blade7 said:
u63af said:
Is that the 2.8 stroker?
i am starting to think of a 2.8 as I could then keep existing 2.5 head which has already been rebuilt, need to look into what I would need to do bottom end, think it would just be 3.0 crank, better rods and pistons with lower wrist pins. Not sure how you bed new rings onto alusil block, anyone knows if you can hone the bores? Don't fancy sending it away to get redone
All the info is on Rennlist but from memory it's a 2.5 crank with offset ground big ends to increase the stroke, Mitsubishi aftermarket rods, Chevy pistons, and thin wall iron dry liners fitted in the block. Close to 3.0 capacity, reasonably cost effective , and no need for a 3.0 crank/block/2.7 head.
I don't recall all of the details about Andrew's 2.8ltr but I do recall that it still had alusil bores, no liners fitted, there used to be a complete kit available from the states which I think contained, rods, crank and bearings, not seen it advertised recently, though.
Pete