Menu toggle

What do you think of this... electric supercharger!

I keep the 4.6 Range Rover for that particular section of the community!

[:D] [:D] [:D]

ORIGINAL: tommo951

Rick

I expected more from you mate!
I really thought WUF was going to be the first 944 powered by an enclosed nucleur reactor!!
You would even get the green lobby supporting you!
 
The guys sold around 700 of these in six months, with suprisingly (worringly) little negative feedback.

Take the price of the resistor and first class postage out of the equation, and he's made over £3k.

Proof that people really can make money out of nothing!
 
Exactly Carl - we may realise this stuff is absolute garbage, but these guys are making a good living out of this crap.[&:]

The resistor guy even rubbishes the opposition
"NOTE: Please don't confuse these with the cheaper ones that other sellers are selling, they will damage your car. These modules are ceramic coated, not the cheap imitation carbon film resistors!"

Unbelieveable![:mad:]
 
It occurs to me that the electric supercharger is more likely to be detrimental to performance rather than increase it.

The likelihood of a motor that small being able to flow enough air to create anything approaching positive manifold pressure is laughable. However, as it is mounted in the inlet tract it is a restriction to the air flow. At low air speeds it might flow enough air to offset its own restriction and perhaps even make up for the added drag on the alternator. However, there must be a time when the air flow is too great and the fan is stalling the air.

Now here is a product for Simon....The Jet Supercharger. Obviously I don't understand jet engines but they have something to do with compressing air, adding fuel and using magic. What about if you put a small jet engine in the inlet track? Granted you might have to increase the intercooler a little bit and replace the oxygen that had been burnt by the jet motor but these issues can't be insurmountable.[8|]
 
Am just gutted they they only work on cars manufactured from 1988 onwards, will just have to do without one I guess [:eek:] [;)]
 
ORIGINAL: John Sims
What about if you put a small jet engine in the inlet track?

Damn you Mr Sims, you just foiled my latest EBAY idea[:mad:]

Can you imagine how peeved the resistor guys will be when we start selling our jet engined inlet superchargers :ROFLMAO:
 
Firing into the intake with a jet turbine would be no good.... but...

Hmmm.... maybe a Jet turbine firing into the hot side of a turbo to make it so its allways spooled up to produce full boost..... with the cold side plumbed up in the usual way.

Simon may have an idea if this would work.... but it would not be cheap! do you know how much those minature jet turbines that Simon builds cost???...

I want a remote control helicopter with one in it.... I really want one... But its not going to happen... I could buy a nice 944 turbo for the total cost of one of those!


 
ORIGINAL: Indi9xx

..... maybe a Jet turbine firing into the hot side of a turbo to make it so its allways spooled up to produce full boost..... with the cold side plumbed up in the usual way......

As the Turbo is a turbine and the cylinders are compressing air against it wouldn't just adding air and fuel into the exhaust do it? I seem to recal they do something simillar with rally cars to keep the turbo spooled which is why they bang so much on closed throttle.

There again, as you are adding air and fuel to an air stream that isn't a jet but a rocket.
 
Wouldn't it be easier to put the rocket/jet in the boot pointing out the back..This would stop the 911 boys whining about the engine being in the wrong place[:D]
 
ORIGINAL: chrisdenton

Wouldn't it be easier to put the rocket/jet in the boot pointing out the back..This would stop the 911 boys whining about the engine being in the wrong place[:D]
As well as providing an elegant solution to pesky tailgaters ...

In fact, get it right and you could probably either eliminate or over-expose any Gatso trying to take a picture of you ...


Oli.
 

Posts made and opinions expressed are those of the individual forum members

Use of the Forum is subject to the Terms and Conditions

Disclaimer

The opinions expressed on this site are not necessarily those of the Club, who shall have no liability in respect of them or the accuracy of the content. The Club assumes no responsibility for any effects arising from errors or omissions.

Porsche Club Great Britain gives no warranties, guarantees or assurances and makes no representations or recommendations regarding any goods or services advertised on this site. It is the responsibility of visitors to satisfy themselves that goods and/or services supplied by any advertiser are bona fide and in no instance can the Porsche Club Great Britain be held responsible.

When responding to advertisements please ensure that you satisfy yourself of any applicable call charges on numbers not prefixed by usual "landline" STD Codes. Information can be obtained from the operator or the white pages. Before giving out ANY information regarding cars, or any other items for sale, please satisfy yourself that any potential purchaser is bona fide.

Directors of the Board of Porsche Club GB, Club Office Staff, Register Secretaries and Regional Organisers are often requested by Club members to provide information on matters connected with their cars and other matters referred to in the Club Rules. Such information, advice and assistance provided by such persons is given in good faith and is based on the personal experience and knowledge of the individual concerned.

Neither Porsche Club GB, nor any of the aforementioned, shall be under any liability in respect of any such information, advice or assistance given to members. Members are advised to consult qualified specialists for information, advice and assistance on matters connected with their cars at all times.

Back
Top