb springs, much firmer than their std. I have -3 deg front camber & that's still OK for me. Car is comfy enough to drive to Spa / Nurburg. It's probably marginally harsher than my m030 Boxster.
 
edh said:
Rich's geo sounds fine to me. In your position I'd probably look at Bilsteins, - possibly with a coilover sleeve? Rear coilovers don't always mean re-indexing, (mine didn't) but I believe it's a bit hit or miss.

FWIW, KWv3 Coilovers are very comfy for road use, even mine with 500lb springs, much firmer than their std. I have -3 deg front camber & that's still OK for me. Car is comfy enough to drive to Spa / Nurburg. It's probably marginally harsher than my m030 Boxster.


Ok,
Yes to my knowledge Bilstein don;t offer an adjustable ride height strut and their Sport road shocks are an Insert using the standard strut housing with the fixed lower spring platform, which could be used with lowering springs if required.

A coilover Sleeve ? do you mean cutting off the
original strut spring pan and welding a sleeve to the strut body to use 2.25ID race springs?

Re-indexing the torsion bars is often required to change the rear ride height when the front has been lowered, the torsion bars
can be "left in" if rear shocks absorbers with higher rate springs than the torsion springs are being used, especially if going really stiff as the coil springs over ride the torsion rates and render them redundant.

500Lbs front springs is seriously HARD for the road !

I was discussing the V3 system with KW UK a few weeks ago and they quoted their spring rates were 340 front / 280 rear
which they said would be way too stiff for my 1030kg 924S Road car as also are all the other offerings from Koni, Gaz, Avo and Spax etc..
so I'm considering having a special valving and spring rates made to suit my lightweight Road application from a Dutch company called INTRAX because my current front spring rates are generally too harsh & stiff @ 190 & 220lbs front & Rear

The KW V3 System does use helper springs to assist & eradicate vibrations and also the inserts have a special valve for high load compression which releases oil flow and allows much more movement and (Comfort) absorption when encountering potholes and large underlations but with 500Lb springs the word "Comfy"? surely can't appear anywhere near a description on the road ?[/b]

That's a fully blown race car rate / poundage.

Dependent on how much lightening? you've done to your S2 (which lighter would make the car even more harsh ?)

Each front corner will have approx 700Lbs? in weight, which means your front suspension will only
drop from full droop (When jacked up in the air) by 1.4 Inches when loaded and back on it's wheels!

This can't be right? maybe the 500 is a metric or other format ?

On this thread subject of Suspension, for Rob & Other members considering Upgrading and wondering about
the Pro's and con's Here is some of the Info from a USA website in regard to different set-ups:[/i]

Basically, changing to higher spring rates for the front springs, torsion bars, and sway bars can benefit all vehicles in the 924/944/968 model line. The main benefit of changing to higher spring rates is reducing body roll during cornering. By reducing body roll, the tires maintain contact with the road longer. Other benefits are reduced squat during acceleration and reduced dive during hard braking.

[FONT=book antiqua,palatino"]Regardless of the spring rates listed above (in lbs. or Newtons), the [FONT=verdana,geneva"][FONT=arial black,avant garde"]maximum[FONT=verdana,geneva"][FONT=book antiqua,palatino"] spring rate for any (standard) 924/944/968 suspension is approximately [FONT=arial black,avant garde"]175 lbs. [FONT=verdana,geneva"][FONT=verdana,geneva"]

So, we need to pick a spring that is something greater than 175 lbs. if we want to improve handling. So, exactly how much do we increase the spring rate? Generally, spring rates from 200 to 220 lbs. provide a good performance improvement cars that are primarily street driven. For street cars that see some track time, spring rates from 250-275 lbs. are an excellent choice. I have seen some cars where 400 lb. springs are used on street/track cars. In my opinion, 400 lb. springs are entirely too stiff for a street driven car. They provide much too harsh a ride on the street. More importantly, as streets are generally much less smooth and hence much less forgiving than a track, they can in fact be dangerous on the street. To give you some idea of the stiffness of a 400 lb. spring, 944 Turbo (Race) Cup cars used 375-410 lb. progressive rate springs.

Example Suspension Setups
Sport Suspension
A good sport suspension setup for a car that is primarily driven on the street might include 220 lb. front springs, 27 mm torsion bar, 30 mm front sway bar, and 19 mm rear sway bar. Personally, I like a car that has very neutral steering characteristics. If you prefer to maintain the understeering characteristics of the stock 944, you might prefer a 26 mm sway bar to the 27 mm. If you prefer a car that oversteers, you might choose a 28 mm torsion bar. Just realize that a car that oversteers is much more sensitive to steering corrections and can you into trouble during a panic maneuver. With regards to the sway bars, I really like the 968 M030 sway bars. The reason I like them is that the 19 mm rear bars are 3-way adjustable which give you another option when it comes to changing the steering characteristics.
High Performance Street/Track Suspension
A good high performance suspension for a car that it used on the street and track might include 260 lb. springs, a 28 mm torsion bar, 30 mm front sway bar, and 19 mm rear sway bar. Again, if you want more understeer, you might choose a 27 mm torsion bar. And, if you want some oversteer, you might choose a 29 mm torsion bar. As I've already cautioned you about oversteer we won't repeat that again.
Full Race Suspension
While I've seen this suspension setup used on the street, I don't recommend it. A good combination for the track might include 400 lb. front springs, 31 mm torsion bar, 30 mm front sway bar, and 19 mm rear sway bar.


For further details have a look at the website:

http://www.clarks-garage.com/shop-manual/susp-15.htm



R





 
Just to chime in further on this...

It sounds like for Rob's requirements a new set of dampers and a decent geo set up might be the answer, but if your set on the idea of coilovers then I disagree with some of the comments on here that it will ruin the ride quality of your car. Providing you choose the right coilovers of course!.. Personally I'm not a fan of the Gaz's as the quality falls short in some areas, particularly with regards to the finishing (they rust like crazy on a road car used through the winter for example) and I find the damping somewhat brittle on the cars I've tried with them. Although admittedly I've not been in a 944 with them.

Spring rates. Don't get too hooked up on what you think will be too harsh for UK use. I run 300lb front 200lb rear + 23.5mm bars (approx 230lb effective wheel rate) with my Bilstein home-built coilovers (more on this in a mo) and I find them as compliant as the horrible squishy standard M474 set up. The damping is far more controlled and the car is still a joy to drive on the road (or at least it was until I removed the interior, sound proofing and had a cage welded in!!..). The point I'm making is that the dampers can have a far greater impact on the ride quality than just the spring rates would suggest. V3's are reputed to be excellent in this regard due to the twin-tube dampers which have in-built threshold valves which by-pass the low-speed compression valve during bigger compressions. Bilstein mono-tube dampers are also able to behave in this way to a certain extent. Also of more importance is the spring-rate balance front to rear, as this influences the balance of the car. Interestingly the V3's go against common advice amongst racers as they are a fairly balanced wheel rate (very much like the factory rates), whereas racers tend to go a bit firmer up front which is regarded as offering a more stable balance and allows you to get on the power earlier. Not so relevant in a road car, but the issue of stability is of course. But this is a much debated subject area in itself!

With regards to the reindexing the bars, I personally feel this is a must if you want to achieve a good set up without too many compromises on ride height and corner weighting. Plus is the bars aren't sufficiently backed-off then I'm informed they have a tenancy to work against the coils, which makes sense. On mine I simply backed them off by one inner spline, so the rear helpers are fully compressed and the car sits on the coils.

I really rate the B6 dampers if you can deal with the practicalities of fitting them. They're a quality, modern damper design that's very durable, however the cut-n-shut required on the struts is an issue for most people. However to show what can be done with them, here's my self-built coilovers using B6 dampers, my old M474 struts and quality coilover conversion parts sourced from various places/countries! The rears actually use proper Bilstein parts sourced from the US.

A93DFDDA-3084-4F55-84DB-BAB9A88E31C0_zpsxjunpwdj.jpg

31974CCA-6A88-4C7D-BCA5-7B6D27F916CF_zpszyixfs8x.jpg

(Disclaimer: these took quite a lot of work to build up and a lot of thought and research went into them. I'm an engineer so I know what I'm doing and trust my work, but I wouldn't advocate anyone doing this unless you feel the same!)

As you've probably already found Rob, there's a whole heap of threads on here regarding this subject so it's best to take your time reading them and making your own mind up on what to go with.
 
I have 300lb front springs which are not overly harsh btw. A good fast road occasional track rate of spring.

Stuart
 
Richair said:
Just to chime in further on this...

Spring rates. Don't get too hooked up on what you think will be too harsh for UK use.
I run 300lb front 200lb rear + 23.5mm bars


I think some people do need to GET HOOKED UP Rich and be made aware it is important to consider that an 80% + increase from a stock 160bs (ish) spring rate to a 300Lbs rate will affect the ride quality no question about it.

Whether it's received as tolerable for many doesn't mean it's ideal for all, especially when they are unsure or not.
I have heard many people declare having gone this route, that it was not a good move..


Are the spring rates you've quoted for the CSCC Race car, or another road car?

Is this race car being driven to the track?

Only your Bilstein are Road shocks absorbers on Rubber bushes, also did I see stock Rubber top mounts? and not Racing
valved shock absorbers or Bearing Top mounts? both of which would be reccomended for a racecar unless you have 2 cars

Also your front bar diameter is small at 23.5 ? You'll need a bigger front for Racing and also a Rear bar..

R

 
Driven my race car on the road with 600 lb/inch front springs. Not making this up but the ride quality was better then a friends old BMW 1 series (the first gen one). Total waste of time spending a lot of time and money on the suspension on these cars to end up running 200 lb/inch or so, your not really making the car any stiffer and worse on modern tyres all that will happen is huge amounts of roll and pitching about on track.

I should explain camber. Its irrelevant what anyone else uses, the right setting is the one which gives you in your car for your uses even tyre wear. In my case on my last (current) set of tyres 4 degrees -ve on the front has not been enough as my measured wear is more on the outside 1/3rd of the tyre. I know Alex Eacock for example was running 5 degrees -ve on his 968 when he won the club championship. For most people doing fast road driving around 1.5 degrees -ve is probably going to be fine, years ago I used to run 2 -ve on the front and 1 -ve on the back when the S2 was a pure road car.
 
Roger I chose those spring rates for road use and the odd trackday and sprint; at the time I had no intention of doing what I've done to the car now!! :ROFLMAO: At first I was apprehensive that they would knock my fillings out, but my research on what the yanks are up to suggested otherwise; they were right and I was pleasantly surprised at how good the ride is. Knackered old Koni's don't ride particularly well so most quality new suspension will be an improvement. The point I was making is it's all about the damper and spring rate package- firm(ish) spring rates with the right damper will ride well and be a much better car for it. I can point my car down the bumpiest of tight, twisty B-roads and never does it feel anywhere close to unaccountably harsh (and believe me I have paid good money for some very disappointing suspension kits and coilovers over the years that have ridden like crap even with modest spring rates...). The 944 is quite a heavy car in standard trim so it needs the spring rates to match in my opinion and its surprising what you can get away with! That is providing the dampers are a good match.

My car is being kept road legal, but I will be revising the suspension specifically for racing. I'll only use it occasionally on the road for the odd show or Sunday morning drive, so the next set up will be far more compromised! I was referring to the torsion bars in my post above. My front ARB is a 26mm and I run a 22mm Weltmeister adjustable rear, so everything is covered in that department. I could go bigger on the front, but I like my cars to be set up 'on the nose'. Eventually all the rubber will come out of the suspension and I plan on having the dampers re-valved, or swapping out to something else (although I like the billies a lot!).

I think it would help Rob out if he could possibly ride in some cars with different suspension set ups to see what he thinks feels right.

P.s. Roger I've just found your website, what a build!! Incidentally I've built a very similar front brake kit for mine using forged SL6 calipers...
 
Neil Haughey said:
Driven my race car on the road with 600 lb/inch front springs. Not making this up but the ride quality was better then a friends old BMW 1 series (the first gen one). Total waste of time spending a lot of time and money on the suspension on these cars to end up running 200 lb/inch or so, your not really making the car any stiffer and worse on modern tyres all that will happen is huge amounts of roll and pitching about on track.

I should explain camber. Its irrelevant what anyone else uses, the right setting is the one which gives you in your car for your uses even tyre wear. In my case on my last (current) set of tyres 4 degrees -ve on the front has not been enough as my measured wear is more on the outside 1/3rd of the tyre. I know Alex Eacock for example was running 5 degrees -ve on his 968 when he won the club championship. For most people doing fast road driving around 1.5 degrees -ve is probably going to be fine, years ago I used to run 2 -ve on the front and 1 -ve on the back when the S2 was a pure road car.



600Lbs ?? Great, Nice one....

Getting back on thread, Rob has asked about possibly changing tired original suspension for a Road application where from what I've read and understood he's not even sure about lowering the car if at all........

And we've got people raving about 300, 500 and 600Lbs Spring rates! and it's irrelevant what Negative camber is used ???

This application is for Road use boys, not the track! telling people that sky high spring rates and lots of camber will be fine isn't Helpful at all!

R
 
I think it's because you made some sweeping statements about "coilovers" making the ride untenable for road use, and a few of us who have 944's with coilovers & higher spring rates just wanted to debunk that.

The sort of setup that rich has looks great to me.
 

Posts made and opinions expressed are those of the individual forum members

Use of the Forum is subject to the Terms and Conditions

Disclaimer

The opinions expressed on this site are not necessarily those of the Club, who shall have no liability in respect of them or the accuracy of the content. The Club assumes no responsibility for any effects arising from errors or omissions.

Porsche Club Great Britain gives no warranties, guarantees or assurances and makes no representations or recommendations regarding any goods or services advertised on this site. It is the responsibility of visitors to satisfy themselves that goods and/or services supplied by any advertiser are bona fide and in no instance can the Porsche Club Great Britain be held responsible.

When responding to advertisements please ensure that you satisfy yourself of any applicable call charges on numbers not prefixed by usual "landline" STD Codes. Information can be obtained from the operator or the white pages. Before giving out ANY information regarding cars, or any other items for sale, please satisfy yourself that any potential purchaser is bona fide.

Directors of the Board of Porsche Club GB, Club Office Staff, Register Secretaries and Regional Organisers are often requested by Club members to provide information on matters connected with their cars and other matters referred to in the Club Rules. Such information, advice and assistance provided by such persons is given in good faith and is based on the personal experience and knowledge of the individual concerned.

Neither Porsche Club GB, nor any of the aforementioned, shall be under any liability in respect of any such information, advice or assistance given to members. Members are advised to consult qualified specialists for information, advice and assistance on matters connected with their cars at all times.

Back
Top