Menu toggle

GT P/P LONG TERM 944 FLEET CAR

Don't have my copy of the rag yet as things are a bit delayed in getting it over here on the wrong side of the pond.

How fast did he allege to be going? That is a pretty serious impact. What a shame.

 
I have been swithering about whether or not I should continue buying GT Purile Porsche, as frankly it has been getting worse and worse. This piece just puts the tin hat on it though ... I shall not be buying it again.

Not only has this prat written off a lovely car, it is a rubbish article, he doesn't appear to even know how the accident happened as his analysis ([&:]) is ridiculous, and nor is there any sense of regret at what happened. A perfect metaphor for the times we live in[:'(]

How much am I offered for a full set of GT Purile Porker?

John H (Disgusted of Kingskettle[:mad:])
 
I have driven a few early 911s and they do have less rear end grip / more momentum than later model 911s. I think late model cars are very different and driven with the same care as any 250+ BHP rear drive car they handle pretty well, especially if well set up.

Sad to hear this tale of a nice 944 get damaged, regardless of who was driving.
 
This piece just puts the tin hat on it though ... I shall not be buying it again.

Well turn to page 122 & 123 for the long term report on the 944 S2 Cab'. Talk about purile waffle and almost sod all about the car in question. There is a picture of the Cab interior, but then another two pictures of a Boxster?

Apparently, the S2 has done 73 miles this month as the author has "......been either on the beach or by our poll in Portugal." Not much of a report then!

I do hope that these people don't get paid for this sort of thing.
 

ORIGINAL: John Sims

Well turn to page 122 & 123 for the long term report on the 944 S2 Cab'. Talk about purile waffle and almost sod all about the car in question. There is a picture of the Cab interior, but then another two pictures of a Boxster?

Apparently, the S2 has done 73 miles this month as the author has "......been either on the beach or by our poll in Portugal." Not much of a report then!

I do hope that these people don't get paid for this sort of thing.

73 miles this month! My cab did 73 miles this morning plus another 73 this afternoon. And another 10 each way as well because driving all the way to the office is far preferable to stopping 10 miles away.
 
He does claim everything was fine and then suddenly the car understeered then bit - could've been that that front tyre went before the crash rather than as a result of it. Doesn't explain why the damage is closer to front-on than anything else though.

The rim doesn't look damaged on the outside edge so it could have gone prior to the crash but, as you say Fen, why is it that the front is wrecked - as if it hit head on - when Mr Newton seems to infer that the car spun?

As noted previoulsy though - I think he might be an anoying young person and perhaps better off in has Chavmobile.
 
I believe I met the chap in person, he was looking for a car at Brands and we had a chat about modifying the turbo. He wasn't wearing a baseball cap but probably owns several [;)]
 
Having driven the car in question, I would suggest that he young man in question simply ran out of talent first and road second.

His explanation does not add up, I am of the opinion that he had his foot planted firmly against the bulkhead and when it "lit up" events [including the rear end] simply overtook him and he was from that point on simply a passenger !

All that to say " He cocked it up"

Allan
 
Between 55 and 60.

Yes, but then he was into boost. And we all know how things change then [:)].

I wonder if 3.5K in third and then boosting before impact is for real. Whilst a fair old knock, I'd have thought a +50mph impact would have done more damage than that.

Gentlemen of the jury, I put it to you that Mr Newton did not spin, I would suggest that he just took the corner too fast, the front washed out, and he hit the barrier.
 
Gentlemen of the jury, I put it to you that Mr Newton did not spin, I would suggest that he just took the corner too fast, the front washed out, and he hit the barrier.

I hope someone has forwarded a link to this thread to Mr Newton.....


In Mr Newtons defence, could it be that we are looking at a left hand sweep, as the road swings in parallel with the dual carriageway.

I put it to you that we have a young man, excited about his recent purchase and inexperienced in high powered rear wheel drive cars. He is accompanied by his young photographer friened, who may well have never been in a Porsche previously. The dual carriageway approaches and this is the first opportunity Mr Newton has had to demonstrate the cars real performance. As he sweeps around this left hand curve he floors the throttle, and little happens, then - once the turbo pressurises - all hell brakes loose. The back does come around pushing the nose into the left hand barrier, but then, because of the momentum, the car continues to slide up the road with the nose aginst the barrier.

I would respectfully suggest that anyone with a Turbot who says he hasn't had the back end step out on him at some point is a lier.

Sorry for all the derogatory comments Mr Newton. We trust you haven't been put off by your Turbot experience and find another one soon. We may then enjoy your sundry reports peping up a mag that doesn't have great deal 944 exposure. Perhaps you would join us on a few of our 944 gatherings as there are many interesting cars present and we might all get in the mag as well then[;)]
 
Would you want to?

I cancelled my subscription - and as someone who buys foriegn Porsche Mags without being able to read them, that says a lot...[:mad:]
 
Would you want to?

Beaky in print, with his mates, oh yes.

He has been in previously. If you look at the helicopter shot of the record attempt with a magnifying glass (I know you've all already done it [;)]) Beaky is in the group of 944s behind the tractors comming up to Paddock Hill bend.

Signed copies are available.
 

ORIGINAL: John Sims

I would respectfully suggest that anyone with a Turbot who says he hasn't had the back end step out on him at some point is a lier.

My entry for "most memorable Turbo back-end step-out" was a Satruday morning in September 2002 on the way to Husborne Crawley, coming off the Countess Roundabout on the A303 where the hi-grip surface ends before the bend does. 3/4 turn of opposite lock at 70 and a bit and a very frightened Astra driver in the inside lane.
 
hi-grip surface ends before the bend does
Why do they do that?
I wrote a car off (non-Porsche) because of that 10 years ago. I might have run out of talent as well though, which I am willing to admit, but I learnt from it.
I also saw a Police car do the same a couple of years ago (in a different place).

Changing surface before you are straight is asking for trouble. At least it teaches you how to read the road, but if the road planners knew what they were doing, it could be avoided.
 
John

How on earth do you get Beaky to sign the photos.

Well it's not so much a signature as a near side front tyre print. This does have the advantage of detering young people crowding him with autograph books. It is a bit of a sod trying to sign credit card slips on PDQ machines though.
 
My "most memorable non-Turbo back-end step-out" occured here

9E903232D00648F69293316690B28918.jpg


on a wet Tuesday morning coming from the A67 onto the A19 south bound when the back end snapped out.

Luckily I was able to hold it on full lock but if someone had been coming up the slip road it would have been very a different outcome as I was well into their lane.

I thought the rear tyres were a little worn but after that I chucked a set of new Rainsport's on and the car was transformed [:D]
 

Posts made and opinions expressed are those of the individual forum members

Use of the Forum is subject to the Terms and Conditions

Disclaimer

The opinions expressed on this site are not necessarily those of the Club, who shall have no liability in respect of them or the accuracy of the content. The Club assumes no responsibility for any effects arising from errors or omissions.

Porsche Club Great Britain gives no warranties, guarantees or assurances and makes no representations or recommendations regarding any goods or services advertised on this site. It is the responsibility of visitors to satisfy themselves that goods and/or services supplied by any advertiser are bona fide and in no instance can the Porsche Club Great Britain be held responsible.

When responding to advertisements please ensure that you satisfy yourself of any applicable call charges on numbers not prefixed by usual "landline" STD Codes. Information can be obtained from the operator or the white pages. Before giving out ANY information regarding cars, or any other items for sale, please satisfy yourself that any potential purchaser is bona fide.

Directors of the Board of Porsche Club GB, Club Office Staff, Register Secretaries and Regional Organisers are often requested by Club members to provide information on matters connected with their cars and other matters referred to in the Club Rules. Such information, advice and assistance provided by such persons is given in good faith and is based on the personal experience and knowledge of the individual concerned.

Neither Porsche Club GB, nor any of the aforementioned, shall be under any liability in respect of any such information, advice or assistance given to members. Members are advised to consult qualified specialists for information, advice and assistance on matters connected with their cars at all times.

Back
Top