Menu toggle

Building a 400bhp+ 2.5 ltr 944 Turbo

it looks amaizing Pete,...i appreciate the work and skill that must take to make it look like that let alone work👌🏼👍👍

Daniel

 
I finally got to do the MOT today, had planned to get it done a week ago but wanted my son to check the car over first, he's a very busy man.

Needless to say, it passed with flying colours, no advisories etc. I use the MOT as a guide for the engine condition, ie checking the emissions, she's still good as new, close enough to pass if a new car. I only noted after getting home that they had logged me as the later year giving a 3.5% for a pass, for early 86 it should be 4.5%, 3.5% is after August. Anyway, a 0.64% for CO and 214 ppm for HC is a very good reading, my son just laughs at me when I worry about the emissions test, he just tells me that this engine will never fail its emissions, I think he's right, although if I recall it has been as low as 0.33% so might need a good blast on the motorway...:)

Here's the proof..

1Smk9ks.jpg


VvbE7wv.jpg


Here's the car waiting at my son's after he had checked it for the MOT station to call and say they were ready for me to drive straight over. I don't know how he finds the time to do all these cars, but then he is bloody fast. There's more parked out of sight too, clearly, he's doing very well and has a 5 star rating to prove it, good on him I say.

Everything seen in the picture is his unit, the small door in the corner on the left is the office outside door/fire escape, maintenance is the nearest door and body repairs in the far door. I know that my car is always in good hands when he works on it and it seems all customers to date would agree. The guy in the picture is not my son, that's Ash who's just built an electrics workstation in one corner and some large hung storage boxes, he's currently putting up a number of official approval/member signs. Inside there is my son Richard, Luis who's my son's business partner and does the bodywork, he's worked on true exotics like Ferrari, Aston, Porsches, Lambo's, you name it he's painted it. A truly first-rate highly experienced bodywork sprayer. " two other workers make up the crew, so far.

lIuPIFc.jpg


Yes, I admit it, I'm a proud father and also a very, very lucky one as I couldn't afford to fully maintain my car now that I'm retired...:)

Pete

 
well, two can play that game...:) there are many variables that give different results, today was pretty hot for one and the car hasn't been used much. I can share some past emissions results to rest your mind....

LCv0Vio.jpg


FwYO6Qr.jpg


HuQvlga.jpg


The last one is older, before the rebuild, approx 190k miles, alas for some reason I can't find last years, or in fact many from previous years, I do recall it being in the mid 0.30's for both.

Pete

 
I've got an older MOT that has CO level = 0.03 %. Proves diddly squat about engine condition, more likely the TPS sensors idle circuit was on the blink. Or the sniffer wasn't far enough up the tailpipe.

 
CO levels I would agree, high HC would though as the MOT tester agreed...it's discovering a big change is what I look out for.

 
As stated the last image is from before the rebuild, perhaps 5k before...the engine was not rebuilt because it was in general poor health, it was rebuilt because I didn't imediately switch off when the crank pulley fell off which caused excessive wear loosing over 1 bar of oil pressure. It was still running fine with no smoke or noise. There were a number of jobs at that time that needed doing including new rear balance shaft seals. So we decided to pull the engine, refresh everything and make it stronger/safer than ever before, he rest is history and well documented.

 
Well you could, but if that's all you did with no long term development plus a detailed history and a proven track record to back it up , I'd say no you haven't and I'd be right.

 
Yep....but I'm not going to write a book to explain it to you...everything is logged out there for those willing to read and understand the car's development over the last 20 years....I know my car very well, I know how fast it was with a proven 368bhp, I know the extra development since then which is massive and in fact total's approx £12k in parts alone....trust me, she is currently well over 400bhp with more to come if so desired.

 
Both of the cars that made 400 bhp on that dyno day had much bigger turbos than yours. There's no massive development, you spent £12k, and have been talking the car up ever since.

 
If you say so...just in case you're not aware which you clearly aren't....the 61 is capable of 650bhp at 1 bar of boost.. IMHO the 75 turbo's are too big for a 2.5....there's much more to a succesful build than just bolting on a bigger turbo...my own build is very well thought out and has gone much further than the 400 cars you mention....and that's the last I shall say on the subject...I have tried to be polite with you, not sure what your problem is but leave me out of it, I have far better things to do than squabble with you.

 
Sorry...it's 610bhp at 1 bar according to LR today...perhaps the design has changed? I recall it beinh higher but we are talking a long time ago...

 
Another day in the life of my 951 and another small job ticked. In this case, getting the A/C refilled and also converting the valves to accept the R134a connectors.

car plugged in receiving its gas at my son's place.

ZAMwvGC.jpg


And a close up of the new valves which surprisingly fit with zero contact with the bonnet.

QfrFC3u.jpg


If anyone in the North London needs a refill, my son charges customers £55 which according to my neighbour who just had his done for £70 is cheap, I have no idea myself what today's charges are.

Pete

 
Got my A4, XC60, and the SLK320 all done on a Groupon deal, pump out re-gas and decontamination process

£39.00 a car

 

Posts made and opinions expressed are those of the individual forum members

Use of the Forum is subject to the Terms and Conditions

Disclaimer

The opinions expressed on this site are not necessarily those of the Club, who shall have no liability in respect of them or the accuracy of the content. The Club assumes no responsibility for any effects arising from errors or omissions.

Porsche Club Great Britain gives no warranties, guarantees or assurances and makes no representations or recommendations regarding any goods or services advertised on this site. It is the responsibility of visitors to satisfy themselves that goods and/or services supplied by any advertiser are bona fide and in no instance can the Porsche Club Great Britain be held responsible.

When responding to advertisements please ensure that you satisfy yourself of any applicable call charges on numbers not prefixed by usual "landline" STD Codes. Information can be obtained from the operator or the white pages. Before giving out ANY information regarding cars, or any other items for sale, please satisfy yourself that any potential purchaser is bona fide.

Directors of the Board of Porsche Club GB, Club Office Staff, Register Secretaries and Regional Organisers are often requested by Club members to provide information on matters connected with their cars and other matters referred to in the Club Rules. Such information, advice and assistance provided by such persons is given in good faith and is based on the personal experience and knowledge of the individual concerned.

Neither Porsche Club GB, nor any of the aforementioned, shall be under any liability in respect of any such information, advice or assistance given to members. Members are advised to consult qualified specialists for information, advice and assistance on matters connected with their cars at all times.

Back
Top