ORIGINAL: George Elliott
Super Cars are vile, there is no pleasure in driving most of them. A good VW Golf would run rings round most of them on a wet twisty road.
Humm, I'm not so sure. The old school lambos may have been like that but not the modern cars, And I think many of them demand a lot of the driver, So whilst most of us couldnt hussle a carrera GT as quickly as a front wheel drive gold on a wet B road. Those wtih talent surely can. Plus, I think some of them are sublime.
George you raise some other interesting points, about low volume focussed cars. Porsche did the boxster spyder - I think that is close, although could have done with a few more tweeks. Plus lots of other companies have tried damned hard to get close. Lotus, did some pretty cool cars, Ginetta has done the GT race car trick really well. Caterham are masters at selling the same product with a little more power and grip. Even Toyota have done the GT86 (and subaru) of course. All aimed at balancing grip / and power. The look at what Renault have done with the clio and the megane. They made some truly mad road cars suitable for clubman racing. Even BMW have the MINI Cup, which is easy to get road legal.
Those cars are out there - you just dont get the porsche badge. The big challenge with Porsche has to be VW, why would you put a porsche badge on a car that another brand can cover nicely.
Whilst we are all praising the 964 (and I love my RS), it feels very accomplished to compared to a torsion bar car. I still think that the rawer drive of early cars is more appealing. Plus when the 996 came out I thought porsche had gone soft, then they did the RS, I didnt like the wet cars, and the RS was very showy. 10 years down the line, they look epic, and madly desire one. Porsche continue to do special cars, we dont always see it at the time.
Finally, there's a great quote in an article in petrolicious this week about a chap that drives an early 911T daily "any car I can drive and use a mobile phone in at the same time I dont want".