You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Are Spyders Becoming Extinct At OPCs!
- Thread starter daro911
- Start date
If anyone's interested, that pic shows the degree of reduced movement if you get the short shifter[]ORIGINAL: daro911You only have to check the price differences for a 360 or 430 manual v F1 single clutch systems that are no longer made for the answer to that one[] Fortunately for the Porsche manual owners those classic superb gearboxes and clutches will have a strong following for decades comeORIGINAL: Andy FaganThat's great!! It will make the manual versions more desirable as the last proper drivers Porsches [][][]ORIGINAL: daro911 [] Like it or not it is here and for the indefinite future too
Yeah their ads on the back are pretty cool. I've never been to them but they built a Cayman race car for a Chris in PCGB, so they must know their Porsches.ORIGINAL: rob.kellock Strasse ads always interesting on the back cover of Porsche Post. I always felt if they go to so much trouble with their ads the cars should be OK.
P.S. All in all, I think the 987 Spyder is pretty safe no matter what happens. It has a pretty strong following. But who reckons that the launch of the X73 Sports Chassis leaves little room for a differentiator on the 981?ORIGINAL: flat6 I think Porsche isn't publishing the sales figures for the Spyder because it was supposed to be a standard model rather than a limited production run and it didn't meet sales targets. Maybe in the future as a classic they will reveal it but for now maybe some senior egos were dented... I agree that a 981 Spyder is probably a long way off as a run out model for the 981, maybe even 981 gen 2 run-out model. If that's the case the 987 and 981 Spyders will be so far apart that the buyers will be different and the 987 Spyder's value at that time will be less likely to be affected than if a 981 Spyder was introduced in a couple of years I think. I also agree that a Cayman R using the ingredients of the last one won't cut it as the 981 is virtually all aluminium and weight savings will be little. They'll have to go further to justify it over a GTS with X73 Sport Chassis. However, the Spyder is partly about its unique looks and much of its weight saving is in the roof, so perhaps a 981 Spyder is easier to develop (as in easier to justify without stepping on the Carrera's toes) than a Cayman Clubsport which will have to go 'further' in performance development over a GTS. But I think a Cayman Clubsport would be so much more successful in the NEW* car market than the Spyder. Maybe the recent interest in the 987 Spyder will make them want to try again with a 981 Spyder. However, if that is many years away, the buyers who woke up to the 987 Spyder might not be in that market any more and 981 typical buyers of that time may not want manual roofs, so sales may flop again. Also, who buys these cars? People with £55K to spend on a new car or people with £40K to spend on a used car? Our Spyder is selling well as a used car but didn't as a NEW* car. Will people with a £55K budget want to buy a brand new car with a manual roof? I dunno. Lots of car enthusiats seem to buy used cars (no evidence to back that up but has anyone on here bought a brand new Spyder except rob.kellock, Andrew Killington and daro911's brother). But the supply of £40K used Spyders depends on people buying them new to supply the used car market. Porsche will be thinking about how many people will BUY a NEW one, not how many people would like to see them make one.
I'm also pretty sure that isn't true. Siy and Big E are both PDK cars I believe.ORIGINAL: rob.kellockGood to see our founding member buck the trend then [] Life would be dull if we all liked the same.ORIGINAL: MrDemon Every new member the last few months is a manual owner.
Pricing of the Spyder is very interesting indeed. At £60k they struggled to sell them. After three years, however, they are well above the usual 50% depreciation rate (i.e apart from one notable, high miles example, I'm yet to see a Spyder advertised starting with a 2). In my view the former directly lead to the latter - there being lack of supply in the used market due to poor sales when new. Added to this a fair amount of used-car-hype, £30-40k being an interesting price level for comparative cars (i.e. there aren't any) and second (or third) owners being true, long-term enthusiasts.ORIGINAL: flat6 Maybe the recent interest in the 987 Spyder will make them want to try again with a 981 Spyder. However, if that is many years away, the buyers who woke up to the 987 Spyder might not be in that market any more and 981 typical buyers of that time may not want manual roofs, so sales may flop again. Also, who buys these cars? People with £55K to spend on a new car or people with £40K to spend on a used car? Our Spyder is selling well as a used car but didn't as a NEW* car. Will people with a £55K budget want to buy a brand new car with a manual roof? I dunno. Lots of car enthusiats seem to buy used cars (no evidence to back that up but has anyone on here bought a brand new Spyder except rob.kellock, Andrew Killington and daro911's brother). But the supply of £40K used Spyders depends on people buying them new to supply the used car market. Porsche will be thinking about how many people will BUY a NEW one, not how many people would like to see them make one.
Yep, the Sport Chassis being an option on the standard 981 says to me, how will a bespoke 981 variant like a 981 Spyder drive any different to the standard car. Therefore, what will be the major differentiator over the standard 981 if they make a 981 Spyder? Much of how our Spyder drives is down to the chassis. The rest is weight saving but how much weight can they save on the 981.ORIGINAL: rob.kellock Sports chassis has been an option for ages on 981. Chap on Pistonheads just took delivery of a Cayman one. GTS is coming with PASM which probably suits the 981 well. Ironically, the way the market has gone, I have probably lost less in depreciation on my Spyder than I would have done had I kept my Carrera 4! Hope the Cambridge car sells quick!
981 with Sports Chassis is all bar a 987 Spyder although my money says around a track & twisty B roads I bet if it isn't quicker it's a lot less work to achieve similar results. However whilst eeking out 80+kg on a 981 Spyder may not be doable unless Porsche invest in ali front and rear wings there is plenty of excess left to be trimmed by saving from up high i.e. the roof The unique Spyder rear end, which is a design trade mark now and the extra bhp to at least match the GTS Boxster or if they had any real balls to match the Cayman GTS[] add back another set of super lightweight wheels and naturally a pair of buckets ... job done again[] Of course they will ditch the radio and air con but as we know apart from a few examples these get tick boxed straight back on again kachung kachung[] When would all this come to pass if at all .... last 2 years of life for the 981 Gen 2 so circa 2017/18[]ORIGINAL: flat6Yep, the Sport Chassis being an option on the standard 981 says to me, how will a bespoke 981 variant like a 981 Spyder drive any different to the standard car. Therefore, what will be the major differentiator over the standard 981 if they make a 981 Spyder? Much of how our Spyder drives is down to the chassis. The rest is weight saving but how much weight can they save on the 981.ORIGINAL: rob.kellock Sports chassis has been an option for ages on 981. Chap on Pistonheads just took delivery of a Cayman one. GTS is coming with PASM which probably suits the 981 well. Ironically, the way the market has gone, I have probably lost less in depreciation on my Spyder than I would have done had I kept my Carrera 4! Hope the Cambridge car sells quick!
The roof (21kg), seats (15kg) and aluminium doors (15kg) were the big items last time. 981 has aluminium doors. The the roof and seats will contribute a lot still, plus the other bits and bobs. My point was, with [potentially] less weight saving and with the 981 already using the Sport Chassis, would a 981 Spyder feel much different to a standard 981 with Sports Chassis? Yes all weight saving is a bonus to handling but the 987 Spyder's chassis played a huge part too...ORIGINAL: rob.kellock Presumably they can still save weight from a 981 if they removed the electric roof, fit light wheels, remove interior door handles, aircon, radio, fat boy sports seats etc. []
flat6 a 981 with latest design sport chassis might already make the 987 Spyder "seat of the pants experience" feel dated! So add back the Spyder look and the weight savings listed plus a good weight saving if front and rear wings were ali too and you might just end up with the best looking, driving, handling 981 ever made.ORIGINAL: flat6The roof (21kg), seats (15kg) and aluminium doors (15kg) were the big items last time. 981 has aluminium doors. The the roof and seats will contribute a lot still, plus the other bits and bobs. My point was, with [potentially] less weight saving and with the 981 already using the Sport Chassis, would a 981 Spyder feel much different to a standard 981 with Sports Chassis? Yes all weight saving is a bonus to handling but the 987 Spyder's chassis played a huge part too...ORIGINAL: rob.kellock Presumably they can still save weight from a 981 if they removed the electric roof, fit light wheels, remove interior door handles, aircon, radio, fat boy sports seats etc. []
Siy
New member
Yup... and also I was one of those chaps that bought (and sold) my F430 in manual guise.. it was definitely slower than the F1... but that open gate gearbox was the thing of dreams!ORIGINAL: billy1I'm also pretty sure that isn't true. Siy and Big E are both PDK cars I believe.ORIGINAL: rob.kellockGood to see our founding member buck the trend then [] Life would be dull if we all liked the same.ORIGINAL: MrDemon Every new member the last few months is a manual owner.
Siy is probably 100% happy because he has a PDK[][][]ORIGINAL: MrDemon do you miss the F430 drama now ? or now you have the Spyder are you 100% happy
Siy
New member
kenneth ritchie
New member
All sounds very confusing to me...... but maybe someone can tell me approx when my Spyder was made, registerd 10/Jan/11 VIn is WP0ZZZ98ZBS740830 Kenny SpyderORIGINAL: Andy FaganI just think 5000 is a big number. Someone mentioned that they see more CR's on the road than Spyders but that is always going to be the case as the Spyders tend to be hidden away in garages until the sun comes out (Except Cecil) []ORIGINAL: spyderwhite the last cayman R rolled off production line late feb 2012 so your car would have most definately been one of the last batch built in late jan 2012/early feb 2012, the highest number cr i have seen advertised in the uk is 1636.i know there are a lot of circas but i cannot be bothered to look for what i researched when i was off for 3 months with a broken foot in spring 2012 when i spent hours trawling the internet .but i bet i am close on 5000 crs ,they sold very well in the states compared to row.yes we dont know for sure where the numbers started or if any are missing but the chassis numbers give us a rough idea of how many were built
kenneth ritchie
New member
Bought my 997 GT3 RS from Dave at Strasse and they were excellent, also gave me fair trade in price for my 996 GT3 Kenny SpyderORIGINAL: flat6Yeah their ads on the back are pretty cool. I've never been to them but they built a Cayman race car for a Chris in PCGB, so they must know their Porsches.ORIGINAL: rob.kellock Strasse ads always interesting on the back cover of Porsche Post. I always felt if they go to so much trouble with their ads the cars should be OK.
Was manufactured 2011 so must have been fresh from factoryORIGINAL: kenneth ritchieAll sounds very confusing to me...... but maybe someone can tell me approx when my Spyder was made, registerd 10/Jan/11 VIn is WP0ZZZ98ZBS740830 Kenny SpyderORIGINAL: Andy FaganI just think 5000 is a big number. Someone mentioned that they see more CR's on the road than Spyders but that is always going to be the case as the Spyders tend to be hidden away in garages until the sun comes out (Except Cecil) []ORIGINAL: spyderwhite the last cayman R rolled off production line late feb 2012 so your car would have most definately been one of the last batch built in late jan 2012/early feb 2012, the highest number cr i have seen advertised in the uk is 1636.i know there are a lot of circas but i cannot be bothered to look for what i researched when i was off for 3 months with a broken foot in spring 2012 when i spent hours trawling the internet .but i bet i am close on 5000 crs ,they sold very well in the states compared to row.yes we dont know for sure where the numbers started or if any are missing but the chassis numbers give us a rough idea of how many were built
Posts made and opinions expressed are those of the individual forum members
Use of the Forum is subject to the Terms and Conditions
Disclaimer
The opinions expressed on this site are not necessarily those of the Club, who shall have no liability in respect of them or the accuracy of the content. The Club assumes no responsibility for any effects arising from errors or omissions.
Porsche Club Great Britain gives no warranties, guarantees or assurances and makes no representations or recommendations regarding any goods or services advertised on this site. It is the responsibility of visitors to satisfy themselves that goods and/or services supplied by any advertiser are bona fide and in no instance can the Porsche Club Great Britain be held responsible.
When responding to advertisements please ensure that you satisfy yourself of any applicable call charges on numbers not prefixed by usual "landline" STD Codes. Information can be obtained from the operator or the white pages. Before giving out ANY information regarding cars, or any other items for sale, please satisfy yourself that any potential purchaser is bona fide.
Directors of the Board of Porsche Club GB, Club Office Staff, Register Secretaries and Regional Organisers are often requested by Club members to provide information on matters connected with their cars and other matters referred to in the Club Rules. Such information, advice and assistance provided by such persons is given in good faith and is based on the personal experience and knowledge of the individual concerned.
Neither Porsche Club GB, nor any of the aforementioned, shall be under any liability in respect of any such information, advice or assistance given to members. Members are advised to consult qualified specialists for information, advice and assistance on matters connected with their cars at all times.