Menu toggle

For fun, not bar bragging, lap times, but fun..

Indi9xx

New member
On the subject of lighting the touch paper, as mentioned by ExSkyline for saying something controversal, like a Turbo is better than an S2 [:D], and for the sake of discussion...

The motoring press, for years have banged on about handling, Porsche worked for years to make a 911 go around a corner without swapping ends, koni, Bilstein and KW will sell you some wonderful goodies to make your car handle better, people search for the widest wheels for their cars.. For years we have all commended different cars that went round corners like it was on rails... the list goes on..

Sometimes, it takes someone to stand up and say.. "I have an idea.." even though, there is every chance that they might think the idea is a bit foolish, and everyone might shoot them down for it.. and for months I have had an idea burning in my head.

Do you own your cars for ultimate lap times? Or do you own your cars for fun?

Now stick with me for a moment, because this is not the kind of thing that you will hear someone like me say very often, but I would love to hear other peoples views...

I used to own a Capri when I was a nipper.. Everyone used to say "Ah Capri.. Does not handle well.. you want to throw a bag of cement in the boot.." But I used to think, it handles amazingly.. it goes around corners when I want it too.. But if I want, it will also swoop around a corner sideways in a completely controllable way, but at low enough speeds in the wet that if I lost it, the worst that would happen would be bashing a cheap to replace back wheel against a curb..

That car had far less power than a 944S2 or turbo, about the same as a 944 lux.. and it had 185 or 205 width tyres..

And I just know I am going to get slated for this, but.. over the years I have had all kinds of exotic cars, 911 Turbo's, a 993RS, 944's of every type, 928's even a Boxster.... And even though I have had fun thundering along at balistic speeds, and going round corners at mad speeds... That Capri, did something different, it allowed me to have some serious fun inside the speed limit. Especially in the wet..

It was not that it would loose control of the back end constantly, I don't think I ever lost the back end at any time other than when I wanted to.... It is that when it would loose it, it would loose it progressively, it was easy to wind in opposite lock and when you ran out of opposite lock, you could continue to counter the oversteer by modulating the throttle... lovely!

I was always disappointed with Sierras, they had an IRS back end which was more snappy, when they lost it, they tended to loose it quickly, compared with the Capri live axle.

But all of this was buried deep in the back of my mind, that is, until Jeremy Clarkson tested the Toyota GT86 (?) which he commended because of due to its skinny tyres and ample power to traction ratio, it was fun to drive at road legal speeds.

Which makes me think... A nice cheap 944 Lux, skinny tyres, some decent anti roll bars to keep it flat, some good shocks to make it predictable, maybe some lower profile tyres to lower the gearing, set up for fun, not for ultimate track times, could be a seriously awesome disposable daily driver and maybe even a great budget trackday (you know, the type that E30's and slower cars go to, rather than Porsche or supercar ones)

Don't get me wrong.. I do think drifting is the most boring sport in the world.. to watch at least.. and I do know this notion is juvenile and probably not very grown up, and probably condoling wreckless driving, albeit at road legal speeds..

But maybe... Just maybe.. everyone or some of us have the wrong goal.. Unless you really want awesome lap times on a track.. for fun.. maybe we should be looking at having some lower speed, predictable and progressive fun.. and I think the 944 Lux in particular would be up for it.

For high speed cruising, fast trackdays, the nurburgring, spa, silverstone etc.. A 944 Turbo or S2 is the daddy.. But for something to burn to and from work, something to look forward to rainy evenings, or to take out at night "Just because the roads are quiet", I think a car like this would be awesome, cheap and fun.

What do you guys think?
 
Have a look at my avator-look on Mike Pollock's Photobucket site-what do you see? -here & there a red 924S-bought off e-bay for £950-big cone filter (already fitted)-I've fitted 26,9 Dia Turbo front & 20 ( I think!) Dia rear antiroll bars-Spax front springs 30 lower-lowered the rear as far as possible without re-indexing the torsion bar-had the geometry set to -2.5 degs camber at the front 1.5 at the rear-left everything else as bought as it had had new discs & pads all round (no idea what brand) but replaced fluid with dot 5,1,

Would be nice to have a 964 trackday car but no money at present & the 924S is great fun & pretty much disposable really.
 
But maybe... Just maybe.. everyone or some of us have the wrong goal.. Unless you really want awesome lap times on a track.. for fun.. maybe we should be looking at having some lower speed, predictable and progressive fun.. and I think the 944 Lux in particular would be up for it.

I've argued this since I changed the Lux for the S2: it's less fun at real-life safe speeds.

The only counter-argument anyone's ever come up with is that it's a safety feature to have massive power for overtaking situations. [8|]

There will be a move towards lighter cars in coming years, the 4c is a perfect example of where things need to evolve towards in order to stay relevant. Even Clarkson is saying that the morbidly obese supercars are now dinosaurs, and smaller engines are going to become the norm. I think the Toybaru/Subota is a modern-day 924, and makes a lot of sense.
 
This is exactly what the Toyota/subaru GT-86 was made for, a future purchase for me I suspect. And also the reason mx-5's are getting all the "best car ever made" claims.

Dunc.
 
Hence presumably the chance that Porsche will re-enter the "budget" sports car market using 4 cylinder engines but with more punch than the existing crop.
 
Totally agree, the Lux is well underpowered but you do get a feeling that you can litterally throw it around and it won't bite. It may be the slowest thing on track but peddled correctly it isn not only great fun but not so slow.

Love it and cheap as chips.
 
Funny how it all goes around. Hello again Jon, we haven't spoken in over a decade, not since you and I were both users of one of the early 924 forums (long since gone), and I recall you as being extremely helpful back then. Well, in the intervening years I have climbed the Porsche tree, but decided the view from the top was starting to get fairly pointless, so have climbed back down to the 924 branch again. I agree wholeheartedly with what you are saying here, indeed I just wrote a piece for the 924 Club magazine, which says it all really ... reprinted here ... http://www.arthurlea.com/Stories/924/index.htm I suspect I'm on the same lines as you.

Do you still do the performance modification to the 924 2.0 n/a head? One day perhaps! [;)]

John H (Fife, Scotland)
 
I always thought my 924S was a nicer car to drive on the roads than my 250 turbo - well at least for 90% of the time. The other 10% was spent enjoying the extra shove of the turbo [:D]. All in all I think a 1200kg 944 is more enjoyable than a 1400+kg one. Thinner tyres and lighter wheels help too.

A friend of mine has just bought a BRZ so we'll see how he gets on - he previously ran an Integra DC2 for years & then got seduced by the power of an Impreza P1 which hasn't proved a very wise buy...
 
I imagine the GT86 was designed as just that, a good fun sport car with just enough power to have fun, but not enough to make it a right handful.

Same kind of ethos Mazda used with the very popular MX5.

I've read a few owner reviews on the GT86/BRZ and they will admit it initally feels underpowered, but turn the driver aids off and exit a roundabout with just a hint of opposite lock, and feels great fun. Still, there's room for an STi version!! I think Litchfield are already on the case.

But yes, I've had lots of cars far more powerful than my 944S, but at road legal speeds and with the amount of traffic on the road these days there were many occasions when it didn't seem worth it. I still miss that surge of power when you want/need it, but as I get older I certain appreciate the character of a car more than it's out & out performance.
 
Isn't the new Boxster and/or Cayman coming with a turbo-ed 4 pot soon?

So a 1200kg 944 is more enjoyable than a lardy 1400kg one, must make my 1300kg one with more poke about spot on then? [:D]
 
Jon
I would agree with your comments.
A 1974 VW Beetle 1300 was probably my most fun car ever.
People took the rip but I loved what I saw as my 911, and on frequent trips along the M40 to London it would cruise past Saab 900 turbos, Granada Ghia 2.8's (not white with red lines) Opel Senators.
My 996 GT2 or 964RS were not more fun in many respects which surprises some people.
The Beetle bent the odd rim out of a Tee Junction just as you describe[8|]. (I too had a Black '79 Capri 3.0S for a while)
Today a 944T is my nimble daily hack with hatchback practicality and 80's Porsche durability.
I drove a GT86 to check if there was a new 944 contender, it is not that car......
George
944t
 
Had a similar discussion many times stood around in the EMC workshop on a Saturday afternoon. They seem to extol the S2 without an LSD as having the best balance of on track fun and performance in the front end pork world. TBH sometimes on a trackday such as a Goldtrack one at Silverstone I have found it underpowered purely because you sometimes get idiots in the more powerful stuff driving past on the straights then holding you up in the corners, maybe I just need to lap faster to get away from them, lol. On the road I personally prefer cars to feel as light as possible, I quite fancy a little Puma or similar for a bit fun. We had a new MX-5 but TBH as much as liked the thing I find MX-5s are hugely over rated as a result of a particularly vocal fanboi base around them. None of them sound anything like a sports car which is one problem for me, the other is they have too much grip for the power on tap. The best thing about all MX-5s is they are dirt cheap to own. The most fun road car I have ever driven is still my first, my old mini with a 1298 hi-comp rally spec engine, front disk brakes, no servo, no ABS, no PAS but a car has to be light enough to make all that practicable.
 
Isn't the new Boxster and/or Cayman coming with a turbo-ed 4 pot soon?

Yep. It'll lose some character, but TBH most of the noise from cars now is faked through clever exhaust work!

Whilst I've only ever liked torquey engines, I'm resigned to having to go diesel to get it now. Adding lightness is a real tonic after the totally pointless excess of the Veyron, even the AMG Black-series cars seem to be losing the plot now.

I am with James May when he says that a car designed primarily to lap the 'Ring for one "glory" lap is a very poor car on a wet, leaf-strewn, potholed b-road in England. That's why an Evo or Impreza is faster than any Ferrari or Lambo in the real world. When it's driving the things along the harbour at Puerto Banus the hypercar might get you the right attention, but would you want to take them out on a Sunday morning just to play on empty roads?

The other extreme are the supposed "perfect" driving machines: the Caterhams, Radicals, Atoms, XBows etc. Best trailered to the track, and avoid the rest of the world laughing as you spit flies out whilst trying to adjust your goggles. They are too hard-core for enjoyable, regular road use.

Small, light, reasonably powered cars are the best compromise. The MX5 or GT86 fit the bill nicely, but a part of me would always be thinking that a Boxster is a pretty good alternative at around £10K or so. [8|]
 
or GT86 fit the bill nicely

Paul, I dont know if you have driven one of these, but if not get ready for a disappointment. I was delighted to read about them - 944's are getting on a bit and there is no real replacement in overall terms.
George
944t
 
Paul, I dont know if you have driven one of these, but if not get ready for a disappointment.

Not yet, although ! sat in the Subaru version and it seemed a nice fit, and a good-sized car.

Are you saying it's disappointing as it's too slow compared with a 944 turbo? I'd be looking to compare it to my old Lux, not the S2.
 
One of the best all round cars I had (actually built) was a mk1 Golf Gti, albeit it had a 2.016v engine fitted, light fast and fabulous handling, it was on coil overs, striped Perspex windows, caged and one bucket seat, lapped the ring in 9.10 I,spent a fortune on the suspension, spherical camber tops adjustable braces etc only to find that my 944s actually handles nearly as well without even touching the set up so god only knows how well it will handle with a suspension refresh!
 
Never really could bring myself to rip my old 944T apart for trackdays - it was too good so I`ve got a stripped Golf Mk 1 with 2.0l ABF - great fun [:)]

But in answer to the original post..........................and being of that Capri era agewise, I understand entirely where Jon is coming from......................

...........................you would have to go a long way to beat an early 115bhp MX5 on chinese ditch finders - a hoot in the wet and still handles fantastic in the dry. I may be biased but I`ve got one of those too!!
 

ORIGINAL: Neil Haughey

Had a similar discussion many times stood around in the EMC workshop on a Saturday afternoon. They seem to extol the S2 without an LSD as having the best balance of on track fun and performance in the front end pork world.


Having driven a turbo, S2 and 924S on trackdays I'd agree. (need to add the caveat of stiffer springs all round + lots of neg at the front [:D])
 
Wow.. That was a positive response! I have been tied up since I posted that and had half thought I was a little bit crazy... Instead, it looks like there are some like minded people here.



At the last track day I was on earlier this year was a Porsche only one, even though a (McLaren turned up) and I found myself mixing it up with a field of 996's, 997's, air cooled 911's and a 911.. Not to mention a couple of turbo's on track tyres and all the goodies.. I was in a bog standard 86 turbo, with no mods at all, and managed to keep up with them and had a great day when I was not plugging cat deleted GT3's into the PIWIS to clear their lambda sensor errors.

It got me thinking though that just as much fun, maybe more, could be had at trackdays for some lower powered or lower speed beasts, such as is attended by E30 BMW's, you know, your sub 200 BHP crowd.

I am looking into trimming down my fleet of cars I never use, and getting down to a couple of Porsche, in particular one car to do shows and enjoy the Porsche experience in, and the other will be a trackday and country lane hooligan car, and am seriously tempted to either have that second car as a 944 lux, stripped out, put on a diet, improve the engine and go have some fun, with the plan that if I do not get enough jollies with it, I will convert it to S2 power and have some more fun.. probably running 7J wheels all round and suspension more set up for flatness through corners, rather than maximum attack... But I am also tempted to build a 924 that I wanted to build back in the day, one of my heads, a decent cam and convert it to run on a 87-89 reprogrammed motronic.

Nice to see so many other people feel the same way though, I was half expecting some flames :)

And hey John H, great to see you still on the scene and back in a 924!!
 
Having used extensively on track a quick car, moderate cars and slow cars I can confirm that having the quickest car and spending all day passing people (or getting held up) loses its appeal very quickly. Racing is the only way if you have a fast car, slow cars are by far the most fun for track days. You can only ever over perform and can also push to your and the cars limit much more safely.

Dunc.
 

Posts made and opinions expressed are those of the individual forum members

Use of the Forum is subject to the Terms and Conditions

Disclaimer

The opinions expressed on this site are not necessarily those of the Club, who shall have no liability in respect of them or the accuracy of the content. The Club assumes no responsibility for any effects arising from errors or omissions.

Porsche Club Great Britain gives no warranties, guarantees or assurances and makes no representations or recommendations regarding any goods or services advertised on this site. It is the responsibility of visitors to satisfy themselves that goods and/or services supplied by any advertiser are bona fide and in no instance can the Porsche Club Great Britain be held responsible.

When responding to advertisements please ensure that you satisfy yourself of any applicable call charges on numbers not prefixed by usual "landline" STD Codes. Information can be obtained from the operator or the white pages. Before giving out ANY information regarding cars, or any other items for sale, please satisfy yourself that any potential purchaser is bona fide.

Directors of the Board of Porsche Club GB, Club Office Staff, Register Secretaries and Regional Organisers are often requested by Club members to provide information on matters connected with their cars and other matters referred to in the Club Rules. Such information, advice and assistance provided by such persons is given in good faith and is based on the personal experience and knowledge of the individual concerned.

Neither Porsche Club GB, nor any of the aforementioned, shall be under any liability in respect of any such information, advice or assistance given to members. Members are advised to consult qualified specialists for information, advice and assistance on matters connected with their cars at all times.

Back
Top