sawood12
New member
As always there is more than one way to skin a cat and to increase IC effiiency you can either go big or improve the flow of air through a smaller IC. I've often thought that, as George had just eluded to, the standard setup is not that efficent. Sure you can get lots of air through the front PU but it cannot escape from the engine bay that easily, especially since our cars have that undertray, therefore you get a cushion of hot air trapped between the rear of the radiator and IC that can't escape that easily and it ultimately impares the flow of air through the rad and IC - you get a bow wave effect in front of the radiator and IC preventing air from entering in the first place.
I've wondered that if you mount the stock IC - or a stock sized IC, horizontally or even tilted back 45 degrees and have some vents in the bonnet and some plastic fairing scooping the air from the IC slot in the PU up through the IC to flow out of the engine bay via the vents in the bonnet you'd surely vastly increase the flow of air through the IC and therefore it's efficiency. Not sure how feasible this is with the space available but it is a similar principle than the extra rad the 996GT3RS has that has the slit vent in the bonnet. I think i've seen some photos of this configuration in another similar thread.
I've wondered that if you mount the stock IC - or a stock sized IC, horizontally or even tilted back 45 degrees and have some vents in the bonnet and some plastic fairing scooping the air from the IC slot in the PU up through the IC to flow out of the engine bay via the vents in the bonnet you'd surely vastly increase the flow of air through the IC and therefore it's efficiency. Not sure how feasible this is with the space available but it is a similar principle than the extra rad the 996GT3RS has that has the slit vent in the bonnet. I think i've seen some photos of this configuration in another similar thread.