Menu toggle

Splitter

ORIGINAL: xenon

With people talking about airflow and the effect that different materials may have, I have to ask if this is seriouslt anything else other than a styling addition? Will this really make any difference on the road? I'd be surprised if it did.

Well at, ahem 70'ish [;)] on the motorway yesterday, I cannot honestly say that it had a marked impact on the stability or front end bite of the car so I'll 'fess up that I fitted it because I like the look - any aerodynamic benefit is just a bonus.

As far as parking goes, if i move the front PU forward by 2 inches, then.... no, wait.....[8|][:D]
 
I think I'm right in saying the ESS one is a copy of the splitter used by the racers in the Porsche Cup back in 1999-2001 (before 944T's were banned [;)] ). A true racecar would not bolt on something purely for aesthetic looks but you would have to be cornering at pretty high speeds to gain any effect.

If Andrew Sweetenham see's this thread I hope he'll comment as I know his racecar had one fitted when he put his 944T on Pole at Silverstone in front of the 996 Cup, 993RS and 964RS racecars. We promise not to mention he wasn't in the same position at the end of the race [&o]
 
Well we all look to race cars and F1 for inspiration but we forget that the appendages added to these cars have been carefully calculated and verified by lots of track testing and sometimes wind tunnel testing, and not just stuck on. Simply by copying something that looks OK does not necessarily mean it is going to have any useful function.

The problem with a car is that the distance air has to travel over its top surface is greater than the distance it travels under the car, therefore the airflow accelerates over the top of the car which creates low pressure (fast air has lower pressure than slower air) and hence lift. Any car therefore naturally generates lift. A splitters function on a race car is to restrict the airflow under the car and channel it around the car and works only in conjunction with a smooth flat bottom which is very low to the ground. This effect causes lower pressure under the car compared with over the top of the car and hence downforce through ground effect sucks the car to the ground.

Even if by pure chance and luck any splitter we add to our cars happens to be the correct shape to split the air in the correct proportions the problem is that our cars are too high up and to rough on the underside (thanks to exhausts, transaxels, spare wheel wells etc) to cause any meaningful downforce. Turbulent air kills any lift and any low pressure created under the car will just suck air from under the sides of the car (race cars also have side skirts that skim the track surface to minimise this effect).

So as you can probaly gather, I am very sceptical of the effect of any aerodynamic component on our cars (apart from the rear spoilers). They may cause better stability at high speeds, but that is a completely different thing to downforce. Any aerodynamic device that is designed to create lift needs very smooth laminar airflow to work. Any turbulence instantly kills any lift. Also with air not weighing very much you have to be going very fast. Even an F1 car's ultra efficient aerodynamic bits have very little effect below about 80mph - so what chance do the relatively tiny bits of foam and plastic on our cars have in creating downforce at any speed below about 150mph?

But they do look good though. The only reason i've not fitted a splitter is because it wouldn't last very long!
 
According to my tape measure, 13.5cm exactly

Thanks Nick. I make mine exactly 15cm, so you're obviously a bit lower than me.

Note to self, keep saving for KW...keep saving for KW...
 
When I got mine fitted the car did feel a bit sharper in the faster corners, though as I think I wrote at the time it was hard to judge whether this was in fact the case or just wishful thinking on my part. Either way on normal if spirited road use the gains are far more in appearance (if you like that sort of thing) than function IMO.
 

Posts made and opinions expressed are those of the individual forum members

Use of the Forum is subject to the Terms and Conditions

Disclaimer

The opinions expressed on this site are not necessarily those of the Club, who shall have no liability in respect of them or the accuracy of the content. The Club assumes no responsibility for any effects arising from errors or omissions.

Porsche Club Great Britain gives no warranties, guarantees or assurances and makes no representations or recommendations regarding any goods or services advertised on this site. It is the responsibility of visitors to satisfy themselves that goods and/or services supplied by any advertiser are bona fide and in no instance can the Porsche Club Great Britain be held responsible.

When responding to advertisements please ensure that you satisfy yourself of any applicable call charges on numbers not prefixed by usual "landline" STD Codes. Information can be obtained from the operator or the white pages. Before giving out ANY information regarding cars, or any other items for sale, please satisfy yourself that any potential purchaser is bona fide.

Directors of the Board of Porsche Club GB, Club Office Staff, Register Secretaries and Regional Organisers are often requested by Club members to provide information on matters connected with their cars and other matters referred to in the Club Rules. Such information, advice and assistance provided by such persons is given in good faith and is based on the personal experience and knowledge of the individual concerned.

Neither Porsche Club GB, nor any of the aforementioned, shall be under any liability in respect of any such information, advice or assistance given to members. Members are advised to consult qualified specialists for information, advice and assistance on matters connected with their cars at all times.

Back
Top