Don't know whether I should be pleased or not with this photo! Had geometry set up at Centergravity the day before! Great day at CC, very quiet, only about 16ish cars, open pit lane for most of the day. The PDK was excellent and "involving" in manual! Note the Gen 1 Carrera S wheels (2nd hand for track day use only!)
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Castle Combe today!
- Thread starter tscaptain
- Start date
So many responses....
"Does your 997 feel light at the front"
"Do numberplates give cars a character?"
....and so on[]
Looks great by the way [8D]
"Does your 997 feel light at the front"
"Do numberplates give cars a character?"
....and so on[]
Looks great by the way [8D]
Actually Mark, after Chris had changed the geometry (what it came with from the factory was all over the place!) the front end doesn't feel light at all. It felt really planted all the way round, even with 3 wheels on the ground!
Think we did number plates on another thread!!
Great fun day had by all[]
Think we did number plates on another thread!!
Great fun day had by all[]
Well, to be precise Peter it went something like this....
On rears different camber each side, both outside factory tolerance (too much negative) Left rear toe in too much and outside tolerance.
Fronts - left camber outside tolerance and different from right. Both front toe out giving total of -0.13 (tolerance is 0 to +0.05!!!) Apart from that it was beautifully set up! Not bad for a 7 month old car with 3k on the clock![] I suppose the OPC would say it has "settled on it's springs"!
Chris set less -ve camber on rears to make it less understeery (and not wear out the rears so quickly!) and equalised the front cambers on the -ve end of tolerance to give a bit more bite. Also slightly toe in overall for stability over the bumpy stuff. At least I think that all that he told me. 4 hours with Chris and you get a bombardment of info![] He aimed for a "neutral" set up for fast road/occasional track
I thought it handled ok (ish) before but is lovely now. After a couple of sessions on track today I felt really confident in the car. Money really well spent and a masterclass in geometry to boot.
Alan
On rears different camber each side, both outside factory tolerance (too much negative) Left rear toe in too much and outside tolerance.
Fronts - left camber outside tolerance and different from right. Both front toe out giving total of -0.13 (tolerance is 0 to +0.05!!!) Apart from that it was beautifully set up! Not bad for a 7 month old car with 3k on the clock![] I suppose the OPC would say it has "settled on it's springs"!
Chris set less -ve camber on rears to make it less understeery (and not wear out the rears so quickly!) and equalised the front cambers on the -ve end of tolerance to give a bit more bite. Also slightly toe in overall for stability over the bumpy stuff. At least I think that all that he told me. 4 hours with Chris and you get a bombardment of info![] He aimed for a "neutral" set up for fast road/occasional track
I thought it handled ok (ish) before but is lovely now. After a couple of sessions on track today I felt really confident in the car. Money really well spent and a masterclass in geometry to boot.
Alan
Hi Marc,
Brakes were fine, some interesting smells from various parts of the car after each session (and I don't mean from the inside!) I think I was getting an average around 80, topping out at 135 just before you brake for Quarry. Had to let quite a lot of air out of the rears in particular to keep the pressures around 40 (That's what Chris told me to do!). It was my first time at CG and well worth it!
Brakes were fine, some interesting smells from various parts of the car after each session (and I don't mean from the inside!) I think I was getting an average around 80, topping out at 135 just before you brake for Quarry. Had to let quite a lot of air out of the rears in particular to keep the pressures around 40 (That's what Chris told me to do!). It was my first time at CG and well worth it!
Hi Chris,
[][][]
PDK in Auto and Sport+ is unbelievably quick and always in the right gear. Guys on the pitlane wall commented on fast the change was as I went from 3rd to 4th past them! It does rev the nuts off though. I used the day to experiment really, trying all the diffferent options.
[][][]
PDK in Auto and Sport+ is unbelievably quick and always in the right gear. Guys on the pitlane wall commented on fast the change was as I went from 3rd to 4th past them! It does rev the nuts off though. I used the day to experiment really, trying all the diffferent options.
ORIGINAL: MarcBC
Hmm, perhaps I should book a CentreGravity session.
I was with Chris at Center Gravity all yesterday - and I can now declare that, after much modification and experimentation, I have found Porsche 911 nirvana!! (I will write up a big report later)
Alan - great pic, glad you had fun!!
ORIGINAL: tscaptain
Great day at CC, very quiet, only about 16ish cars, open pit lane for most of the day.
I was going to go and watch, but thought it was the 21st.
Now been informed there was a printing error in PP []
john crannis
New member
Would agree a great photo, but I am puzzled that geometry settings could be outside factory tollerances in six months of use, or maybe
there is insufficient time given to weight the seating, allow for empty fuel tank etc. to adjust correctly on the tight production line.
Porsche insist that all used cars for sale have their geometry checked and corrected. Surely this could be extended to new cars in the
pre-delivery check without hurting the pocket of the OPC.
john
there is insufficient time given to weight the seating, allow for empty fuel tank etc. to adjust correctly on the tight production line.
Porsche insist that all used cars for sale have their geometry checked and corrected. Surely this could be extended to new cars in the
pre-delivery check without hurting the pocket of the OPC.
john
You and me both, John! But I have the print outs to prove it! One can only assume that they weren't in tolerance in the first place. Certainly is both more stable at speed and better balanced than before. I think the greatest deviation from the factory tolerance was on the rear cambers - which certainly could be due to settling down on the springs/compression after 3K driving?ORIGINAL: john crannis
but I am puzzled that geometry settings could be outside factory tollerances in six months of use,
john
Jane Smart
PCGB Member and Party-Girl
Alan, that is a really great picture and as someone pointed out, one to be enlarged for the garage wall I think []
garyw
Moderator
ORIGINAL: tscaptain
You and me both, John! But I have the print outs to prove it! One can only assume that they weren't in tolerance in the first place. Certainly is both more stable at speed and better balanced than before. I think the greatest deviation from the factory tolerance was on the rear cambers - which certainly could be due to settling down on the springs/compression after 3K driving?ORIGINAL: john crannis
but I am puzzled that geometry settings could be outside factory tollerances in six months of use,
john
My car had settled over time thus altering the settings, you will read how much Alex's had settled in just a short time aswell and thats after a new suspension setup.
You would hope they are checked at PDI though wouldn't you []
As ever standard setting are to cover the worldwide supply and many of us have had a slight tweak for our own personal requirements.
garyw
ORIGINAL: garyw
My car had settled over time thus altering the settings, you will read how much Alex's had settled in just a short time aswell and thats after a new suspension setup.
Yup: http://www.porscheclubgbforum.com/fb.asp?m=439948
Posts made and opinions expressed are those of the individual forum members
Use of the Forum is subject to the Terms and Conditions
Disclaimer
The opinions expressed on this site are not necessarily those of the Club, who shall have no liability in respect of them or the accuracy of the content. The Club assumes no responsibility for any effects arising from errors or omissions.
Porsche Club Great Britain gives no warranties, guarantees or assurances and makes no representations or recommendations regarding any goods or services advertised on this site. It is the responsibility of visitors to satisfy themselves that goods and/or services supplied by any advertiser are bona fide and in no instance can the Porsche Club Great Britain be held responsible.
When responding to advertisements please ensure that you satisfy yourself of any applicable call charges on numbers not prefixed by usual "landline" STD Codes. Information can be obtained from the operator or the white pages. Before giving out ANY information regarding cars, or any other items for sale, please satisfy yourself that any potential purchaser is bona fide.
Directors of the Board of Porsche Club GB, Club Office Staff, Register Secretaries and Regional Organisers are often requested by Club members to provide information on matters connected with their cars and other matters referred to in the Club Rules. Such information, advice and assistance provided by such persons is given in good faith and is based on the personal experience and knowledge of the individual concerned.
Neither Porsche Club GB, nor any of the aforementioned, shall be under any liability in respect of any such information, advice or assistance given to members. Members are advised to consult qualified specialists for information, advice and assistance on matters connected with their cars at all times.