Menu toggle

Beaky's Diet

kinetic energy is proportional to the square of velocity - so the benefits of weight loss should follow the same law, as what you're doing is converting the ke to heat/sound when braking or cornering.

I think this makes sense - I'm sure someone else will come along with a better explanation [:D]
 
I love discussions like this, its like being in a nice warm pub with your mates on a PistonHeads `hoon` [:)]

kinetic energy is proportional to the square of velocity - so the benefits of weight loss should follow the same law, as what you're doing is converting the ke to heat/sound when braking or cornering.

Correct - primarily heat hence my summation (regarding larger brake pad/disc areas) that if you have mahoosive power and mahoosive straight line speed momentum that carries the car into a corner you then have a huge amount of kinetic energy that has to be lost quickly, very quickly. The only other option is to slow down earlier and brake for longer (however the latter course of action is why most brakes light up or fade due to poor driver skills and uncertainty) As the Ke is turned to heat there must be direct proportion (for as we all know you cannot create nor destroy energy, only convert it) so increasing engine output by a given percentage and travelling correspondingly faster at a given point before braking will roughly correlate to a similar additional proportion of heat generated at the brakes that needs to be lost.

Remember also that bigger brakes/discs offer a much better mechanical advantage as the disc diameter increases so in theory standard calipers will be more efficient on larger discs BUT the amount of heat will be the same [admittedly with a larger moving mass (disc) within which to spread/cool/lose it] As an example I`m playing with 256mm but considering fitting 288mm discs to the Mk 1 Golf (nominally 60mm bigger than OEM)

But forgetting all the technical stuff - to get back to my original point - which was to try and offer some courses of action to Nick (Appleton) - unless you are tracking seriously and want a stripped out racer, there are real tangible advantages in improving the current cars dynamics. Most people I know that track their cars spend a fortune on them for perhaps three or four days/evenings a year?? Theres nothing wrong with that because I have been guilty myself................. and we all love those shiny bits dont we..................... whereas simply driving your well prepared car regularly at speed on track using the money saved on major upgrades or shiny bits etc for more track time will invariably lose more than those 80kgs as your lap times drop requiring only removing unwanted kit like the spare, stickier tyres and decent pads and fluid.

On the other hand I`ll have to admit my quest to lighten the Golf is ongoing.......................................[8|][8|]
 
ORIGINAL: Hilux

I love discussions like this, its like being in a nice warm pub with your mates on a PistonHeads `hoon` [:)]

kinetic energy is proportional to the square of velocity - so the benefits of weight loss should follow the same law, as what you're doing is converting the ke to heat/sound when braking or cornering.

Correct - primarily heat hence my summation (regarding larger brake pad/disc areas) that if you have mahoosive power and mahoosive straight line speed momentum that carries the car into a corner you then have a huge amount of kinetic energy that has to be lost quickly, very quickly. The only other option is to slow down earlier and brake for longer (however the latter course of action is why most brakes light up or fade due to poor driver skills and uncertainty) As the Ke is turned to heat there must be direct proportion (for as we all know you cannot create nor destroy energy, only convert it) so increasing engine output by a given percentage and travelling correspondingly faster at a given point before braking will roughly correlate to a similar additional proportion of heat generated at the brakes that needs to be lost.

Remember also that bigger brakes/discs offer a much better mechanical advantage as the disc diameter increases so in theory standard calipers will be more efficient on larger discs BUT the amount of heat will be the same [admittedly with a larger moving mass (disc) within which to spread/cool/lose it] As an example I`m playing with 256mm but considering fitting 288mm discs to the Mk 1 Golf (nominally 60mm bigger than OEM)

But forgetting all the technical stuff - to get back to my original point - which was to try and offer some courses of action to Nick (Appleton) - unless you are tracking seriously and want a stripped out racer, there are real tangible advantages in improving the current cars dynamics. Most people I know that track their cars spend a fortune on them for perhaps three or four days/evenings a year?? Theres nothing wrong with that because I have been guilty myself................. and we all love those shiny bits dont we..................... whereas simply driving your well prepared car regularly at speed on track using the money saved on major upgrades or shiny bits etc for more track time will invariably lose more than those 80kgs as your lap times drop requiring only removing unwanted kit like the spare, stickier tyres and decent pads and fluid.

On the other hand I`ll have to admit my quest to lighten the Golf is ongoing.......................................[8|][8|]

Yep, you've hit the nail on the head! Driving my car on track is about fun and learning how to get the best out of it by the driver.

If I accept that it is an 18yr old road car that is good fun to drive on track then I should just be able to enjoy it for what it is - ie NOT a racing car!

Trouble is, I love the tinkering/improving bit too and those two things together are lethal/expensive.....[8|]

[:D]
 
Without intending to give this thread a white-haired feel, how do you express/quantify heat in function of the kinetic powere needed to slow down the car?
 
ORIGINAL: Hilux

Remember also that bigger brakes/discs offer a much better mechanical advantage as the disc diameter increases so in theory standard calipers will be more efficient on larger discs BUT the amount of heat will be the same [admittedly with a larger moving mass (disc) within which to spread/cool/lose it] As an example I`m playing with 256mm but considering fitting 288mm discs to the Mk 1 Golf (nominally 60mm bigger than OEM)

I wouldn't bother yet.. I ran a Mk1 Fiesta track car (ex. race car with approx 140hp) on a standard brake setup (with better pads) - it was more than adequate, even with trackday tyres. [:D] It was/ is an awesome track machine, but the 15l fuel tank was a bit limiting, and it was very uncomfortable on the road. It sounded great on twin 45's at 7k rpm [:D]
 
Something that's not been touched upon (I don't think) is the increase in tactility you get with a lighter car, it's not just about going faster but getting more involved in the driving experience. I suppose it's a very personal thing, as an example I'd say a standard luxurious 911 does little for me, but an RS hits the spot, but I completely understand why someone would feel the opposite.
 
I bet there's only around 100kg between a C2 and a GT3RS - of course part of that extra "tactility" is the noise and stiffness. I still have my own lightweight plans, but need to get through 2009 first I think before spending loads of money on it.

Peter - how is your car on the road? Do you think it will be manageable just with carpets? I'm really looking forward to seeing the finished product.
 
I wouldn't bother yet.. I ran a Mk1 Fiesta track car (ex. race car with approx 140hp) on a standard brake setup (with better pads) - it was more than adequate, even with trackday tyres. [:D] It was/ is an awesome track machine, but the 15l fuel tank was a bit limiting, and it was very uncomfortable on the road. It sounded great on twin 45's at 7k rpm [:D]

[8D] Twin Weber`s - the induction roar is fantastic.

Agree about the brakes however the Mk 1 Golf brakes have a bar that connects the pedal across the bulkhead to the servo via a bell crank system and loses efficiency (the brakes are cr*p basically) so what I need is greater advantage via 1) a bigger servo or 2) via bigger discs

The calipers are cheap (VX Vectra SRi) but (here we go again) add unsprung weight........................................

.......................which is whole different talking point as we`ll all now discuss running on musthavetanium A arms, unobtainium hubs and allymanium billet 6 pot calipered magnesianium 13" wheel set ups with CF discs [;)]





John, sorry this thread has gone off the rails..................my fault

How`s your back [:D]................................
 
To be honest Ed it's a bit too loud now (I only have the luxury of front floor mats after all) but I expected that and it's still possible to talk to passengers on light throttle openings. The noise is however glorious when pedal meets bulkhead. Prolonged full throttle or motorway cruising is loud (I'll get a meter on it at some point) but I'd say it was at a dangerous level for long exposure periods without a crash helmet or earplugs.

A lot of the noise is from the gearbox and the 888's (they're an incredibly noisy tyre!) and I think that simply throwing the rear carpet in (perhaps with some extra underlay) will calm it down quite a bit and still be track ready in seconds. The gearbox is due a rebuild at some point so that will probably help too. You do still have to like the sound of stones flicking off the tyres though [:D]

I haven't ruled out fitting some light carpets throughout, but am enjoying the appeal of a pseudo racer at the moment and know I can always make it more comfortable without adding much weight when I get bored of it. I am however a child at heart so this isn't likely to happen any time soon. You really must have a go in it Ed, it's great fun now.
 
ORIGINAL: Peter Empson
You really must have a go in it Ed, it's great fun now.

I was hoping you'd say that [:D] - I have some servicing to do & then I need a track day in April before I head off to Germany (we have some spare seats for passengers if you're interested Peter - mind you, your car would be ace out there, even if the journey was a bit wearing [:D])

I'm doing a fair number of m-way trips in the 944 at the moment - it's a great tool for the job. Although even with the rear seats/carpets etc.. I do get a fair bit of noise from the rear, so it might get a bit uncomfortable when stripped. the gearbox is much noisers when the boot carpet is out on trackdays - and my box is one of the quieter ones I've heard. I think the ultimate solution is in-ear headphones (I use the Etymotic E6i ones with my phone & they are pretty good)
 
I'll be trying some noise cancelling heaphones when I get it on the road to see if there's a more comfortable option, but I can't see them offering the 20-30dB drop I need at the right frequencies.

I love to get it to the ring but intend to spend the next few weeks sorting out the SC to see if it's reliable enough to do track days during the peak of the season, but maybe next year. I'm also facing the fact that the rings are well and truly shot so I really need to spend some more there to get them sorted first.
 
ORIGINAL: Hilux

........John, sorry this thread has gone off the rails..................my fault

How`s your back [:D]................................

No worries, it's all part and parcel. [:)]

The back isn't great and I do a good impersonation of someone twice my age. It was significantly better yesterday morning until I wrestled a less than helpful small boy out of his bed which set my back back again. [:mad:]

I need to get a new office chair really and have resorted to a light weight folding chair currently as it gives me less problems - just.
 
ORIGINAL: John Sims
It was significantly better yesterday morning until I wrestled a less than helpful small boy out of his bed which set my back back again. [:mad:]

I thought that was what Mostyn was for [:D]
 
Without intending to give this thread a white-haired feel, how do you express/quantify heat in function of the kinetic powere needed to slow down the car?

Thom

I`m not quite sure of the question in that if I understand it correctly it has been answered but basically braking converts the cars kinetic energy (motion) into heat and as you cannot lose or destroy energy the calorific value must correlate to the kinetic energy lost.

Thats my understanding anyway.

Peter

I`ve just realised your cars up and running at last, well done. Any piccies [:)]?? I bet one of the more noticeable aspects is improved turn in with less weight transfer?

On a safety note (I`m a PM in the construction industry) as a rule of thumb if you have to raise your voice to another person at 1m distance you should consider hearing protection and if you have to shout you NEED hearing protection or you will suffer damage. This includes wind noise of course as they were both bathtubs. In my Westfield I always (had to) wear ear plugs, this included wind noise, but could still hold a conversation (shouting of course [;)])
 
Mostyn is better behaved than Peter but too gentle to deploy effectively in such circumstances. He certainly made all of the right noises though.

As a kid we had a dog that wouldn't have stood any of that nonsense. He was a dog of his time and not PC enough for today. He was driven by three overriding motives - Can I mount it? Can I eat it? Can I kill it? pretty much in that order. He hated children as they didn't figure on his scale of being good for any of the above.
 
ORIGINAL: John Sims
As a kid we had a dog that wouldn't have stood any of that nonsense. He was a dog of his time and not PC enough for today. He was driven by three overriding motives - Can I mount it? Can I eat it? Can I kill it? pretty much in that order. He hated children as they didn't figure on his scale of being good for any of the above.

:ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:
 
ORIGINAL: Hilux

Peter

I`ve just realised your cars up and running at last, well done. Any piccies [:)]?? I bet one of the more noticeable aspects is improved turn in with less weight transfer?

On a safety note (I`m a PM in the construction industry) as a rule of thumb if you have to raise your voice to another person at 1m distance you should consider hearing protection and if you have to shout you NEED hearing protection or you will suffer damage.

Hi Paul,

Nick got some great pics in this thread here, it should be properly on the road pretty soon but it's got a lot of temporary bits on it at the moment just to get me to Oulton. There's some fine tuning to get the level of fit and finish that we all want, but I'm very pleased so far [:D] The awful temporary lights will be gone soon, replaced by the very first set of the new Deutsch Nine lights, which will be far more in keeping with the rest of the car.

I'm always very conscious of my hearing given my job, so I'll be making sure there's proper protection for me and any passengers at all times (not that I'm likely to get many in the white car, they all seem to prefer the red one for some reason [:D]... Wimps!).
 
ORIGINAL: Hilux
I`m not quite sure of the question in that if I understand it correctly it has been answered but basically braking converts the cars kinetic energy (motion) into heat and as you cannot lose or destroy energy the calorific value must correlate to the kinetic energy lost.

Thanks, actually I was asking for some sort of mathematical formula.
It may prove a bit difficult though [&:]
 
ORIGINAL: John Sims

This is pure speculation on my part and no doubt someone (944man [;)]) will claim it is complete tosh, but none the less.

Unneccessarily harsh...[:D] Youll never convince me that a nomex lining in a helmet serves any useful purpose though; even where youre wearing underwear, a good three layer suit and an approved balaclava, youll still obtain horrific burns to the rest of your body before the lining makes a difference...
 
ORIGINAL: 944 man

........ Youll never convince me that a nomex lining in a helmet serves any useful purpose though;.....

Seemingly not. I hope you are never in the situation where I can say "Told you so" [:eek:]
 

Posts made and opinions expressed are those of the individual forum members

Use of the Forum is subject to the Terms and Conditions

Disclaimer

The opinions expressed on this site are not necessarily those of the Club, who shall have no liability in respect of them or the accuracy of the content. The Club assumes no responsibility for any effects arising from errors or omissions.

Porsche Club Great Britain gives no warranties, guarantees or assurances and makes no representations or recommendations regarding any goods or services advertised on this site. It is the responsibility of visitors to satisfy themselves that goods and/or services supplied by any advertiser are bona fide and in no instance can the Porsche Club Great Britain be held responsible.

When responding to advertisements please ensure that you satisfy yourself of any applicable call charges on numbers not prefixed by usual "landline" STD Codes. Information can be obtained from the operator or the white pages. Before giving out ANY information regarding cars, or any other items for sale, please satisfy yourself that any potential purchaser is bona fide.

Directors of the Board of Porsche Club GB, Club Office Staff, Register Secretaries and Regional Organisers are often requested by Club members to provide information on matters connected with their cars and other matters referred to in the Club Rules. Such information, advice and assistance provided by such persons is given in good faith and is based on the personal experience and knowledge of the individual concerned.

Neither Porsche Club GB, nor any of the aforementioned, shall be under any liability in respect of any such information, advice or assistance given to members. Members are advised to consult qualified specialists for information, advice and assistance on matters connected with their cars at all times.

Back
Top