Hilux
New member
With this regard the 959 is essentially a modified 911 with an ugly bodykit and as dull from the inside (*) as any air-cooled 911 can get, regardless how fast it can go.
For me the Carrera GT is simply not outrageous enough. How can you consider it in the same league as the Pagani Zonda or the Murchiellago for example? It may be as quick if not quicker, but it's too 'normal'. Too much like a Boxster on steroids. The average Joe Bloggs who isn't into cars at all might see a Carrera GT pootling down the road and probably wouldn't bat an eyelid, but if he saw the Pagani he'd know it was something out of the ordinary. I think that is the point i'm trying to get to and in my mind what sets true Supercars apart.
I personally dont believe aesthetics is all a supercar needs to be called one? On that basis however I will concede a few points. I love the Koenigsegg (spelling??)
Me?........I personally have always considered what constitutes a 'supercar' is based upon on its dynamics, eg: whatever I`m driving I only see it from the inside anyway. The 944 for me is a bit of an ugly duckling from the rear BUT its what it does that counts. What about older cars? Lambo`s, `raris, Masers, De Tomaso, Iso`s