Andrew - Just found your response to a similar question posted earlier. Pasting below in case it is of interest to others....
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Hi Tom,
Unfortunately - I don't have any figures at present.
Dyno figures don't really reflect on all the benefits the
MAF kit provides. Also, what is achieved on one car may not reproduce on another. The purpose of the SciVision
MAF kit is to improve the overall performance of the car - including partial throttle response; WOT response; in gear acceleration; general smoothness; idle smoothness and fuel consumption. Experience has taught us that these properties (as well as ease of installation) are what's considered most important.
All the effort has gone into making sure the kit works straight out of the box and delivers a benefit the driver can feel. Consider this in contrast with the Link MAP kit (now discontinued). DYNO tests were done achieving 55% more torque and 40% more power. However, the Link AFM was so difficult to use and set-up and results were just not predictable - that in the end the power and torque gains (published) were completely irrelevant.
The
MAF kit on the turbo will not make as much difference (in pure power terms) as using the
MAF kit with our performance chips and a boost controller (it's the increased boost that makes the power on the Turbo). On the S/S2 - the gains are essentially drivability and torque based. Top end gains will not be so pronounced, but will be more so when the
MAF is used with a ProMAX Performance Chip and K&N Panel Filter.
Out of the first 10 kits, we only have 2 S2 kits left (all the turbo kits have sold). I wouldn't get too hung up on power claims - we have quoted them in the past, but they only tell a small part of the story.
When I have some time and a spare
MAF kit - I might get some DYNO tests done. However, in the meantime - judge the kit by the feedback of others. If it didn't work as well as it did, I don't think they would sell quite so well.
Regards,
Andrew