Menu toggle

Are Spyders Becoming Extinct At OPCs!

ORIGINAL: philnotts99 . I think the overall car will look better in the flesh! Strange how Porsche hasnt really bigged this car up though.
Porsche leave the bigging up to the press but as the car doesn't appear to actually exist other than in a few pre-production cars [:D] we have had no reviews to read All very unusual to say the least The squared edge of the rear wings matches the squared edge of the new streamliners had they used the existing 987 Spyder rounded humps it would not have worked IMO
981-spyder-13-copyright-porsche-downloaded-from-stuttcars_com.jpg
2015%20porsche%20boxster%20spyder%20rear%20%C2%BE.jpg
 
Actually got some info from my OPC today and they have said November build slots so looks like a 2016 reg car for me as I go back to work early December and will be away till New Year at least. Final spec (at least this week) Porsche Code http://www.porsche-code.com/PG3KRNU8
 
ORIGINAL: H14PDB Actually got some info from my OPC today and they have said November build slots so looks like a 2016 reg car for me as I go back to work early December and will be away till New Year at least.
Any chance you can ask them if some cars will be available here for viewing at PEC in July as original forecasted Nice spec but no air con? [&o]
 
ORIGINAL: daro911
ORIGINAL: H14PDB Actually got some info from my OPC today and they have said November build slots so looks like a 2016 reg car for me as I go back to work early December and will be away till New Year at least.
Any chance you can ask them if some cars will be available here for viewing at PEC in July as original forecasted Nice spec but no air con? [&o]
Well, it gets stranger. Just had mail back from guy at OPC and Porsche have been on phone to say that you cannot have heated seats without having either manual or auto (climate control) air con. Apparently it is a glitch in configerator! So I will be having air con after all. I was leaving it out as had decided that if warm enough or really not raining then it was roof down as intended so not needed and try to stick to idea behind Spyder of being lightweight. I have spoken to PEC and they have no info on when getting a car but asked to be informed as soon as they know anything. Can only wait now.
 
ORIGINAL: H14PDB Well, it gets stranger. Just had mail back from guy at OPC and Porsche have been on phone to say that you cannot have heated seats without having either manual or auto (climate control) air con. Apparently it is a glitch in configerator! So I will be having air con after all. I was leaving it out as had decided that if warm enough or really not raining then it was roof down as intended so not needed and try to stick to idea behind Spyder of being lightweight.
I thought it weird ordering the auto wipers but no air con! Mind you using a Spyder in the rain makes no sense to my kind either [:D][:D] I am hoping to delay any final spec until I have seen and driven the bu99er[8D]
 
ORIGINAL: daro911
ORIGINAL: H14PDB Well, it gets stranger. Just had mail back from guy at OPC and Porsche have been on phone to say that you cannot have heated seats without having either manual or auto (climate control) air con. Apparently it is a glitch in configerator! So I will be having air con after all. I was leaving it out as had decided that if warm enough or really not raining then it was roof down as intended so not needed and try to stick to idea behind Spyder of being lightweight.
I thought it weird ordering the auto wipers but no air con! Mind you using a Spyder in the rain makes no sense to my kind either [:D][:D] I am hoping to delay any final spec until I have seen and driven the bu99er[8D]
It was not the auto wipers but dimming mirrors I wanted; I find that they are more of a bonus in low cars like this as the dazzle at night annoys me. Sign of old age. Also reason for upgraded headlights, like to have more power there nowadays.
 
I see that GT3 RS road tests have appeared today with Chris Harris video on Wednesday. So if it has taken that long for a car launched at Geneva, maybe a few more weeks before tests of Spyder?
 
ORIGINAL: H14PDB maybe a few more weeks before tests of Spyder?
If production starts in July as originally scheduled then June might finally see some reviews on how Good Bad or Ugly the Gen 2 Spyder really is although some on here have already condemned the car to the duff corner [:eek:]
 
I have not put it in the duff corner lol It's still a great car, just a small market for it which is ok as not many cars made anyway. I don't see where it fits in the line up or what it offers a 987.2 owner or GTS owner. The old one was quite a big change to the way they drive and also very direct and a good weight saving . the 987.2 Spyder came 1st then the r came later with a few tweeks. This time the gt4 came 1st and it looks like Porsche thought, o well we have made the 3.8 fit let's knock out a boxster with it but not make it as good as the gt4 . The new one is mainly GTS spec ie just x73 sus, with a 3.8 so neither as focused as the old one or as nice to live with as the GTS. And of course no weight saving in real terms. Great set up the x73 but then the GTS with buckets and x73 is the better bet for most. ESP if you want PDK and a working roof. The humps IMO on this car add nothing, the roof I wish was electric and trick r8 style and PDK should have been an option. I would even say a 981 GTS PDK would be quicker then the 981 Spyder due to how easy the PDK is to drive fast for 95% of people. So it leaves the 981 Spyder as less usable, so that puts it in the fun weekend bracket, but it looks less fun then the old one so why bother ? All a bit nice and finished off ( bar the roof) to be a hardcore fun toy. But a lot of us came from Elise, nobles, atoms, caterhams to the 987.2 car we want raw but are a bit older then we used to be lol. Atom and caterham = 20-30 year olds Elise , nobles 25-35 years olds 987.2 Spyder 30-50 year olds 981 Spyder 50+ lol don't forget to spec comfort seat so you can get out :p Lol just a bit of fun :)
 
Crikey! A missive from Mr D that I agree with (mostly!) That's a first! Except for one thing I am 63 in a 987 Spyder (58 when I bought it though!) By the way Porsche has just lodged a claim for the GT 5 model name. let,s start a Boxster GT 5 thread shall we ?
 
ORIGINAL: johnnyspyder* Crikey! A missive from Mr D that I agree with (mostly!) That's a first! Except for one thing I am 63 in a 987 Spyder (58 when I bought it though!) By the way Porsche has just lodged a claim for the GT 5 model name. let,s start a Boxster GT 5 thread shall we ?
Not many will agree with him[:D] [:D] Was going to take him to task myself I am a 70 year old and drive a 987.2 Spyder so not a car just for the young guns [;)][;)]
 
Fresh Spyder for sale today[8D] http://www.pistonheads.com/classifieds/used-cars/porsche/boxster-987-05-12/boxster-spyder-supplied-in-superb-original-condition-with-all-the-right-options/4211242 Porsche Boxster Spyder First Registered During June 2011 Full Documented Porsche Service History Carrara White Black Leather / Alcantara Interior Carbon Folding Sports Bucket Seats 19” Boxster Spyder Alloy Wheels (Painted Black) Switchable Sports Exhaust System Sports Chrono Package Plus PDK Dual Clutch Transmission PCM 3 Navigation Module PCM 3 Telephone Module Sound Package Plus Universal Multimedia Interface Porsche Stability Management Sports Steering Wheel with PDK Paddles Door Mirrors Electrically Adjustable and Heatable Air Conditioning Floor Mats Past experience with Boxster Spyders has made the JZM team fully aware just how important the factory specification is on these rare and collectable future classics. Spyders with the right options tend to get snapped up pretty quickly…… Namely, Carbon folding buckets, Sport chrono (In conjunction with PDK), Switchable sports exhaust, Correct Spyder alloys, Navigation and most importantly A/C.
 
i was 50 when i bought my first Atom and perhaps it may also be my next car. i would like to spec my second Atom from new but only time will tell.
ORIGINAL: MrDemon I have not put it in the duff corner lol It's still a great car, just a small market for it which is ok as not many cars made anyway. I don't see where it fits in the line up or what it offers a 987.2 owner or GTS owner. The old one was quite a big change to the way they drive and also very direct and a good weight saving . the 987.2 Spyder came 1st then the r came later with a few tweeks. This time the gt4 came 1st and it looks like Porsche thought, o well we have made the 3.8 fit let's knock out a boxster with it but not make it as good as the gt4 . The new one is mainly GTS spec ie just x73 sus, with a 3.8 so neither as focused as the old one or as nice to live with as the GTS. And of course no weight saving in real terms. Great set up the x73 but then the GTS with buckets and x73 is the better bet for most. ESP if you want PDK and a working roof. The humps IMO on this car add nothing, the roof I wish was electric and trick r8 style and PDK should have been an option. I would even say a 981 GTS PDK would be quicker then the 981 Spyder due to how easy the PDK is to drive fast for 95% of people. So it leaves the 981 Spyder as less usable, so that puts it in the fun weekend bracket, but it looks less fun then the old one so why bother ? All a bit nice and finished off ( bar the roof) to be a hardcore fun toy. But a lot of us came from Elise, nobles, atoms, caterhams to the 987.2 car we want raw but are a bit older then we used to be lol. Atom and caterham = 20-30 year olds Elise , nobles 25-35 years olds 987.2 Spyder 30-50 year olds 981 Spyder 50+ lol don't forget to spec comfort seat so you can get out :p Lol just a bit of fun :)
 
ORIGINAL: Nattyboy Spotted that (but then I am checking several times a day for one lol). Very strong money for a PDK car ? Maybe SOR ?
my manual is going up for more than that ie £50k+[;)]so as long as its a late chassis number ie 2012 MY build and not a car that was built 6 months earlier and sat in a showroom then its on the money
 

Posts made and opinions expressed are those of the individual forum members

Use of the Forum is subject to the Terms and Conditions

Disclaimer

The opinions expressed on this site are not necessarily those of the Club, who shall have no liability in respect of them or the accuracy of the content. The Club assumes no responsibility for any effects arising from errors or omissions.

Porsche Club Great Britain gives no warranties, guarantees or assurances and makes no representations or recommendations regarding any goods or services advertised on this site. It is the responsibility of visitors to satisfy themselves that goods and/or services supplied by any advertiser are bona fide and in no instance can the Porsche Club Great Britain be held responsible.

When responding to advertisements please ensure that you satisfy yourself of any applicable call charges on numbers not prefixed by usual "landline" STD Codes. Information can be obtained from the operator or the white pages. Before giving out ANY information regarding cars, or any other items for sale, please satisfy yourself that any potential purchaser is bona fide.

Directors of the Board of Porsche Club GB, Club Office Staff, Register Secretaries and Regional Organisers are often requested by Club members to provide information on matters connected with their cars and other matters referred to in the Club Rules. Such information, advice and assistance provided by such persons is given in good faith and is based on the personal experience and knowledge of the individual concerned.

Neither Porsche Club GB, nor any of the aforementioned, shall be under any liability in respect of any such information, advice or assistance given to members. Members are advised to consult qualified specialists for information, advice and assistance on matters connected with their cars at all times.

Back
Top