sawood12
New member
ORIGINAL: robwright
In general with all cars it is advised to change the water pump with the cambelt as a new tight cambelt will put extra strain on an already worn pump and cause it to fail shortly after. Or so they tell you. I think it is mainly garage profit pushing. When you get the belts off make an assessment on the pump, rollers and tensioners and then make a decision based upon what you see. I have never chnged a water pump on any car I have done the cambelt on and never once has one failed.
I've always run old bangers with high mileage and never ever replaced a waterpump or had any waterpump failures. Depends on what these pumps are designed for. My focus and S-Max has a timing belt interval of 100k miles with no time limit and there is no requirement to change the water pump so Ford waterpumps are probably good for the life of the car/engine. Failures are rare. Often disturbing these things can cause more problems than leaving them alone. Why should the tension of the timing belt be an issue on the waterpump and not the oil pump and rollers, idlers, cam sprocket, crank shaft? These things are designed to do the job they do.
Of course if you've been stung by a failed waterpump as 944Cop did then you're bound to be a bit wary - however as no extensive root cause analysis was performed on the pump to confirm the cause of failure we are only left to speculate as to the cause of the pump failure.
Jon Mitchell did post something a couple of years back when this topic was discussed last time and did provide some reasons why it is good practice - can't remember why now, but he is the only person with extensive credible knowledge that has come up with any real reason why. My other specialists have never seen a problem - and they were not new boys- - they'd been working on Porsches for 15-20yrs.
I think if I still had my car I probably would have replaced the waterpump at the next belt interval as the cost is not that high on a cost per mile basis over two belt changes.