You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
WANTED: 944 Turbo 250bhp or Turbo SE edition
- Thread starter Deleted User
- Start date
sutters
Member
Yes it just doesn't add up. Smaller boot badge indicating paint I guess but it's priced v low so has to be a story.ORIGINAL: A9XXC I had a quick look at it last night - miles from home just saw it driving by - was dark but looked straight enough, would want a good look in the day though!
DC911SC
New member
Ewan
New member
George Elliott
New member
Ignore them Oli .... They know not what they say.......ORIGINAL: zcacogpOh dear. And so the deluded come out to play .... [] Oli.ORIGINAL: Ex Skyline Make sure you buy a Turbo model. S2's are greatly inferior models [].
George Elliott
New member
Suffolk944
Moderator
I would certainly agree with all this. Having owned both a 220 and then a 250 I would say that the 220 is definitely the sweeter drive even if the 250 has ultimately more grunt. The 220 just felt nimbler and some how had more character than the later car - much of a cars driving feel is subjective of course but I think the difference is very noticeable between the two in this case.ORIGINAL: George Elliott Ewan, thats fair comment, I'm only saying from owning and driving one daily that there was something nice and balanced in the setup of my old 220. The 250 is measurably better - bigger brakes, wider tyres, more power, and that will get it good reviews in the press, (especially if the reporter wants to be at the next Porsche model launch in the French Rivera) but as a driving machine there was a sweetness to the 220. Dont know if you are VW Mk1 GTI familiar, I'm old enough to be, but the early 1588 engine was far nicer than the 1781 engine that followed. But the 1.8 was faster, torquier, and got good reviews as a result. I think sometimes the manufacturers put massive effort into the original attempt, and perhaps it was "right" at that point. But marketing requirements are that an improved version must follow. Just saying as the OP is looking, don't eliminate a drive in a really nice 220. Hairy sold a nice blue one, and Frenchy a cracking good Gold one, I'd have rated both a long way ahead of most 250's You are right too in that the later ECU is easier to play about with. [8|] George 944t
PSH
PCGB Member
I fully agree with Jon and others regarding which is the better car in so many ways...one of which is it weighs 150 lb less....the 220 is the true embodiment of the 944t...many would disagree but that's my opinion and yes i'm bias due to owning such a beautiful machine...220t early offset, no ABS and with deep dish teledials.....that's pure heaven IMHO.... PeteORIGINAL: Suffolk944I would certainly agree with all this. Having owned both a 220 and then a 250 I would say that the 220 is definitely the sweeter drive even if the 250 has ultimately more grunt. The 220 just felt nimbler and some how had more character than the later car - much of a cars driving feel is subjective of course but I think the difference is very noticeable between the two in this case.ORIGINAL: George Elliott Ewan, thats fair comment, I'm only saying from owning and driving one daily that there was something nice and balanced in the setup of my old 220. The 250 is measurably better - bigger brakes, wider tyres, more power, and that will get it good reviews in the press, (especially if the reporter wants to be at the next Porsche model launch in the French Rivera) but as a driving machine there was a sweetness to the 220. Dont know if you are VW Mk1 GTI familiar, I'm old enough to be, but the early 1588 engine was far nicer than the 1781 engine that followed. But the 1.8 was faster, torquier, and got good reviews as a result. I think sometimes the manufacturers put massive effort into the original attempt, and perhaps it was "right" at that point. But marketing requirements are that an improved version must follow. Just saying as the OP is looking, don't eliminate a drive in a really nice 220. Hairy sold a nice blue one, and Frenchy a cracking good Gold one, I'd have rated both a long way ahead of most 250's You are right too in that the later ECU is easier to play about with. [8|] George 944t
Suffolk944
Moderator
Had exactly that Pete and then sold it [&o] Admittedly there was quite a compression issue in one of the cylinders but wish I had looked into getting it sorted in more depth before selling the car (yes I did declare the problem to the new owner and sold it for an absolute song !)ORIGINAL: PSH ...220t early offset, no ABS and with deep dish teledials.....that's pure heaven IMHO.... Pete
andrew_churcher
New member
Your current car is stunning though Jon so hardly slumming itORIGINAL: Suffolk944Had exactly that Pete and then sold it [&o] Admittedly there was quite a compression issue in one of the cylinders but wish I had looked into getting it sorted in more depth before selling the car (yes I did declare the problem to the new owner and sold it for an absolute song !)ORIGINAL: PSH ...220t early offset, no ABS and with deep dish teledials.....that's pure heaven IMHO.... Pete
It’s the (wrong) smaller turbo badge from a 911[8|].Yes it just doesn't add up. Smaller boot badge indicating paint I guess but it's priced v low so has to be a story.
Suffolk944
Moderator
Well its not so bad I guess Andrew [] Just a very different feeling car from the early ones.ORIGINAL: andrew_churcherYour current car is stunning though Jon so hardly slumming itORIGINAL: Suffolk944Had exactly that Pete and then sold it [&o] Admittedly there was quite a compression issue in one of the cylinders but wish I had looked into getting it sorted in more depth before selling the car (yes I did declare the problem to the new owner and sold it for an absolute song !)ORIGINAL: PSH ...220t early offset, no ABS and with deep dish teledials.....that's pure heaven IMHO.... Pete
Posts made and opinions expressed are those of the individual forum members
Use of the Forum is subject to the Terms and Conditions
Disclaimer
The opinions expressed on this site are not necessarily those of the Club, who shall have no liability in respect of them or the accuracy of the content. The Club assumes no responsibility for any effects arising from errors or omissions.
Porsche Club Great Britain gives no warranties, guarantees or assurances and makes no representations or recommendations regarding any goods or services advertised on this site. It is the responsibility of visitors to satisfy themselves that goods and/or services supplied by any advertiser are bona fide and in no instance can the Porsche Club Great Britain be held responsible.
When responding to advertisements please ensure that you satisfy yourself of any applicable call charges on numbers not prefixed by usual "landline" STD Codes. Information can be obtained from the operator or the white pages. Before giving out ANY information regarding cars, or any other items for sale, please satisfy yourself that any potential purchaser is bona fide.
Directors of the Board of Porsche Club GB, Club Office Staff, Register Secretaries and Regional Organisers are often requested by Club members to provide information on matters connected with their cars and other matters referred to in the Club Rules. Such information, advice and assistance provided by such persons is given in good faith and is based on the personal experience and knowledge of the individual concerned.
Neither Porsche Club GB, nor any of the aforementioned, shall be under any liability in respect of any such information, advice or assistance given to members. Members are advised to consult qualified specialists for information, advice and assistance on matters connected with their cars at all times.