You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Cayman GT4: Where are we up to now?
- Thread starter Motorhead
- Start date
[link=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FM5CmtCSbwM]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FM5CmtCSbwM[/link]
You may want to try out Sharkwerks' modifications - shorter 3rd-5th gear ratios, a lighter flywheel, an upgraded LSD, 425bhp plus aero mods. Henry Catchpole seems to like it..!
www.roadandtrack.com/car-culture/videos/a32507/sharkwerks-cayman-gt4/
Jeff
just uses the bigger throttle with the cargraphic manifolds (U.K. Made)and a 3rd party tune. As for catchpole, it's unforgivable given it's his job to say it's a x51 power pack engine.
So what we were doing to gen 1 Caymans back in 2005 Inc the guards diff etc.And what my Spyder was 5 years back.
I also dont get the shorter 3rd gear, 2 gear is the issue imo. Now 3rd just is like 2nd gear, very odd move. Hardly aids acceration when you don't change to 3rd till 80 plus mph !
given sharkwerks name it's lazy and disappointing and late to the party.
jens seems to be still leading the way with tuning, his latest was a 981 3.4 giving 385bhp !
They explain the limited re-gearing by saying:
The ideal solution would be a complete re-gearing of 1st through 6th gears. However, that comes at an enormous cost for small batch parts and engineering 1st and 2nd gears will likely not be an option for years, if ever.
We have tested re-gearing on our own project GT4 and have settled on a solution that changes 3rd, 4th, and 5th gears to shorter, closer ratios (approx difference is 14% in 3rd, 18% in 4th, and 16% in 5th). This allows shifting to 3rd gear sooner when needed, or staying in 2nd til the normal shift point and jumping to a better position in the powerband in 3rd, and staying in 3rd gear in more situations (ie mid-low speed corners) with improved acceleration. By shortening 3rd, 4th, and 5th gears, you have closer ratios and stay in the powerband longer through typical top speeds, and will be able to retain the original freeway overdrive gear, since 6th gear is unchanged.
Given the LSD reworking, I'm surprised that they didn't engineer a lower final drive ratio. Cost constraints again I presume.
As you say, Jens appears to be the favourite go-to tuner for the 981-series cars (I think that you posted the power curve elsewhere on the forum but can't find it). DeMan Motorsport planned to fit an X51 Power Kit to a 4.0L GT4 but haven't heard of anyone else..??
Jeff
[link=http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/porsche/cayman/98318/hardcore-40-litre-porsche-cayman-gt4-rs-on-the-cards]http://www.autoexpress.co...an-gt4-rs-on-the-cards[/link]
At least Porsche may be thinking along the lines of a n/a 982 GT4.
Jeff
we cannot even get the GT3 SPec and that's out in a week !
the next 2 sports cars after that are the 991 Speedster and the GT2, I have no idea why the mags don't talk about these 2 new cars, but I guess they don't even know that !
(ok I clicked the bait and they did talk about the GT2 but the GT3 and the GT2 specs are not what is coming, so made up numbers ) they think a new base GT3 will have more BHP than the outgoing 991 RS , I doubt that also.
GT4 with a 4.0 L engine will never happen imo we have the 718 now so what engine can they really put in a new GT4 !
put it this way it cannot be a GT3 engine because we have the GT3 at £40k above the GT4 price. There is no space in the line up for a GT4 RS, well with a 4 pot there might be.
And as a GT4 RS would be a few years away, we need a GTS 1st can you see them putting the 991.1 old 3.8 GTS unit in it !
The mags print rubbish, the insiders they talk about are made up from thin air but once a story is posted by one mag they all need to do it to get the clicks.
Brian_Innes
Member
A lot of guff, (or the current word, "fake news") is printed by the mags to sell print.
All will become apparent in the fullness of time.
As I posted elsewhere, Porsche have painted themselves into a corner with the sports cars engines.
Brian
However, even for relatively limited production it's possible that the next GT4 could still use the flat-6 n/a engine with either 3.8L or 4.0L capacity since I believe that the GT4, GT3 and Turbo share the same crankcase/block casting, albeit with different heads and internals. An engine is just an assembly of components and if they can be manufactured and supplied at the right price I'm sure that Porsche can produce a midly uprated engine with minor development costs.
The 982 BIW rear structure has been modified slightly compared with that of the 981 to accept the 4-pot engine which is subframe mounted, but I don't think that it would be difficult to incorporate the flat-6 engine in the 982 chassis. Anyway, the GT4 body has some additional reinforcements compared with that of the standard 981 body, so body mods aren't out of the question for the next car.
Work would be required integrating the 981-series electronics into the latest series car; again, not an insurmountable problem but one which incurs costs.
So, will Porsche do it? Heart says yes but head says no. A lot depends upon production numbers, and I've a feeling that Porsche won't be caught out with demand comfortably outstripping supply the second time around.
Just my tuppence worth of course.
Jeff
A GT4 is £64k and GT3 is £105k both with no options at a guess, so it cannot have the 4.0l engine and the GT3 3.8 has major issues.
A GT4 RS with the 3.8 GTS 420BHP unit and carbon bonnet for £80k might work, but then the race car does not have the GTS unit for some odd reason.
So I cannot see any of those working, which leaves a future GT4 with a 4 pot in 3 years time, and never a RS.
At £64 the GT4 was a comparative bargain but I'm sure that we'll be looking at the next car coming in at around £70k due to the weakness of Sterling against the Euro, inflation, profiteering, etc.
I'm always intrigued to know: who are these "insiders" and "sources" that the mags quote? Are they jounalistic Fifth Columnists? Aggrieved employees perhaps? Maybe they're double-agents; misinformers planted by The Company to spead unfounded rumours..!
Jeff
Posts made and opinions expressed are those of the individual forum members
Use of the Forum is subject to the Terms and Conditions
Disclaimer
The opinions expressed on this site are not necessarily those of the Club, who shall have no liability in respect of them or the accuracy of the content. The Club assumes no responsibility for any effects arising from errors or omissions.
Porsche Club Great Britain gives no warranties, guarantees or assurances and makes no representations or recommendations regarding any goods or services advertised on this site. It is the responsibility of visitors to satisfy themselves that goods and/or services supplied by any advertiser are bona fide and in no instance can the Porsche Club Great Britain be held responsible.
When responding to advertisements please ensure that you satisfy yourself of any applicable call charges on numbers not prefixed by usual "landline" STD Codes. Information can be obtained from the operator or the white pages. Before giving out ANY information regarding cars, or any other items for sale, please satisfy yourself that any potential purchaser is bona fide.
Directors of the Board of Porsche Club GB, Club Office Staff, Register Secretaries and Regional Organisers are often requested by Club members to provide information on matters connected with their cars and other matters referred to in the Club Rules. Such information, advice and assistance provided by such persons is given in good faith and is based on the personal experience and knowledge of the individual concerned.
Neither Porsche Club GB, nor any of the aforementioned, shall be under any liability in respect of any such information, advice or assistance given to members. Members are advised to consult qualified specialists for information, advice and assistance on matters connected with their cars at all times.