Apologies if this is harping on a bit but I am in the middle of a long discussion elsewhere about the merits or otherwise of the new Warranty scheme.
One side of the argument is that the Warranty has been declared invalid or refused, or would be so declared and refused, if the car was or had been fitted with anything, including battery, wiper blades, Paint Protection Film, tyres that were either not OE Porsche or had been fitted by other than an OPC.
My OPC assure me that PPF and or tyres fitted correctly by other than an OPC would neither lead to the refusal of a warranty nor the rejection of a Warranty claim.
I have asked this question, which I repeat:
Does anyone have any factual evidence or a substantiable report of a Warranty being refused or a claim rejected for any of the above items?
So far I have one, unsubstantiated, report of a Warranty being refused at Reading because of a non standard battery.
One side of the argument is that the Warranty has been declared invalid or refused, or would be so declared and refused, if the car was or had been fitted with anything, including battery, wiper blades, Paint Protection Film, tyres that were either not OE Porsche or had been fitted by other than an OPC.
My OPC assure me that PPF and or tyres fitted correctly by other than an OPC would neither lead to the refusal of a warranty nor the rejection of a Warranty claim.
I have asked this question, which I repeat:
Does anyone have any factual evidence or a substantiable report of a Warranty being refused or a claim rejected for any of the above items?
So far I have one, unsubstantiated, report of a Warranty being refused at Reading because of a non standard battery.